Live
Black Hat USAAI BusinessBlack Hat AsiaAI BusinessWhich countries use ChatGPT the most? New study reveals top 5 - Deseret NewsGoogle News: ChatGPTOpenAI Is Letting Individuals Invest in Its $852 Billion Valuation—Here’s How - inc.comGoogle News: OpenAITransition From Data Scientist to Machine Learning Engineer 2026 Guide - Interview Kickstart Publishes New Career Guide - The Manila TimesGoogle News: Machine LearningValuations are 'Punchy': Salesforce's DrewsBloomberg TechnologyEarly AI Use Risks Children’s Development, Safety: UN - Mexico Business NewsGoogle News: AI SafetyAI blueprints can be stolen with a single small antennaTechXplore AIYou Have to Start Early in AI: Axiom Founder VenkatachalamBloomberg TechnologyAI and the Work-Product Doctrine: A New Frontier - callaborlaw.comGoogle News: AICompliance Policies: AI Policy & Upcoming Incident Response Plan Deadline - natlawreview.comGoogle News: AIIntegration in the Wealth Management Industry - wealthmanagement.comGoogle News: AI‘Boring’ Liberty Formula One Upgraded To Buy at Bank of AmericaBloomberg TechnologyCan You Run a Computer Without RAM? Surprisingly, Yes—But You’ll Be MiserableGizmodoBlack Hat USAAI BusinessBlack Hat AsiaAI BusinessWhich countries use ChatGPT the most? New study reveals top 5 - Deseret NewsGoogle News: ChatGPTOpenAI Is Letting Individuals Invest in Its $852 Billion Valuation—Here’s How - inc.comGoogle News: OpenAITransition From Data Scientist to Machine Learning Engineer 2026 Guide - Interview Kickstart Publishes New Career Guide - The Manila TimesGoogle News: Machine LearningValuations are 'Punchy': Salesforce's DrewsBloomberg TechnologyEarly AI Use Risks Children’s Development, Safety: UN - Mexico Business NewsGoogle News: AI SafetyAI blueprints can be stolen with a single small antennaTechXplore AIYou Have to Start Early in AI: Axiom Founder VenkatachalamBloomberg TechnologyAI and the Work-Product Doctrine: A New Frontier - callaborlaw.comGoogle News: AICompliance Policies: AI Policy & Upcoming Incident Response Plan Deadline - natlawreview.comGoogle News: AIIntegration in the Wealth Management Industry - wealthmanagement.comGoogle News: AI‘Boring’ Liberty Formula One Upgraded To Buy at Bank of AmericaBloomberg TechnologyCan You Run a Computer Without RAM? Surprisingly, Yes—But You’ll Be MiserableGizmodo

What does a system modify when it modifies itself?

arXivMarch 31, 202610 min read0 views
Source Quiz

arXiv:2603.27611v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When a cognitive system modifies its own functioning, what exactly does it modify: a low-level rule, a control rule, or the norm that evaluates its own revisions? Cognitive science describes executive control, metacognition, and hierarchical learning with precision, but lacks a formal framework distinguishing these targets of transformation. Contemporary artificial intelligence likewise exhibits self-modification without common criteria for comparison with biological cognition. We show that the question of what counts as a self-modifying system e — Florentin Koch

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:When a cognitive system modifies its own functioning, what exactly does it modify: a low-level rule, a control rule, or the norm that evaluates its own revisions? Cognitive science describes executive control, metacognition, and hierarchical learning with precision, but lacks a formal framework distinguishing these targets of transformation. Contemporary artificial intelligence likewise exhibits self-modification without common criteria for comparison with biological cognition. We show that the question of what counts as a self-modifying system entails a minimal structure: a hierarchy of rules, a fixed core, and a distinction between effective rules, represented rules, and causally accessible rules. Four regimes are identified: (1) action without modification, (2) low-level modification, (3) structural modification, and (4) teleological revision. Each regime is anchored in a cognitive phenomenon and a corresponding artificial system. Applied to humans, the framework yields a central result: a crossing of opacities. Humans have self-representation and causal power concentrated at upper hierarchical levels, while operational levels remain largely opaque. Reflexive artificial systems display the inverse profile: rich representation and causal access at operational levels, but none at the highest evaluative level. This crossed asymmetry provides a structural signature for human-AI comparison. The framework also offers insight into artificial consciousness, with higher-order theories and Attention Schema Theory as special cases. We derive four testable predictions and identify four open problems: the independence of transformativity and autonomy, the viability of self-modification, the teleological lock, and identity under transformation.

Comments: Working Paper

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Neurons and Cognition (q-bio.NC)

Cite as: arXiv:2603.27611 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2603.27611v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.27611

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Florentin Koch [view email] [v1] Sun, 29 Mar 2026 10:12:15 UTC (113 KB)

Was this article helpful?

Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

AI
Ask AI about this article
Powered by AI News Hub · full article context loaded
Ready

Conversation starters

Ask anything about this article…

Daily AI Digest

Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.

More about

researchpaperarxiv

Knowledge Map

Knowledge Map
TopicsEntitiesSource
What does a…researchpaperarxivaiartificial-…arXiv

Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph

This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.

Knowledge Graph100 articles · 131 connections
Scroll to zoom · drag to pan · click to open

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!

More in Research Papers