MiroEval: Benchmarking Multimodal Deep Research Agents in Process and Outcome
arXiv:2603.28407v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent progress in deep research systems has been impressive, but evaluation still lags behind real user needs. Existing benchmarks predominantly assess final reports using fixed rubrics, failing to evaluate the underlying research process. Most also offer limited multimodal coverage, rely on synthetic tasks that do not reflect real-world query complexity, and cannot be refreshed as knowledge evolves. To address these gaps, we introduce MiroEval, a benchmark and evaluation framework for deep research systems. The benchmark comprises 100 tasks (70 — Fangda Ye, Yuxin Hu, Pengxiang Zhu, Yibo Li, Ziqi Jin, Yao Xiao, Yibo Wang, Lei Wang, Zhen Zhang, Lu Wang, Yue Deng, Bin Wang, Yifan Zhang, Liangcai Su, Xinyu Wang, He Zhao, Chen Wei, Qiang Ren, Bryan Hooi, An Bo, Shuicheng Yan, Lidong Bing
Authors:Fangda Ye, Yuxin Hu, Pengxiang Zhu, Yibo Li, Ziqi Jin, Yao Xiao, Yibo Wang, Lei Wang, Zhen Zhang, Lu Wang, Yue Deng, Bin Wang, Yifan Zhang, Liangcai Su, Xinyu Wang, He Zhao, Chen Wei, Qiang Ren, Bryan Hooi, An Bo, Shuicheng Yan, Lidong Bing
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Recent progress in deep research systems has been impressive, but evaluation still lags behind real user needs. Existing benchmarks predominantly assess final reports using fixed rubrics, failing to evaluate the underlying research process. Most also offer limited multimodal coverage, rely on synthetic tasks that do not reflect real-world query complexity, and cannot be refreshed as knowledge evolves. To address these gaps, we introduce MiroEval, a benchmark and evaluation framework for deep research systems. The benchmark comprises 100 tasks (70 text-only, 30 multimodal), all grounded in real user needs and constructed via a dual-path pipeline that supports periodic updates, enabling a live and evolving setting. The proposed evaluation suite assesses deep research systems along three complementary dimensions: adaptive synthesis quality evaluation with task-specific rubrics, agentic factuality verification via active retrieval and reasoning over both web sources and multimodal attachments, and process-centric evaluation audits how the system searches, reasons, and refines throughout its investigation. Evaluation across 13 systems yields three principal findings: the three evaluation dimensions capture complementary aspects of system capability, with each revealing distinct strengths and weaknesses across systems; process quality serves as a reliable predictor of overall outcome while revealing weaknesses invisible to output-level metrics; and multimodal tasks pose substantially greater challenges, with most systems declining by 3 to 10 points. The MiroThinker series achieves the most balanced performance, with MiroThinker-H1 ranking the highest overall in both settings. Human verification and robustness results confirm the reliability of the benchmark and evaluation framework. MiroEval provides a holistic diagnostic tool for the next generation of deep research agents.
