Visualization of Machine Learning Models through Their Spatial and Temporal Listeners
arXiv:2603.27527v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Model visualization (ModelVis) has emerged as a major research direction, yet existing taxonomies are largely organized by data or tasks, making it difficult to treat models as first-class analysis objects. We present a model-centric two-stage framework that employs abstract listeners to capture spatial and temporal model behaviors, and then connects the translated model behavior data to the classical InfoVis pipeline. To apply the framework at scale, we build a retrieval-augmented human--large language model (LLM) extraction workflow and curate — Siyu Wu, Lei Shi, Lei Xia, Cenyang Wu, Zipeng Liu, Yingchaojie Feng, Liang Zhou, Wei Chen
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Model visualization (ModelVis) has emerged as a major research direction, yet existing taxonomies are largely organized by data or tasks, making it difficult to treat models as first-class analysis objects. We present a model-centric two-stage framework that employs abstract listeners to capture spatial and temporal model behaviors, and then connects the translated model behavior data to the classical InfoVis pipeline. To apply the framework at scale, we build a retrieval-augmented human--large language model (LLM) extraction workflow and curate a corpus of 128 VIS/VAST ModelVis papers with 331 coded figures. Our analysis shows a dominant result-centric priority on visualizing model outcomes, quantitative/nominal data type, statistical charts, and performance evaluation. Citation-weighted trends further indicate that less frequent model-mechanism-oriented studies have disproportionately high impact while are less investigated recently. Overall, the framework is a general approach for comparing existing ModelVis systems and guiding possible future designs.
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.27527 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2603.27527v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.27527
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Siyu Wu [view email] [v1] Sun, 29 Mar 2026 05:41:37 UTC (6,938 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Is Turboquant really a game changer?
I am currently utilizing qwen3.5 and Gemma 4 model. Realized Gemma 4 requires 2x ram for same context length. As far as I understand, what turbo quant gives is quantizing kv cache into about 4 bit and minimize the loses But Q8 still not lose the context that much so isn't kv cache ram for qwen 3.5 q8 and Gemma 4 truboquant is the same? Is turboquant also applicable in qwen's cache architecture? because as far as I know they didn't tested it in qwen3.5 style kv cache in their paper. Just curious, I started to learn local LLM recently submitted by /u/Interesting-Print366 [link] [comments]
Found how to toggle reasoning mode for Gemma in LM-Studio!
I’ve figured out how to trigger the reasoning process by adding "/think" to the system prompt. Heads up: the thought tags have an unusual pipe ( | ) placement, which is why many LLM fail to parse the reasoning section correctly. So Start String is : " thought" And End String is " " Here is the Jinja template: https://pastebin.com/MGmD8UiC Tested and working with the 26B and 31B versions. submitted by /u/Adventurous-Paper566 [link] [comments]
AI companions can comfort lonely users but may deepen distress over time
AI companions are always available, never judge, never tire and never demand anything in return. If someone is struggling with loneliness, this frictionlessness can seem profoundly appealing. However, new research shows that in the long term, seeking emotional support from an AI companion can pull users away from important human relationships.
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
New Rowhammer attack can grant kernel-level control on Nvidia workstation GPUs
A study from researchers at UNC Chapel Hill and Georgia Tech shows that GDDR6-based Rowhammer attacks can grant kernel-level access to Linux systems equipped with GPUs based on Nvidia's Ampere and Ada Lovelace architectures. The vulnerability appears significantly more severe than what was outlined in a paper last year. Read Entire Article
[D] ICML Reviewer Acknowledgement
Hi, I'm a little confused about ICML discussion period Does the period for reviewer acknowledging responses have already ended? One of the four reviewers did not present any answer to a paper of mine. Do you know if the reviewer can still change their score before April 7th? There is a reviewer comment that I will answer on Monday. Will the reviewer be able to update the score after seeing my answer? Thanks! submitted by /u/Massive_Horror9038 [link] [comments]
Considerations for growing the pie
Recently some friends and I were comparing growing the pie interventions to an increasing our friends' share of the pie intervention, and at first we mostly missed some general considerations against the latter type. 1. Decision-theoretic considerations The world is full of people with different values working towards their own ends; each of them can choose to use their resources to increase the total size of the pie or to increase their share of the pie. All of them would significantly prefer a world in which resources were used to increase the size of the pie, and this leads to a number [of] compelling justifications for each individual to cooperate. . . . by increasing the size of the pie we create a world which is better for people on average, and from behind the veil of ignorance we s
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!