Live
Black Hat USADark ReadingBlack Hat AsiaAI Businessv1.83.0-nightlyLiteLLM ReleasesShow HN: Tama96 – A virtual pet for your desktop, terminal, or AI agentHacker News AI TopWhy Your AI Agent Shouldn't Define WordsHacker News AI TopCaltech Researchers Claim Compression of High-Fidelity AI ModelsHacker News AI Topb8601llama.cpp ReleasesCafé, e o prompt principal para gerar as ilustrações — Temperança DigitalMedium AIAustin-based Saronic, which builds military autonomous ships, raised a $1.75B Series D led by Kleiner Perkins at a $9.25B valuation, up from $4B in Feb. 2025 (Samantha Subin/CNBC)TechmemeWe Don’t Have a Memory Problem. We Have a Knowledge Problem.Medium AII Use AI to Prepare for Every Oral Exam. Here’s Exactly How.Medium AIQuantum Machine Learning Gains Vital Reliability Checks For Data Mapping - Quantum ZeitgeistGoogle News: Machine Learningb8600llama.cpp ReleasesFalse Flags Are Killing Writers— Here’s How to Avoid Them in 2026Medium AIBlack Hat USADark ReadingBlack Hat AsiaAI Businessv1.83.0-nightlyLiteLLM ReleasesShow HN: Tama96 – A virtual pet for your desktop, terminal, or AI agentHacker News AI TopWhy Your AI Agent Shouldn't Define WordsHacker News AI TopCaltech Researchers Claim Compression of High-Fidelity AI ModelsHacker News AI Topb8601llama.cpp ReleasesCafé, e o prompt principal para gerar as ilustrações — Temperança DigitalMedium AIAustin-based Saronic, which builds military autonomous ships, raised a $1.75B Series D led by Kleiner Perkins at a $9.25B valuation, up from $4B in Feb. 2025 (Samantha Subin/CNBC)TechmemeWe Don’t Have a Memory Problem. We Have a Knowledge Problem.Medium AII Use AI to Prepare for Every Oral Exam. Here’s Exactly How.Medium AIQuantum Machine Learning Gains Vital Reliability Checks For Data Mapping - Quantum ZeitgeistGoogle News: Machine Learningb8600llama.cpp ReleasesFalse Flags Are Killing Writers— Here’s How to Avoid Them in 2026Medium AI

Corruption-robust Offline Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning From Human Feedback

arXivMarch 31, 202610 min read0 views
Source Quiz

arXiv:2603.28281v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We consider robustness against data corruption in offline multi-agent reinforcement learning from human feedback (MARLHF) under a strong-contamination model: given a dataset $D$ of trajectory-preference tuples (each preference being an $n$-dimensional binary label vector representing each of the $n$ agents' preferences), an $\epsilon$-fraction of the samples may be arbitrarily corrupted. We model the problem using the framework of linear Markov games. First, under a uniform coverage assumption - where every policy of interest is sufficiently repr — Andi Nika, Debmalya Mandal, Parameswaran Kamalaruban, Adish Singla, Goran Radanovi\'c

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:We consider robustness against data corruption in offline multi-agent reinforcement learning from human feedback (MARLHF) under a strong-contamination model: given a dataset $D$ of trajectory-preference tuples (each preference being an $n$-dimensional binary label vector representing each of the $n$ agents' preferences), an $\epsilon$-fraction of the samples may be arbitrarily corrupted. We model the problem using the framework of linear Markov games. First, under a uniform coverage assumption - where every policy of interest is sufficiently represented in the clean (prior to corruption) data - we introduce a robust estimator that guarantees an $O(\epsilon^{1 - o(1)})$ bound on the Nash equilibrium gap. Next, we move to the more challenging unilateral coverage setting, in which only a Nash equilibrium and its single-player deviations are covered. In this case, our proposed algorithm achieves an $O(\sqrt{\epsilon})$ bound on the Nash gap. Both of these procedures, however, suffer from intractable computation. To address this, we relax our solution concept to coarse correlated equilibria (CCE). Under the same unilateral coverage regime, we derive a quasi-polynomial-time algorithm whose CCE gap scales as $O(\sqrt{\epsilon})$. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic treatment of adversarial data corruption in offline MARLHF.

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2603.28281 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2603.28281v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.28281

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Andi Nika [view email] [v1] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 11:03:36 UTC (60 KB)

Was this article helpful?

Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

AI
Ask AI about this article
Powered by AI News Hub · full article context loaded
Ready

Conversation starters

Ask anything about this article…

Daily AI Digest

Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.

More about

researchpaperarxiv

Knowledge Map

Knowledge Map
TopicsEntitiesSource
Corruption-…researchpaperarxivmachine-lea…deep-learni…arXiv

Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph

This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.

Knowledge Graph100 articles · 147 connections
Scroll to zoom · drag to pan · click to open

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!

More in Research Papers