Multi-Level Barriers to Generative AI Adoption Across Disciplines and Professional Roles in Higher Education
arXiv:2603.27052v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly reshaping higher education, yet barriers to its adoption across different disciplines and institutional roles remain underexplored. Existing literature frequently attributes adoption barriers to individual-level factors such as perceived usefulness and ease of use. This study instead investigates whether such barriers are structurally produced. Drawing on a multi-method survey analysis of 272 academic and professional services (PSs) staff at a Russell Group university, we examine how discipl — Jianhua Yang, Kerem \"Oge, Adrian von M\"uhlenen, Abdullah Bilal Akbulut, Tanya Suzanne Carey, Chidi Okorro
View PDF
Abstract:Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly reshaping higher education, yet barriers to its adoption across different disciplines and institutional roles remain underexplored. Existing literature frequently attributes adoption barriers to individual-level factors such as perceived usefulness and ease of use. This study instead investigates whether such barriers are structurally produced. Drawing on a multi-method survey analysis of 272 academic and professional services (PSs) staff at a Russell Group university, we examine how disciplinary contexts and institutional roles shape perceived barriers. By integrating multinomial logistic regression (MLR), structural equation modelling (SEM), and semantic clustering of open-ended responses, we move beyond descriptive accounts to provide a multi-level explanation of GenAI adoption. Our findings reveal clear, systematic differences: non-STEM academics primarily report ethical and cultural barriers related to academic integrity, whereas STEM and PSs staff disproportionately emphasize institutional, governance, and infrastructure constraints. We conclude that GenAI adoption barriers are deeply embedded in organizational ecosystems and epistemic norms, suggesting that universities must move beyond generalized training to develop role-specific governance and support frameworks.
Comments: 21 pages, 3 figures, 6 tables
Subjects:
Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.27052 [cs.CY]
(or arXiv:2603.27052v1 [cs.CY] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.27052
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Jianhua Yang [view email] [v1] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 23:48:25 UTC (418 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
AI Regulation Insights
As Canada s trusted partner in AI advancement, Vector Institute continues to bridge cutting-edge research with practical industry applications through strategic initiatives. In response to the rapidly evolving AI regulatory landscape, [ ] The post AI Regulation Insights appeared first on Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence .
Thought Cloning: Teaching AI to Think Like Humans for Better Decision-Making
New research from Vector Faculty Member Jeff Clune and Vector Graduate Student Shengran Hu introduces a groundbreaking approach to imitation learning that could potentially revolutionize how we train AI agents. [ ] The post Thought Cloning: Teaching AI to Think Like Humans for Better Decision-Making appeared first on Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence .
Recommender Systems: Where Academia Meets Industry
Authors: Shaina Raza, Amirmohammad Kazemeini This blog is based on the survey paper “A Comprehensive Review of Recommender Systems.” Recommender Systems (RS) blend artificial intelligence (AI) and personalization in a [ ] The post Recommender Systems: Where Academia Meets Industry appeared first on Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence .
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
Quantum computers might crack today's encryption far sooner than we thought
According to a study by engineers at Caltech and the UC Department of Physics, quantum computers do not need to be nearly as powerful as previously believed to crack the most advanced cryptographic technologies. The research claims that Shor's algorithm could break RSA public-key encryption using quantum computers with just... Read Entire Article
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!