Improving Automated Wound Assessment Using Joint Boundary Segmentation and Multi-Class Classification Models
arXiv:2603.27325v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Accurate wound classification and boundary segmentation are essential for guiding clinical decisions in both chronic and acute wound management. However, most existing AI models are limited, focusing on a narrow set of wound types or performing only a single task (segmentation or classification), which reduces their clinical applicability. This study presents a deep learning model based on YOLOv11 that simultaneously performs wound boundary segmentation (WBS) and wound classification (WC) across five clinically relevant wound types: burn injury — Mehedi Hasan Tusar, Fateme Fayyazbakhsh, Igor Melnychuk, Ming C. Leu
View PDF
Abstract:Accurate wound classification and boundary segmentation are essential for guiding clinical decisions in both chronic and acute wound management. However, most existing AI models are limited, focusing on a narrow set of wound types or performing only a single task (segmentation or classification), which reduces their clinical applicability. This study presents a deep learning model based on YOLOv11 that simultaneously performs wound boundary segmentation (WBS) and wound classification (WC) across five clinically relevant wound types: burn injury (BI), pressure injury (PI), diabetic foot ulcer (DFU), vascular ulcer (VU), and surgical wound (SW). A wound-type balanced dataset of 2,963 annotated images was created to train the models for both tasks, with stratified five-fold cross-validation ensuring robust and unbiased evaluation. The models trained on the original non-augmented dataset achieved consistent performance across folds, though BI detection accuracy was relatively lower. Therefore, the dataset was augmented using rotation, flipping, and variations in brightness, saturation, and exposure to help the model learn more generalized and invariant features. This augmentation significantly improved model performance, particularly in detecting visually subtle BI cases. Among tested variants, YOLOv11x achieved the highest performance with F1-scores of 0.9341 (WBS) and 0.8736 (WC), while the lightweight YOLOv11n provided comparable accuracy at lower computational cost, making it suitable for resource-constrained deployments. Supported by confusion matrices and visual detection outputs, the results confirm the model's robustness against complex backgrounds and high intra-class variability, demonstrating the potential of YOLOv11-based architectures for accurate, real-time wound analysis in both clinical and remote care settings.
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.27325 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2603.27325v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.27325
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Mehedi Tusar [view email] [v1] Sat, 28 Mar 2026 16:11:31 UTC (1,688 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxivExclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models - WSJ
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiuANBVV95cUxOOGItWGdQMGlaeThwcnNieE40a05Ed19xRnlsYm9XdXdhTk9yc2NvWDU3Y3EwTDZNb2kzQ1Z1T0RIcEZlZDBNRTNTUG1LQ0I4cVZEQUZEcXhqREk5RllkS3EzTU10eHNrcWFDQ0lEdmYxaTBNMi1iMWMxS0t3bHpOSWt2bXhQcGxMOFFEWVNhN29HNVpmVkIwVXc2UmEtOFBpMnJvMi1rRkVxcWt2LWVvdnItNkllR1gyano3VEpPQVZNdTZWRkFvcWdWRm5QSmtTYmE2ajhnQ0picndQNE0xd21fdG1RWFpjcFFiRHh2OVRYMTVBclg2RTJvM1ZxZ0lmOWJrQV91S05kbjhXM3B6Z3BMeGJiY2tzMVNpNzZaNW91QjM4VFJIazVFOFRGSDJBdWg4ZXY3VUVvQnhkc3BIWjU2d0M3Uk1PdXZjOFR0QnplZmJQQkl6QVhNaEgzUG53RWwxdmRFNng5Q3pqc0hBaHNrTFVobk1iVV9PNnh2NEpGVEZ0TGZrUWNEZjlWMDNjWVZyV0UzZndPZ2I1dUtZWDN5TFJMUklkc1hoNWYwMEpRMkZJbEwxcQ?oc=5" target="_blank">Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">WSJ</font>
Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models - wsj.com
<a href="https://news.google.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?oc=5" target="_blank">Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">wsj.com</font>
AI Inspires New Research Topics In Materials Science - miragenews.com
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMihwFBVV95cUxQRlVFdkRBaHRvYkJJdFRlMTZmajEzeFRPU0hGWWdfbi02V1FnTUdVQ2pmY2VZLUV2NlB4V3BFdEVlSVZkUlhRSTZaNWFKMmcyWXJYbnNqbUhMTmp0NnFtMEppOXlPZkJSNHJfck5VSEVYcmUtX1k2QkJlR1BvUEdTTkp3UmlYRkk?oc=5" target="_blank">AI Inspires New Research Topics In Materials Science</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">miragenews.com</font>
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
AI Inspires New Research Topics In Materials Science - miragenews.com
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMihwFBVV95cUxQRlVFdkRBaHRvYkJJdFRlMTZmajEzeFRPU0hGWWdfbi02V1FnTUdVQ2pmY2VZLUV2NlB4V3BFdEVlSVZkUlhRSTZaNWFKMmcyWXJYbnNqbUhMTmp0NnFtMEppOXlPZkJSNHJfck5VSEVYcmUtX1k2QkJlR1BvUEdTTkp3UmlYRkk?oc=5" target="_blank">AI Inspires New Research Topics In Materials Science</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">miragenews.com</font>
From brain scans to alloys: Teaching AI to make sense of complex research data - Penn State University
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiwAFBVV95cUxPZDFHdkptQ2VUM2hmWjhqQkxoRnBiTWoxMXRRR21MUG5TamdUMlFRWmhvYVNHaFVNREVKU3VmSnVOdDVZYnNLb2ppYXRVRTZmVFVMV1pLTlVhUm9ybTNZbGtvZTdIMnIyMHNpOEk5aU9TSmxxS2Y4V2MwazYwY3JlX1Axbk1nd3pfcWhFdUJaaDJWRXJaMFIyTTROcmFHeXI3ZzFudXJ2M1h6UHI1LW1Ca1dta2RkM3BiYndocGk3Yjg?oc=5" target="_blank">From brain scans to alloys: Teaching AI to make sense of complex research data</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Penn State University</font>

Locating Risk: Task Designers and the Challenge of Risk Disclosure in RAI Content Work
arXiv:2505.24246v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As AI systems are increasingly tested and deployed in open-ended and high-stakes domains, crowdworkers are often tasked with responsible AI (RAI) content work. These tasks include labeling violent content, moderating disturbing text, or simulating harmful behavior for red teaming exercises to shape AI system behaviors. While prior research efforts have highlighted the risks to worker well-being associated with RAI content work, far less attention has been paid to how these risks are communicated to workers by task designers or individuals who design and post RAI tasks. Existing transparency frameworks and guidelines, such as model cards, datasheets, and crowdworksheets, focus on documenting model information and dataset collection process

Togedule: Scheduling Meetings with Large Language Models and Adaptive Representations of Group Availability
arXiv:2505.01000v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Scheduling is a perennial-and often challenging-problem for many groups. Existing tools are mostly static, showing an identical set of choices to everyone, regardless of the current status of attendees' inputs and preferences. In this paper, we propose Togedule, an adaptive scheduling tool that uses large language models to dynamically adjust the pool of choices and their presentation format. With the initial prototype, we conducted a formative study (N=10) and identified the potential benefits and risks of such an adaptive scheduling tool. Then, after enhancing the system, we conducted two controlled experiments, one each for attendees and organizers (total N=66). For each experiment, we compared scheduling with verbal messages, shared c

Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!