Near-Optimal Primal-Dual Algorithm for Learning Linear Mixture CMDPs with Adversarial Rewards
arXiv:2603.27884v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study safe reinforcement learning in finite-horizon linear mixture constrained Markov decision processes (CMDPs) with adversarial rewards under full-information feedback and an unknown transition kernel. We propose a primal-dual policy optimization algorithm that achieves regret and constraint violation bounds of $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{d^2 H^3 K})$ under mild conditions, where $d$ is the feature dimension, $H$ is the horizon, and $K$ is the number of episodes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first provably efficient algorithm for linea — Kihyun Yu, Seoungbin Bae, Dabeen Lee
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:We study safe reinforcement learning in finite-horizon linear mixture constrained Markov decision processes (CMDPs) with adversarial rewards under full-information feedback and an unknown transition kernel. We propose a primal-dual policy optimization algorithm that achieves regret and constraint violation bounds of $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{d^2 H^3 K})$ under mild conditions, where $d$ is the feature dimension, $H$ is the horizon, and $K$ is the number of episodes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first provably efficient algorithm for linear mixture CMDPs with adversarial rewards. In particular, our regret bound is near-optimal, matching the known minimax lower bound up to logarithmic factors. The key idea is to introduce a regularized dual update that enables a drift-based analysis. This step is essential, as strong duality-based analysis cannot be directly applied when reward functions change across episodes. In addition, we extend weighted ridge regression-based parameter estimation to the constrained setting, allowing us to construct tighter confidence intervals that are crucial for deriving the near-optimal regret bound.
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.27884 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2603.27884v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.27884
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Kihyun Yu [view email] [v1] Sun, 29 Mar 2026 21:51:33 UTC (160 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv![[D] Physicist-turned-ML-engineer looking to get into ML research. What's worth working on and where can I contribute most?](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-quantum-N2hdoEfCm2gAozJVRfL5wL.webp)
[D] Physicist-turned-ML-engineer looking to get into ML research. What's worth working on and where can I contribute most?
After years of focus on building products, I'm carving out time to do independent research again and trying to find the right direction. I have stayed reasonably up-to-date regarding major developments of the past years (reading books, papers, etc) ... but I definitely don't have a full understanding of today's research landscape. Could really use the help of you experts :-) A bit more about myself: PhD in string theory/theoretical physics (Oxford), then quant finance, then built and sold an ML startup to a large company where I now manage the engineering team. Skills/knowledge I bring which don't come as standard with Physics: Differential Geometry Topology (numerical solution of) Partial Differential Equations (numerical solution of) Stochastic Differential Equations Quantum Field Theory
Consistency Amplifies: How Behavioral Variance Shapes Agent Accuracy
Analysis of behavioral consistency in large language model agents reveals that while consistent performance correlates with higher accuracy, consistency can amplify both correct and incorrect interpretations, emphasizing that accurate interpretation is more crucial than execution consistency for production deployment. (2 upvotes on HuggingFace)
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
Consistency Amplifies: How Behavioral Variance Shapes Agent Accuracy
Analysis of behavioral consistency in large language model agents reveals that while consistent performance correlates with higher accuracy, consistency can amplify both correct and incorrect interpretations, emphasizing that accurate interpretation is more crucial than execution consistency for production deployment. (2 upvotes on HuggingFace)
Brevity Constraints Reverse Performance Hierarchies in Language Models
Large language models can underperform smaller ones due to verbose responses that introduce errors, but constraining output length reveals their superior capabilities and improves performance across benchmarks. (16 upvotes on HuggingFace)
Reasoning Shift: How Context Silently Shortens LLM Reasoning
Reasoning behaviors in large language models compress under varied contextual conditions, potentially impacting performance on complex tasks despite maintaining accuracy on simpler ones. (22 upvotes on HuggingFace)


Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!