Beyond the Answer: Decoding the Behavior of LLMs as Scientific Reasoners

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:As Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve increasingly sophisticated performance on complex reasoning tasks, current architectures serve as critical proxies for the internal heuristics of frontier models. Characterizing emergent reasoning is vital for long-term interpretability and safety. Furthermore, understanding how prompting modulates these processes is essential, as natural language will likely be the primary interface for interacting with AGI systems. In this work, we use a custom variant of Genetic Pareto (GEPA) to systematically optimize prompts for scientific reasoning tasks, and analyze how prompting can affect reasoning behavior. We investigate the structural patterns and logical heuristics inherent in GEPA-optimized prompts, and evaluate their transferability and brittleness. Our findings reveal that gains in scientific reasoning often correspond to model-specific heuristics that fail to generalize across systems, which we call "local" logic. By framing prompt optimization as a tool for model interpretability, we argue that mapping these preferred reasoning structures for LLMs is an important prerequisite for effectively collaborating with superhuman intelligence.

Comments: Accepted at the Post-AGI Science and Society Workshop at ICLR 2026

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2603.28038 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2603.28038v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.28038

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Michael Li [view email] [v1] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 05:01:07 UTC (256 KB)