RAD-AI: Rethinking Architecture Documentation for AI-Augmented Ecosystems
arXiv:2603.28735v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI-augmented ecosystems (interconnected systems where multiple AI components interact through shared data and infrastructure) are becoming the architectural norm for smart cities, autonomous fleets, and intelligent platforms. Yet the architecture documentation frameworks practitioners rely on, arc42 and the C4 model, were designed for deterministic software and cannot capture probabilistic behavior, data-dependent evolution, or dual ML/software lifecycles. This gap carries regulatory consequence: the EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) mandates te — Oliver Aleksander Larsen, Mahyar T. Moghaddam
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:AI-augmented ecosystems (interconnected systems where multiple AI components interact through shared data and infrastructure) are becoming the architectural norm for smart cities, autonomous fleets, and intelligent platforms. Yet the architecture documentation frameworks practitioners rely on, arc42 and the C4 model, were designed for deterministic software and cannot capture probabilistic behavior, data-dependent evolution, or dual ML/software lifecycles. This gap carries regulatory consequence: the EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) mandates technical documentation through Annex IV that no existing framework provides structured support for, with enforcement for high-risk systems beginning August 2, 2026. We present RAD-AI, a backward-compatible extension framework that augments arc42 with eight AI-specific sections and C4 with three diagram extensions, complemented by a systematic EU AI Act Annex IV compliance mapping. A regulatory coverage assessment with six experienced software-architecture practitioners provides preliminary evidence that RAD-AI increases Annex IV addressability from approximately 36% to 93% (mean rating) and demonstrates substantial improvement over existing frameworks. Comparative analysis on two production AI platforms (Uber Michelangelo, Netflix Metaflow) captures eight additional AI-specific concerns missed by standard frameworks and demonstrates that documentation deficiencies are structural rather than domain-specific. An illustrative smart mobility ecosystem case study reveals ecosystem-level concerns, including cascading drift and differentiated compliance obligations, that are invisible under standard notation.
Comments: Accepted at ANGE 2026, co-located with IEEE ICSA 2026. 8 pages
Subjects:
Software Engineering (cs.SE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
ACM classes: D.2.11
Cite as: arXiv:2603.28735 [cs.SE]
(or arXiv:2603.28735v1 [cs.SE] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.28735
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Oliver Larsen [view email] [v1] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 17:48:56 UTC (19 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
![[D] AI research on small language models](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-ai-chip-closeup-KMZ5N5zRxP2NRiYJ8TB9TM.webp)
[D] AI research on small language models
i'm doing research on some trending fields in AI, currently working on small language models and would love to meet people who are working in similar domains and are looking to write/publish papers! submitted by /u/StoicWithSyrup [link] [comments]
Promising Signals on AI Governance from China
View the official memo here. China has consistently signaled a willingness to engage on global AI governance since at least 2017. This memo compiles key statements from the Chinese government and prominent figures demonstrating their desire to coordinate on the problem of AI. Chinese Vice Premier Ding Xuexiang, at the 2025 World Economic Forum, said: [ ] The post Promising Signals on AI Governance from China appeared first on Machine Intelligence Research Institute .
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
VLMs Need Words: Vision Language Models Ignore Visual Detail In Favor of Semantic Anchors
Vision Language Models struggle with fine-grained visual perception tasks due to their language-centric training approach, performing poorly on unnamed visual entities despite having relevant information in their representations. (1 upvotes on HuggingFace)
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!