Contour-Guided Query-Based Feature Fusion for Boundary-Aware and Generalizable Cardiac Ultrasound Segmentation
arXiv:2603.28110v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Accurate cardiac ultrasound segmentation is essential for reliable assessment of ventricular function in intelligent healthcare systems. However, echocardiographic images are challenging due to low contrast, speckle noise, irregular boundaries, and domain shifts across devices and patient populations. Existing methods, largely based on appearance-driven learning, often fail to preserve boundary precision and structural consistency under these conditions. To address these issues, we propose a Contour-Guided Query Refinement Network (CGQR-Net) for — Zahid Ullah, Sieun Choi, Jihie Kim
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Accurate cardiac ultrasound segmentation is essential for reliable assessment of ventricular function in intelligent healthcare systems. However, echocardiographic images are challenging due to low contrast, speckle noise, irregular boundaries, and domain shifts across devices and patient populations. Existing methods, largely based on appearance-driven learning, often fail to preserve boundary precision and structural consistency under these conditions. To address these issues, we propose a Contour-Guided Query Refinement Network (CGQR-Net) for boundary-aware cardiac ultrasound segmentation. The framework integrates multi-resolution feature representations with contour-derived structural priors. An HRNet backbone preserves high-resolution spatial details while capturing multi-scale context. A coarse segmentation is first generated, from which anatomical contours are extracted and encoded into learnable query embeddings. These contour-guided queries interact with fused feature maps via cross-attention, enabling structure-aware refinement that improves boundary delineation and reduces noise artifacts. A dual-head supervision strategy jointly optimizes segmentation and boundary prediction to enforce structural consistency. The proposed method is evaluated on the CAMUS dataset and further validated on the CardiacNet dataset to assess cross-dataset generalization. Experimental results demonstrate improved segmentation accuracy, enhanced boundary precision, and robust performance across varying imaging conditions. These results highlight the effectiveness of integrating contour-level structural information with feature-level representations for reliable cardiac ultrasound segmentation.
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.28110 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2603.28110v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.28110
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Zahid Ullah [view email] [v1] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 07:17:40 UTC (5,431 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
New Rowhammer attack can grant kernel-level control on Nvidia workstation GPUs
A study from researchers at UNC Chapel Hill and Georgia Tech shows that GDDR6-based Rowhammer attacks can grant kernel-level access to Linux systems equipped with GPUs based on Nvidia's Ampere and Ada Lovelace architectures. The vulnerability appears significantly more severe than what was outlined in a paper last year. Read Entire Article
![[D] ICML Reviewer Acknowledgement](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-matrix-rain-CvjLrWJiXfamUnvj5xT9J9.webp)
[D] ICML Reviewer Acknowledgement
Hi, I'm a little confused about ICML discussion period Does the period for reviewer acknowledging responses have already ended? One of the four reviewers did not present any answer to a paper of mine. Do you know if the reviewer can still change their score before April 7th? There is a reviewer comment that I will answer on Monday. Will the reviewer be able to update the score after seeing my answer? Thanks! submitted by /u/Massive_Horror9038 [link] [comments]
Considerations for growing the pie
Recently some friends and I were comparing growing the pie interventions to an increasing our friends' share of the pie intervention, and at first we mostly missed some general considerations against the latter type. 1. Decision-theoretic considerations The world is full of people with different values working towards their own ends; each of them can choose to use their resources to increase the total size of the pie or to increase their share of the pie. All of them would significantly prefer a world in which resources were used to increase the size of the pie, and this leads to a number [of] compelling justifications for each individual to cooperate. . . . by increasing the size of the pie we create a world which is better for people on average, and from behind the veil of ignorance we s
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
New Rowhammer attack can grant kernel-level control on Nvidia workstation GPUs
A study from researchers at UNC Chapel Hill and Georgia Tech shows that GDDR6-based Rowhammer attacks can grant kernel-level access to Linux systems equipped with GPUs based on Nvidia's Ampere and Ada Lovelace architectures. The vulnerability appears significantly more severe than what was outlined in a paper last year. Read Entire Article
[D] ICML Reviewer Acknowledgement
Hi, I'm a little confused about ICML discussion period Does the period for reviewer acknowledging responses have already ended? One of the four reviewers did not present any answer to a paper of mine. Do you know if the reviewer can still change their score before April 7th? There is a reviewer comment that I will answer on Monday. Will the reviewer be able to update the score after seeing my answer? Thanks! submitted by /u/Massive_Horror9038 [link] [comments]
Considerations for growing the pie
Recently some friends and I were comparing growing the pie interventions to an increasing our friends' share of the pie intervention, and at first we mostly missed some general considerations against the latter type. 1. Decision-theoretic considerations The world is full of people with different values working towards their own ends; each of them can choose to use their resources to increase the total size of the pie or to increase their share of the pie. All of them would significantly prefer a world in which resources were used to increase the size of the pie, and this leads to a number [of] compelling justifications for each individual to cooperate. . . . by increasing the size of the pie we create a world which is better for people on average, and from behind the veil of ignorance we s
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!