Comments: GitHub: this https URL
Subjects:
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.28407 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2603.28407v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.28407
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Lei Wang [view email] [v1] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 13:16:03 UTC (1,317 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxivExclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models - WSJ
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiuANBVV95cUxOOGItWGdQMGlaeThwcnNieE40a05Ed19xRnlsYm9XdXdhTk9yc2NvWDU3Y3EwTDZNb2kzQ1Z1T0RIcEZlZDBNRTNTUG1LQ0I4cVZEQUZEcXhqREk5RllkS3EzTU10eHNrcWFDQ0lEdmYxaTBNMi1iMWMxS0t3bHpOSWt2bXhQcGxMOFFEWVNhN29HNVpmVkIwVXc2UmEtOFBpMnJvMi1rRkVxcWt2LWVvdnItNkllR1gyano3VEpPQVZNdTZWRkFvcWdWRm5QSmtTYmE2ajhnQ0picndQNE0xd21fdG1RWFpjcFFiRHh2OVRYMTVBclg2RTJvM1ZxZ0lmOWJrQV91S05kbjhXM3B6Z3BMeGJiY2tzMVNpNzZaNW91QjM4VFJIazVFOFRGSDJBdWg4ZXY3VUVvQnhkc3BIWjU2d0M3Uk1PdXZjOFR0QnplZmJQQkl6QVhNaEgzUG53RWwxdmRFNng5Q3pqc0hBaHNrTFVobk1iVV9PNnh2NEpGVEZ0TGZrUWNEZjlWMDNjWVZyV0UzZndPZ2I1dUtZWDN5TFJMUklkc1hoNWYwMEpRMkZJbEwxcQ?oc=5" target="_blank">Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">WSJ</font>
Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models - wsj.com
<a href="https://news.google.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?oc=5" target="_blank">Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">wsj.com</font>
AI Inspires New Research Topics In Materials Science - miragenews.com
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMihwFBVV95cUxQRlVFdkRBaHRvYkJJdFRlMTZmajEzeFRPU0hGWWdfbi02V1FnTUdVQ2pmY2VZLUV2NlB4V3BFdEVlSVZkUlhRSTZaNWFKMmcyWXJYbnNqbUhMTmp0NnFtMEppOXlPZkJSNHJfck5VSEVYcmUtX1k2QkJlR1BvUEdTTkp3UmlYRkk?oc=5" target="_blank">AI Inspires New Research Topics In Materials Science</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">miragenews.com</font>
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
AI Inspires New Research Topics In Materials Science - miragenews.com
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMihwFBVV95cUxQRlVFdkRBaHRvYkJJdFRlMTZmajEzeFRPU0hGWWdfbi02V1FnTUdVQ2pmY2VZLUV2NlB4V3BFdEVlSVZkUlhRSTZaNWFKMmcyWXJYbnNqbUhMTmp0NnFtMEppOXlPZkJSNHJfck5VSEVYcmUtX1k2QkJlR1BvUEdTTkp3UmlYRkk?oc=5" target="_blank">AI Inspires New Research Topics In Materials Science</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">miragenews.com</font>
From brain scans to alloys: Teaching AI to make sense of complex research data - Penn State University
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiwAFBVV95cUxPZDFHdkptQ2VUM2hmWjhqQkxoRnBiTWoxMXRRR21MUG5TamdUMlFRWmhvYVNHaFVNREVKU3VmSnVOdDVZYnNLb2ppYXRVRTZmVFVMV1pLTlVhUm9ybTNZbGtvZTdIMnIyMHNpOEk5aU9TSmxxS2Y4V2MwazYwY3JlX1Axbk1nd3pfcWhFdUJaaDJWRXJaMFIyTTROcmFHeXI3ZzFudXJ2M1h6UHI1LW1Ca1dta2RkM3BiYndocGk3Yjg?oc=5" target="_blank">From brain scans to alloys: Teaching AI to make sense of complex research data</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Penn State University</font>

Locating Risk: Task Designers and the Challenge of Risk Disclosure in RAI Content Work
arXiv:2505.24246v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As AI systems are increasingly tested and deployed in open-ended and high-stakes domains, crowdworkers are often tasked with responsible AI (RAI) content work. These tasks include labeling violent content, moderating disturbing text, or simulating harmful behavior for red teaming exercises to shape AI system behaviors. While prior research efforts have highlighted the risks to worker well-being associated with RAI content work, far less attention has been paid to how these risks are communicated to workers by task designers or individuals who design and post RAI tasks. Existing transparency frameworks and guidelines, such as model cards, datasheets, and crowdworksheets, focus on documenting model information and dataset collection process

Togedule: Scheduling Meetings with Large Language Models and Adaptive Representations of Group Availability
arXiv:2505.01000v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Scheduling is a perennial-and often challenging-problem for many groups. Existing tools are mostly static, showing an identical set of choices to everyone, regardless of the current status of attendees' inputs and preferences. In this paper, we propose Togedule, an adaptive scheduling tool that uses large language models to dynamically adjust the pool of choices and their presentation format. With the initial prototype, we conducted a formative study (N=10) and identified the potential benefits and risks of such an adaptive scheduling tool. Then, after enhancing the system, we conducted two controlled experiments, one each for attendees and organizers (total N=66). For each experiment, we compared scheduling with verbal messages, shared c
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!