Tailoring AI-Driven Reading Scaffolds to the Distinct Needs of Neurodiverse Learners
arXiv:2603.28370v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neurodiverse learners often require reading supports, yet increasing scaffold richness can sometimes overload attention and working memory rather than improve comprehension. Grounded in the Construction-Integration model and a contingent scaffolding perspective, we examine how structural versus semantic scaffolds shape comprehension and reading experience in a supervised inclusive context. Using an adapted reading interface, we compared four modalities: unmodified text, sentence-segmented text, segmented text with pictograms, and segmented text w — Soufiane Jhilal, Eleonora Pasqua, Caterina Marchesi, Riccardo Corradi, Martina Galletti
View PDF
Abstract:Neurodiverse learners often require reading supports, yet increasing scaffold richness can sometimes overload attention and working memory rather than improve comprehension. Grounded in the Construction-Integration model and a contingent scaffolding perspective, we examine how structural versus semantic scaffolds shape comprehension and reading experience in a supervised inclusive context. Using an adapted reading interface, we compared four modalities: unmodified text, sentence-segmented text, segmented text with pictograms, and segmented text with pictograms plus keyword labels. In a within-subject pilot with 14 primary-school learners with special educational needs and disabilities, we measured reading comprehension using standardized questions and collected brief child- and therapist-reported experience measures alongside open-ended feedback. Results highlight heterogeneous responses as some learners showed patterns consistent with benefits from segmentation and pictograms, while others showed patterns consistent with increased coordination costs when visual scaffolds were introduced. Experience ratings showed limited differences between modalities, with some apparent effects linked to clinical complexity, particularly for perceived ease of understanding. Open-ended feedback of the learners frequently requested simpler wording and additional visual supports. These findings suggest that no single scaffold is universally optimal, reinforcing the need for calibrated, adjustable scaffolding and provide design implications for human-AI co-regulation in supervised inclusive reading contexts.
Comments: Accepted at AIED 2026
Subjects:
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.28370 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2603.28370v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.28370
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Soufiane Jhilal [view email] [v1] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 12:38:41 UTC (887 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Consistency Amplifies: How Behavioral Variance Shapes Agent Accuracy
Analysis of behavioral consistency in large language model agents reveals that while consistent performance correlates with higher accuracy, consistency can amplify both correct and incorrect interpretations, emphasizing that accurate interpretation is more crucial than execution consistency for production deployment. (2 upvotes on HuggingFace)
Brevity Constraints Reverse Performance Hierarchies in Language Models
Large language models can underperform smaller ones due to verbose responses that introduce errors, but constraining output length reveals their superior capabilities and improves performance across benchmarks. (16 upvotes on HuggingFace)
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
Consistency Amplifies: How Behavioral Variance Shapes Agent Accuracy
Analysis of behavioral consistency in large language model agents reveals that while consistent performance correlates with higher accuracy, consistency can amplify both correct and incorrect interpretations, emphasizing that accurate interpretation is more crucial than execution consistency for production deployment. (2 upvotes on HuggingFace)
Brevity Constraints Reverse Performance Hierarchies in Language Models
Large language models can underperform smaller ones due to verbose responses that introduce errors, but constraining output length reveals their superior capabilities and improves performance across benchmarks. (16 upvotes on HuggingFace)
Reasoning Shift: How Context Silently Shortens LLM Reasoning
Reasoning behaviors in large language models compress under varied contextual conditions, potentially impacting performance on complex tasks despite maintaining accuracy on simpler ones. (22 upvotes on HuggingFace)
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!