RG-TTA: Regime-Guided Meta-Control for Test-Time Adaptation in Streaming Time Series
arXiv:2603.27814v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Test-time adaptation (TTA) enables neural forecasters to adapt to distribution shifts in streaming time series, but existing methods apply the same adaptation intensity regardless of the nature of the shift. We propose Regime-Guided Test-Time Adaptation (RG-TTA), a meta-controller that continuously modulates adaptation intensity based on distributional similarity to previously-seen regimes. Using an ensemble of Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Wasserstein-1, feature-distance, and variance-ratio metrics, RG-TTA computes a similarity score for each incoming bat — Indar Kumar, Akanksha Tiwari, Sai Krishna Jasti, Ankit Hemant Lade
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Test-time adaptation (TTA) enables neural forecasters to adapt to distribution shifts in streaming time series, but existing methods apply the same adaptation intensity regardless of the nature of the shift. We propose Regime-Guided Test-Time Adaptation (RG-TTA), a meta-controller that continuously modulates adaptation intensity based on distributional similarity to previously-seen regimes. Using an ensemble of Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Wasserstein-1, feature-distance, and variance-ratio metrics, RG-TTA computes a similarity score for each incoming batch and uses it to (i) smoothly scale the learning rate -- more aggressive for novel distributions, conservative for familiar ones -- and (ii) control gradient effort via loss-driven early stopping rather than fixed budgets, allowing the system to allocate exactly the effort each batch requires. As a supplementary mechanism, RG-TTA gates checkpoint reuse from a regime memory, loading stored specialist models only when they demonstrably outperform the current model (loss improvement >= 30%). RG-TTA is model-agnostic and strategy-composable: it wraps any forecaster exposing train/predict/save/load interfaces and enhances any gradient-based TTA method. We demonstrate three compositions -- RG-TTA, RG-EWC, and RG-DynaTTA -- and evaluate 6 update policies (3 baselines + 3 regime-guided variants) across 4 compact architectures (GRU, iTransformer, PatchTST, DLinear), 14 datasets (6 real-world multivariate benchmarks + 8 synthetic regime scenarios), and 4 forecast horizons (96, 192, 336, 720) under a streaming evaluation protocol with 3 random seeds (672 experiments total). Regime-guided policies achieve the lowest MSE in 156 of 224 seed-averaged experiments (69.6%), with RG-EWC winning 30.4% and RG-TTA winning 29.0%. Overall, RG-TTA reduces MSE by 5.7% vs TTA while running 5.5% faster; RG-EWC reduces MSE by 14.1% vs standalone EWC.
Comments: 18 pages, 8 figures
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
MSC classes: 68T07
ACM classes: I.2.6; I.5.4
Cite as: arXiv:2603.27814 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2603.27814v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.27814
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Indar Kumar [view email] [v1] Sun, 29 Mar 2026 18:57:34 UTC (136 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Looking for Help on Building a Cheap/Budget Dedicated AI System
I’ve been getting into the whole AI field over the course of the year and I’ve strictly said to NEVER use cloud based AI (Or under VERY strict and specific circumstances). For example, i was using Opencode’s cloud servers, but only because it was through their own community maintained infrastructure/servers and also it was about as secure as it gets when it comes to cloud AI. But anything else is a hard NO. I’ve been using my main machine (Specs on user) and so far it’s been pretty good. Depending on the model, I can run 30-40B models at about 25-35 tok/s, which for me is completely usable, anything under or close to 10 tok/s is pretty unusable for me. But anyways, that has been great for me, but I’m slowly running into VRAM and GPU limitations, so I think it’s time to get some dedicated h
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers

Request for arXiv cs.AI Endorsement – Life-Aligned AI Framework
Hi everyone, I’m preparing to submit a paper to arXiv (cs.AI, with cross-lists to q-bio.PE and physics.soc-ph) and am currently awaiting endorsement from a qualified author. Posting here in case anyone in this community can help or knows someone who can. Title: Life-Aligned AI: A Framework for Grounding Artificial Intelligence in the Empirical Conditions of Flourishing Here’s the main idea: Current alignment approaches work backwards — rules imposed in advance by minds that the systems they constrain may eventually exceed. This paper proposes a different starting point: training AI on living systems — the only adaptive framework continuously pressure-tested across four billion years under conditions of genuine consequence — and letting the operating principles emerge from genuine reasoning




![Thoughts on AI and Research [pdf]](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-robot-hand-JvPW6jsLFTCtkgtb97Kys5.webp)
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!