OpenDPR: Open-Vocabulary Change Detection via Vision-Centric Diffusion-Guided Prototype Retrieval for Remote Sensing Imagery
arXiv:2603.27645v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Open-vocabulary change detection (OVCD) seeks to recognize arbitrary changes of interest by enabling generalization beyond a fixed set of predefined classes. We reformulate OVCD as a two-stage pipeline: first generate class-agnostic change proposals using visual foundation models (VFMs) such as SAM and DINOv2, and then perform category identification with vision-language models (VLMs) such as CLIP. We reveal that category identification errors are the primary bottleneck of OVCD, mainly due to the limited ability of VLMs based on image-text matchi — Qi Guo, Jue Wang, Yinhe Liu, Yanfei Zhong
View PDF
Abstract:Open-vocabulary change detection (OVCD) seeks to recognize arbitrary changes of interest by enabling generalization beyond a fixed set of predefined classes. We reformulate OVCD as a two-stage pipeline: first generate class-agnostic change proposals using visual foundation models (VFMs) such as SAM and DINOv2, and then perform category identification with vision-language models (VLMs) such as CLIP. We reveal that category identification errors are the primary bottleneck of OVCD, mainly due to the limited ability of VLMs based on image-text matching to represent fine-grained land-cover categories. To address this, we propose OpenDPR, a training-free vision-centric diffusion-guided prototype retrieval framework. OpenDPR leverages diffusion models to construct diverse prototypes for target categories offline, and to perform similarity retrieval with change proposals in the visual space during inference. The secondary bottleneck lies in change localization, due to the inherent lack of change priors in VFMs. To bridge this gap, we design a spatial-to-change weakly supervised change detection module named S2C to adapt their strong spatial modeling capabilities for change localization. Integrating the pretrained S2C into OpenDPR leads to an optional weakly supervised variant named OpenDPR-W, which further improves OVCD with minimal supervision. Experimental results on four benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed methods achieve state-of-the-art performance under both supervision modes. Code is available at this https URL.
Comments: Accepted by CVPR 2026
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.27645 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2603.27645v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.27645
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Qi Guo [view email] [v1] Sun, 29 Mar 2026 11:43:02 UTC (867 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
New Rowhammer attack can grant kernel-level control on Nvidia workstation GPUs
A study from researchers at UNC Chapel Hill and Georgia Tech shows that GDDR6-based Rowhammer attacks can grant kernel-level access to Linux systems equipped with GPUs based on Nvidia's Ampere and Ada Lovelace architectures. The vulnerability appears significantly more severe than what was outlined in a paper last year. Read Entire Article
![[D] ICML Reviewer Acknowledgement](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-matrix-rain-CvjLrWJiXfamUnvj5xT9J9.webp)
[D] ICML Reviewer Acknowledgement
Hi, I'm a little confused about ICML discussion period Does the period for reviewer acknowledging responses have already ended? One of the four reviewers did not present any answer to a paper of mine. Do you know if the reviewer can still change their score before April 7th? There is a reviewer comment that I will answer on Monday. Will the reviewer be able to update the score after seeing my answer? Thanks! submitted by /u/Massive_Horror9038 [link] [comments]
Considerations for growing the pie
Recently some friends and I were comparing growing the pie interventions to an increasing our friends' share of the pie intervention, and at first we mostly missed some general considerations against the latter type. 1. Decision-theoretic considerations The world is full of people with different values working towards their own ends; each of them can choose to use their resources to increase the total size of the pie or to increase their share of the pie. All of them would significantly prefer a world in which resources were used to increase the size of the pie, and this leads to a number [of] compelling justifications for each individual to cooperate. . . . by increasing the size of the pie we create a world which is better for people on average, and from behind the veil of ignorance we s
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
New Rowhammer attack can grant kernel-level control on Nvidia workstation GPUs
A study from researchers at UNC Chapel Hill and Georgia Tech shows that GDDR6-based Rowhammer attacks can grant kernel-level access to Linux systems equipped with GPUs based on Nvidia's Ampere and Ada Lovelace architectures. The vulnerability appears significantly more severe than what was outlined in a paper last year. Read Entire Article
[D] ICML Reviewer Acknowledgement
Hi, I'm a little confused about ICML discussion period Does the period for reviewer acknowledging responses have already ended? One of the four reviewers did not present any answer to a paper of mine. Do you know if the reviewer can still change their score before April 7th? There is a reviewer comment that I will answer on Monday. Will the reviewer be able to update the score after seeing my answer? Thanks! submitted by /u/Massive_Horror9038 [link] [comments]
Considerations for growing the pie
Recently some friends and I were comparing growing the pie interventions to an increasing our friends' share of the pie intervention, and at first we mostly missed some general considerations against the latter type. 1. Decision-theoretic considerations The world is full of people with different values working towards their own ends; each of them can choose to use their resources to increase the total size of the pie or to increase their share of the pie. All of them would significantly prefer a world in which resources were used to increase the size of the pie, and this leads to a number [of] compelling justifications for each individual to cooperate. . . . by increasing the size of the pie we create a world which is better for people on average, and from behind the veil of ignorance we s
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!