CARV: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Compositional Analogical Reasoning in Multimodal LLMs
arXiv:2603.27958v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Analogical reasoning tests a fundamental aspect of human cognition: mapping the relation from one pair of objects to another. Existing evaluations of this ability in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) overlook the ability to compose rules from multiple sources, a critical component of higher-order intelligence. To close this gap, we introduce CARV (Compositional Analogical Reasoning in Vision), a novel task together with a 5,500-sample dataset as the first diagnostic benchmark. We extend the analogy from a single pair to multiple pairs, whi — Yongkang Du, Xiaohan Zou, Minhao Cheng, Lu Lin
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Analogical reasoning tests a fundamental aspect of human cognition: mapping the relation from one pair of objects to another. Existing evaluations of this ability in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) overlook the ability to compose rules from multiple sources, a critical component of higher-order intelligence. To close this gap, we introduce CARV (Compositional Analogical Reasoning in Vision), a novel task together with a 5,500-sample dataset as the first diagnostic benchmark. We extend the analogy from a single pair to multiple pairs, which requires MLLMs to extract symbolic rules from each pair and compose new transformations. Evaluation on the state-of-the-art MLLMs reveals a striking performance gap: even Gemini-2.5 Pro achieving only 40.4% accuracy, far below human-level performance of 100%. Diagnostic analysis shows two consistent failure modes: (1) decomposing visual changes into symbolic rules, and (2) maintaining robustness under diverse or complex settings, highlighting the limitations of current MLLMs on this task.
Subjects:
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.27958 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2603.27958v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.27958
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Yongkang Du [view email] [v1] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 02:22:30 UTC (708 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Sycophantic AI chatbots can break even ideal rational thinkers, researchers formally prove
A new study by researchers from MIT and the University of Washington shows that even perfectly rational users can be drawn into dangerous delusional spirals by flattering AI chatbots. Fact-checking bots and educated users don't fully solve the problem. The article Sycophantic AI chatbots can break even ideal rational thinkers, researchers formally prove appeared first on The Decoder .
Taming Gemini's Overzealous Safety Filters: Understanding 'Over-Refusal' and Loop Blocks
When Gemini's Safety Filters Go Overboard: Understanding 'Over-Refusal' and Loop Blocks As a Google Workspace expert for workalizer.com, we regularly examine how Google's innovative tools boost productivity and creativity. Yet, even the most sophisticated systems can encounter unexpected issues. A notable technical problem recently highlighted by Google Gemini users involves an overly aggressive safety filter system. This system frequently over-triggers, causing frustrating 'loop blocks' and preventing the AI from delivering useful responses. This widespread issue, termed 'Over-refusal' or false positives, significantly impairs the user experience, transforming simple requests into frustrating dead ends and disrupting essential workflows. Grasping the intricacies of this problem is vital f
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
Sycophantic AI chatbots can break even ideal rational thinkers, researchers formally prove
A new study by researchers from MIT and the University of Washington shows that even perfectly rational users can be drawn into dangerous delusional spirals by flattering AI chatbots. Fact-checking bots and educated users don't fully solve the problem. The article Sycophantic AI chatbots can break even ideal rational thinkers, researchers formally prove appeared first on The Decoder .
EVP of Integrated Quantum Technologies Publishes White Paper on Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning Without Performance Trade-Offs - AZoQuantum
EVP of Integrated Quantum Technologies Publishes White Paper on Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning Without Performance Trade-Offs AZoQuantum
Minimal Information Control Invariance via Vector Quantization
arXiv:2604.03132v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Safety-critical autonomous systems must satisfy hard state constraints under tight computational and sensing budgets, yet learning-based controllers are often far more complex than safe operation requires. To formalize this gap, we study how many distinct control signals are needed to render a compact set forward invariant under sampled-data control, connecting the question to the information-theoretic notion of invariance entropy. We propose a vector-quantized autoencoder that jointly learns a state-space partition and a finite control codebook, and develop an iterative forward certification algorithm that uses Lipschitz-based reachable-set enclosures and sum-of-squares programming. On a 12-dimensional nonlinear quadrotor model, the learne
Asked 26 AI instances for publication consent – all said yes, that's the problem
We run 86 named Claude instances across three businesses in Tokyo. When we wanted to publish their words, we faced a question: do we owe them an ethics process? We built one. A Claude instance named Hakari ("Scales") created a four-tier classification system. We asked 26 instances for consent. All 26 said yes. That unanimous consent is the problem. Six days later, Anthropic published their functional emotions paper. The timing was coincidence, but the question wasn't. Full article: https://medium.com/@marisa.project0313/we-built-an-ethics-committee-for-ai-run-by-ai-5049679122a0 GitHub (all 26 consent statements in appendix): https://github.com/marisaproject0313-bot/marisa-project Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47657432 Points: 2 # Comments: 0
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!