MV-RoMa: From Pairwise Matching into Multi-View Track Reconstruction
arXiv:2603.27542v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Establishing consistent correspondences across images is essential for 3D vision tasks such as structure-from-motion (SfM), yet most existing matchers operate in a pairwise manner, often producing fragmented and geometrically inconsistent tracks when their predictions are chained across views. We propose MV-RoMa, a multi-view dense matching model that jointly estimates dense correspondences from a source image to multiple co-visible targets. Specifically, we design an efficient model architecture which avoids high computational cost of full cross — Jongmin Lee, Seungyeop Kang, Sungjoo Yoo
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Establishing consistent correspondences across images is essential for 3D vision tasks such as structure-from-motion (SfM), yet most existing matchers operate in a pairwise manner, often producing fragmented and geometrically inconsistent tracks when their predictions are chained across views. We propose MV-RoMa, a multi-view dense matching model that jointly estimates dense correspondences from a source image to multiple co-visible targets. Specifically, we design an efficient model architecture which avoids high computational cost of full cross-attention for multi-view feature interaction: (i) multi-view encoder that leverages pair-wise matching results as a geometric prior, and (ii) multi-view matching refiner that refines correspondences using pixel-wise attention. Additionally, we propose a post-processing strategy that integrates our model's consistent multi-view correspondences as high-quality tracks for SfM. Across diverse and challenging benchmarks, MV-RoMa produces more reliable correspondences and substantially denser, more accurate 3D reconstructions than existing sparse and dense matching methods. Project page: this https URL.
Comments: CVPR 2026 Accepted
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.27542 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2603.27542v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.27542
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: JongMin Lee [view email] [v1] Sun, 29 Mar 2026 06:50:21 UTC (27,276 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv![[D] ICML 2026 Average Score](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-graph-nodes-a2pnJLpyKmDnxKWLd5BEAb.webp)
[D] ICML 2026 Average Score
Hi all, I’m curious about the current review dynamics for ICML 2026, especially after the rebuttal phase. For those who are reviewers (or have insight into the process), could you share what the average scores look like in your batch after rebuttal? Also, do tools like trackers https://papercopilot.com/statistics/icml-statistics/icml-2026-statistics/ reflect true Score distributions to some degree. Appreciate any insights. submitted by /u/Hope999991 [link] [comments]
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.



![[D] CVPR 2026 Travel Grant/Registration Waiver](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-circuit-gold-PMJWD5qsqGfXwX8w9a97Cb.webp)



Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!