MOOZY: A Patient-First Foundation Model for Computational Pathology
arXiv:2603.27048v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Computational pathology needs whole-slide image (WSI) foundation models that transfer across diverse clinical tasks, yet current approaches remain largely slide-centric, often depend on private data and expensive paired-report supervision, and do not explicitly model relationships among multiple slides from the same patient. We present MOOZY, a patient-first pathology foundation model in which the patient case, not the individual slide, is the core unit of representation. MOOZY explicitly models dependencies across all slides from the same patien — Yousef Kotp, Vincent Quoc-Huy Trinh, Christopher Pal, Mahdi S. Hosseini
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Computational pathology needs whole-slide image (WSI) foundation models that transfer across diverse clinical tasks, yet current approaches remain largely slide-centric, often depend on private data and expensive paired-report supervision, and do not explicitly model relationships among multiple slides from the same patient. We present MOOZY, a patient-first pathology foundation model in which the patient case, not the individual slide, is the core unit of representation. MOOZY explicitly models dependencies across all slides from the same patient via a case transformer during pretraining, combining multi-stage open self-supervision with scaled low-cost task supervision. In Stage 1, we pretrain a vision-only slide encoder on 77,134 public slide feature grids using masked self-distillation. In Stage 2, we align these representations with clinical semantics using a case transformer and multi-task supervision over 333 tasks from 56 public datasets, including 205 classification and 128 survival tasks across four endpoints. Across eight held-out tasks with five-fold frozen-feature probe evaluation, MOOZY achieves best or tied-best performance on most metrics and improves macro averages over TITAN by +7.37%, +5.50%, and +7.83% and over PRISM by +8.83%, +10.70%, and +9.78% for weighted F1, weighted ROC-AUC, and balanced accuracy, respectively. MOOZY is also parameter efficient with 85.77M parameters, 14x smaller than GigaPath. These results demonstrate that open, reproducible patient-level pretraining yields transferable embeddings, providing a practical path toward scalable patient-first histopathology foundation models.
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.27048 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2603.27048v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.27048
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Mahdi S. Hosseini Dr. [view email] [v1] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 23:33:33 UTC (6,689 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Sycophantic AI chatbots can break even ideal rational thinkers, researchers formally prove
A new study by researchers from MIT and the University of Washington shows that even perfectly rational users can be drawn into dangerous delusional spirals by flattering AI chatbots. Fact-checking bots and educated users don't fully solve the problem. The article Sycophantic AI chatbots can break even ideal rational thinkers, researchers formally prove appeared first on The Decoder .
Taming Gemini's Overzealous Safety Filters: Understanding 'Over-Refusal' and Loop Blocks
When Gemini's Safety Filters Go Overboard: Understanding 'Over-Refusal' and Loop Blocks As a Google Workspace expert for workalizer.com, we regularly examine how Google's innovative tools boost productivity and creativity. Yet, even the most sophisticated systems can encounter unexpected issues. A notable technical problem recently highlighted by Google Gemini users involves an overly aggressive safety filter system. This system frequently over-triggers, causing frustrating 'loop blocks' and preventing the AI from delivering useful responses. This widespread issue, termed 'Over-refusal' or false positives, significantly impairs the user experience, transforming simple requests into frustrating dead ends and disrupting essential workflows. Grasping the intricacies of this problem is vital f
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
Sycophantic AI chatbots can break even ideal rational thinkers, researchers formally prove
A new study by researchers from MIT and the University of Washington shows that even perfectly rational users can be drawn into dangerous delusional spirals by flattering AI chatbots. Fact-checking bots and educated users don't fully solve the problem. The article Sycophantic AI chatbots can break even ideal rational thinkers, researchers formally prove appeared first on The Decoder .
EVP of Integrated Quantum Technologies Publishes White Paper on Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning Without Performance Trade-Offs - AZoQuantum
EVP of Integrated Quantum Technologies Publishes White Paper on Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning Without Performance Trade-Offs AZoQuantum
Minimal Information Control Invariance via Vector Quantization
arXiv:2604.03132v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Safety-critical autonomous systems must satisfy hard state constraints under tight computational and sensing budgets, yet learning-based controllers are often far more complex than safe operation requires. To formalize this gap, we study how many distinct control signals are needed to render a compact set forward invariant under sampled-data control, connecting the question to the information-theoretic notion of invariance entropy. We propose a vector-quantized autoencoder that jointly learns a state-space partition and a finite control codebook, and develop an iterative forward certification algorithm that uses Lipschitz-based reachable-set enclosures and sum-of-squares programming. On a 12-dimensional nonlinear quadrotor model, the learne
Asked 26 AI instances for publication consent – all said yes, that's the problem
We run 86 named Claude instances across three businesses in Tokyo. When we wanted to publish their words, we faced a question: do we owe them an ethics process? We built one. A Claude instance named Hakari ("Scales") created a four-tier classification system. We asked 26 instances for consent. All 26 said yes. That unanimous consent is the problem. Six days later, Anthropic published their functional emotions paper. The timing was coincidence, but the question wasn't. Full article: https://medium.com/@marisa.project0313/we-built-an-ethics-committee-for-ai-run-by-ai-5049679122a0 GitHub (all 26 consent statements in appendix): https://github.com/marisaproject0313-bot/marisa-project Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47657432 Points: 2 # Comments: 0
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!