ToLL: Topological Layout Learning with Structural Multi-view Augmentation for 3D Scene Graph Pretraining
arXiv:2603.28178v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: 3D Scene Graph (3DSG) generation plays a pivotal role in spatial understanding and semantic-affordance perception. However, its generalizability is often constrained by data scarcity. Current solutions primarily focus on cross-modal assisted representation learning and object-centric generation pre-training. The former relies heavily on predicate annotations, while the latter's predicate learning may be bypassed due to strong object priors. Consequently, they could not often provide a label-free and robust self-supervised proxy task for 3DSG fine — Yucheng Huang, Luping Ji, Xiangwei Jiang, Wen Li, Mao Ye
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:3D Scene Graph (3DSG) generation plays a pivotal role in spatial understanding and semantic-affordance perception. However, its generalizability is often constrained by data scarcity. Current solutions primarily focus on cross-modal assisted representation learning and object-centric generation pre-training. The former relies heavily on predicate annotations, while the latter's predicate learning may be bypassed due to strong object priors. Consequently, they could not often provide a label-free and robust self-supervised proxy task for 3DSG fine-tuning. To bridge this gap, we propose a Topological Layout Learning (ToLL) for 3DSG pretraining framework. In detail, we design an Anchor-Conditioned Topological Geometry Reasoning, with a GNN to recover the global layout of zero-centered subgraphs by the spatial priors from sparse anchors. This process is strictly modulated by predicate features, thereby enforcing the predicate relation learning. Furthermore, we construct a Structural Multi-view Augmentation to avoid semantic corruption, and enhancing representations via self-distillation. The extensive experiments on 3DSSG dataset demonstrate that our ToLL could improve representation quality, outperforming state-of-the-art baselines.
Comments: Under Reivew
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.28178 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2603.28178v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.28178
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Yucheng Huang [view email] [v1] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 08:43:52 UTC (6,864 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
New Rowhammer attack can grant kernel-level control on Nvidia workstation GPUs
A study from researchers at UNC Chapel Hill and Georgia Tech shows that GDDR6-based Rowhammer attacks can grant kernel-level access to Linux systems equipped with GPUs based on Nvidia's Ampere and Ada Lovelace architectures. The vulnerability appears significantly more severe than what was outlined in a paper last year. Read Entire Article
![[D] ICML Reviewer Acknowledgement](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-matrix-rain-CvjLrWJiXfamUnvj5xT9J9.webp)
[D] ICML Reviewer Acknowledgement
Hi, I'm a little confused about ICML discussion period Does the period for reviewer acknowledging responses have already ended? One of the four reviewers did not present any answer to a paper of mine. Do you know if the reviewer can still change their score before April 7th? There is a reviewer comment that I will answer on Monday. Will the reviewer be able to update the score after seeing my answer? Thanks! submitted by /u/Massive_Horror9038 [link] [comments]

Considerations for growing the pie
Recently some friends and I were comparing growing the pie interventions to an increasing our friends' share of the pie intervention, and at first we mostly missed some general considerations against the latter type. 1. Decision-theoretic considerations The world is full of people with different values working towards their own ends; each of them can choose to use their resources to increase the total size of the pie or to increase their share of the pie. All of them would significantly prefer a world in which resources were used to increase the size of the pie, and this leads to a number [of] compelling justifications for each individual to cooperate. . . . by increasing the size of the pie we create a world which is better for people on average, and from behind the veil of ignorance we s
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers

New Rowhammer attack can grant kernel-level control on Nvidia workstation GPUs
A study from researchers at UNC Chapel Hill and Georgia Tech shows that GDDR6-based Rowhammer attacks can grant kernel-level access to Linux systems equipped with GPUs based on Nvidia's Ampere and Ada Lovelace architectures. The vulnerability appears significantly more severe than what was outlined in a paper last year. Read Entire Article
![[D] ICML Reviewer Acknowledgement](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-matrix-rain-CvjLrWJiXfamUnvj5xT9J9.webp)
[D] ICML Reviewer Acknowledgement
Hi, I'm a little confused about ICML discussion period Does the period for reviewer acknowledging responses have already ended? One of the four reviewers did not present any answer to a paper of mine. Do you know if the reviewer can still change their score before April 7th? There is a reviewer comment that I will answer on Monday. Will the reviewer be able to update the score after seeing my answer? Thanks! submitted by /u/Massive_Horror9038 [link] [comments]

Considerations for growing the pie
Recently some friends and I were comparing growing the pie interventions to an increasing our friends' share of the pie intervention, and at first we mostly missed some general considerations against the latter type. 1. Decision-theoretic considerations The world is full of people with different values working towards their own ends; each of them can choose to use their resources to increase the total size of the pie or to increase their share of the pie. All of them would significantly prefer a world in which resources were used to increase the size of the pie, and this leads to a number [of] compelling justifications for each individual to cooperate. . . . by increasing the size of the pie we create a world which is better for people on average, and from behind the veil of ignorance we s



Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!