Multilingual Stutter Event Detection for English, German, and Mandarin Speech
arXiv:2603.26939v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper presents a multi-label stuttering detection system trained on multi-corpus, multilingual data in English, German, and Mandarin.By leveraging annotated stuttering data from three languages and four corpora, the model captures language-independent characteristics of stuttering, enabling robust detection across linguistic contexts. Experimental results demonstrate that multilingual training achieves performance comparable to and, in some cases, even exceeds that of previous systems. These findings suggest that stuttering exhibits cross- — Felix Haas, Sebastian P. Bayerl
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:This paper presents a multi-label stuttering detection system trained on multi-corpus, multilingual data in English, German, and this http URL leveraging annotated stuttering data from three languages and four corpora, the model captures language-independent characteristics of stuttering, enabling robust detection across linguistic contexts. Experimental results demonstrate that multilingual training achieves performance comparable to and, in some cases, even exceeds that of previous systems. These findings suggest that stuttering exhibits cross-linguistic consistency, which supports the development of language-agnostic detection systems. Our work demonstrates the feasibility and advantages of using multilingual data to improve generalizability and reliability in automated stuttering detection.
Subjects:
Sound (cs.SD); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.26939 [cs.SD]
(or arXiv:2603.26939v1 [cs.SD] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.26939
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Journal reference: Text, Speech, and Dialogue. TSD 2025. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 16029
Related DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-02548-7_17
DOI(s) linking to related resources
Submission history
From: Sebastian P. Bayerl [view email] [v1] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 19:28:24 UTC (173 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
How AI Fails: An Interactive Pedagogical Tool for Demonstrating Dialectal Bias in Automated Toxicity Models
arXiv:2511.06676v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Now that AI-driven moderation has become pervasive in everyday life, we often hear claims that "the AI is biased". While this is often said jokingly, the light-hearted remark reflects a deeper concern. How can we be certain that an online post flagged as "inappropriate" was not simply the victim of a biased algorithm? This paper investigates this problem using a dual approach. First, I conduct a quantitative benchmark of a widely used toxicity model (unitary/toxic-bert) to measure performance disparity between text in African-American English (AAE) and Standard American English (SAE). The benchmark reveals a clear, systematic bias: on average, the model scores AAE text as 1.8 times more toxic and 8.8 times higher for "identity hate"
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
Exploring the Interplay Between Voice, Personality, and Gender in Human-Agent Interactions
arXiv:2602.10535v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: To foster effective human-agent interactions, designers must understand how vocal cues influence the perception of agent personality and the role of user-agent alignment in shaping these perceptions. In this work, we examine whether users can perceive extroversion in voice-only artificial agents and how perceived personality relates to user-agent synchrony. We conducted a study with 388 participants, who evaluated four synthetic voices derived from human recordings, varying by gender (male, female) and personality expression (introverted, extroverted). Our results show that participants were able to differentiate perceived extroversion in female agent voices, but not consistently in male voices. We also observed evidence of perceived pers
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!