Live
Black Hat USAAI BusinessBlack Hat AsiaAI BusinessDesktop Canary v2.1.48-canary.31LobeChat ReleasesThe Invisible Broken Clock in AI Video GenerationHackernoon AIMean field sequence: an introductionLessWrong AISwift package AI inference engine generated from Rust crateHacker News AI TopZeta-2 Turns Code Edits Into Context-Aware Rewrite SuggestionsHackernoon AIAI Tools That Actually Pay You Back: A Developer's Guide to Monetizing AIDev.to AIThe $6 Million Shockwave: How DeepSeek Just Broke the AI MonopolyMedium AIHow I Got My First Freelance Client in 3 Days (Using AI) — Beginner Guide (India 2026)Medium AIWhy Your Resume Gets Rejected Before a Human Sees It (And How to Fix It)Dev.to AII've Been Saying RAG Is Dead Since 2020Medium AIAI Print-on-Demand Passive Income: ₹400-2K/Design from HomeDev.to AIFaceless YouTube Automation with AI: Complete Guide 2026Dev.to AIBlack Hat USAAI BusinessBlack Hat AsiaAI BusinessDesktop Canary v2.1.48-canary.31LobeChat ReleasesThe Invisible Broken Clock in AI Video GenerationHackernoon AIMean field sequence: an introductionLessWrong AISwift package AI inference engine generated from Rust crateHacker News AI TopZeta-2 Turns Code Edits Into Context-Aware Rewrite SuggestionsHackernoon AIAI Tools That Actually Pay You Back: A Developer's Guide to Monetizing AIDev.to AIThe $6 Million Shockwave: How DeepSeek Just Broke the AI MonopolyMedium AIHow I Got My First Freelance Client in 3 Days (Using AI) — Beginner Guide (India 2026)Medium AIWhy Your Resume Gets Rejected Before a Human Sees It (And How to Fix It)Dev.to AII've Been Saying RAG Is Dead Since 2020Medium AIAI Print-on-Demand Passive Income: ₹400-2K/Design from HomeDev.to AIFaceless YouTube Automation with AI: Complete Guide 2026Dev.to AI
AI NEWS HUBbyEIGENVECTOREigenvector

Dual-Stage LLM Framework for Scenario-Centric Semantic Interpretation in Driving Assistance

arXivby [Submitted on 29 Mar 2026]March 31, 20262 min read4 views
Source Quiz
🧒Explain Like I'm 5Simple language

Hey there, little explorer! Imagine your toy car is super smart, like a robot! 🚗💨

Sometimes, this smart toy car tries to understand what's happening around it, like if a ball rolls into the street or a friend is walking.

Scientists are teaching these smart car brains (we call them "LLMs," like super-duper talking robots!) to be extra careful. They want to make sure the car knows when something is a little bit risky or very, very risky.

This paper is like a special game where they test the smart car brains. They show them pictures and tell them stories about driving, then ask, "Is this safe or not?" 🚦

They found that sometimes, even smart robot brains don't always agree on what's risky. So, they're working hard to teach them to be super clear and safe, especially when people are nearby! It's like making sure your toy car always knows to stop for your teddy bear! 🐻🛑

arXiv:2603.27536v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) increasingly rely on learning-based perception, yet safety-relevant failures often arise without component malfunction, driven instead by partial observability and semantic ambiguity in how risk is interpreted and communicated. This paper presents a scenario-centric framework for reproducible auditing of LLM-based risk reasoning in urban driving contexts. Deterministic, temporally bounded scenario windows are constructed from multimodal driving data and evaluated under fixed prompt constraints and a close — Jean Douglas Carvalho, Hugo Taciro Kenji, Ahmad Mohammad Saber, Glaucia Melo, Max Mauro Dias Santos, Deepa Kundur

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) increasingly rely on learning-based perception, yet safety-relevant failures often arise without component malfunction, driven instead by partial observability and semantic ambiguity in how risk is interpreted and communicated. This paper presents a scenario-centric framework for reproducible auditing of LLM-based risk reasoning in urban driving contexts. Deterministic, temporally bounded scenario windows are constructed from multimodal driving data and evaluated under fixed prompt constraints and a closed numeric risk schema, ensuring structured and comparable outputs across models. Experiments on a curated near-people scenario set compare two text-only models and one multimodal model under identical inputs and prompts. Results reveal systematic inter-model divergence in severity assignment, high-risk escalation, evidence use, and causal attribution. Disagreement extends to the interpretation of vulnerable road user presence, indicating that variability often reflects intrinsic semantic indeterminacy rather than isolated model failure. These findings highlight the importance of scenario-centric auditing and explicit ambiguity management when integrating LLM-based reasoning into safety-aligned driver assistance systems.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2603.27536 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2603.27536v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.27536

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Jean Carvalho [view email] [v1] Sun, 29 Mar 2026 06:20:08 UTC (4,637 KB)

Was this article helpful?

Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

AI
Ask AI about this article
Powered by Eigenvector · full article context loaded
Ready

Conversation starters

Ask anything about this article…

Daily AI Digest

Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.

More about

researchpaperarxiv

Knowledge Map

Knowledge Map
TopicsEntitiesSource
Dual-Stage …researchpaperarxivaiartificial-…arXiv

Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph

This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.

Knowledge Graph100 articles · 178 connections
Scroll to zoom · drag to pan · click to open

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!

More in Research Papers