Strategic Candidacy in Generative AI Arenas
arXiv:2603.26891v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI arenas, which rank generative models from pairwise preferences of users, are a popular method for measuring the relative performance of models in the course of their organic use. Because rankings are computed from noisy preferences, there is a concern that model producers can exploit this randomness by submitting many models (e.g., multiple variants of essentially the same model) and thereby artificially improve the rank of their top models. This can lead to degradations in the quality, and therefore the usefulness, of the ranking. In this p — Chris Hays, Rachel Li, Bailey Flanigan, Manish Raghavan
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:AI arenas, which rank generative models from pairwise preferences of users, are a popular method for measuring the relative performance of models in the course of their organic use. Because rankings are computed from noisy preferences, there is a concern that model producers can exploit this randomness by submitting many models (e.g., multiple variants of essentially the same model) and thereby artificially improve the rank of their top models. This can lead to degradations in the quality, and therefore the usefulness, of the ranking. In this paper, we begin by establishing, both theoretically and in simulations calibrated to data from the platform Arena (formerly LMArena, Chatbot Arena), conditions under which producers can benefit from submitting clones when their goal is to be ranked highly. We then propose a new mechanism for ranking models from pairwise comparisons, called You-Rank-We-Rank (YRWR). It requires that producers submit rankings over their own models and uses these rankings to correct statistical estimates of model quality. We prove that this mechanism is approximately clone-robust, in the sense that a producer cannot improve their rank much by doing anything other than submitting each of their unique models exactly once. Moreover, to the extent that model producers are able to correctly rank their own models, YRWR improves overall ranking accuracy. In further simulations, we show that indeed the mechanism is approximately clone-robust and quantify improvements to ranking accuracy, even under producer misranking.
Comments: 43 pages, 5 figures
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.26891 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2603.26891v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.26891
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Chris Hays [view email] [v1] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 18:12:58 UTC (1,723 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
AI can clone open-source software in minutes, and that's a problem
Two software researchers recently demonstrated how modern AI tools can reproduce entire open-source projects, creating proprietary versions that appear both functional and legally distinct. The partly-satirical demonstration shows how quickly artificial intelligence can blur long-standing boundaries between coding innovation, copyright law, and the open-source principles that underpin much of the... Read Entire Article
Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models - WSJ
<a href="https://news.google.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?oc=5" target="_blank">Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">WSJ</font>
Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models - WSJ
<a href="https://news.google.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?oc=5" target="_blank">Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">WSJ</font>
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
AI Inspires New Research Topics In Materials Science - miragenews.com
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMihwFBVV95cUxQRlVFdkRBaHRvYkJJdFRlMTZmajEzeFRPU0hGWWdfbi02V1FnTUdVQ2pmY2VZLUV2NlB4V3BFdEVlSVZkUlhRSTZaNWFKMmcyWXJYbnNqbUhMTmp0NnFtMEppOXlPZkJSNHJfck5VSEVYcmUtX1k2QkJlR1BvUEdTTkp3UmlYRkk?oc=5" target="_blank">AI Inspires New Research Topics In Materials Science</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">miragenews.com</font>
From brain scans to alloys: Teaching AI to make sense of complex research data - Penn State University
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiwAFBVV95cUxPZDFHdkptQ2VUM2hmWjhqQkxoRnBiTWoxMXRRR21MUG5TamdUMlFRWmhvYVNHaFVNREVKU3VmSnVOdDVZYnNLb2ppYXRVRTZmVFVMV1pLTlVhUm9ybTNZbGtvZTdIMnIyMHNpOEk5aU9TSmxxS2Y4V2MwazYwY3JlX1Axbk1nd3pfcWhFdUJaaDJWRXJaMFIyTTROcmFHeXI3ZzFudXJ2M1h6UHI1LW1Ca1dta2RkM3BiYndocGk3Yjg?oc=5" target="_blank">From brain scans to alloys: Teaching AI to make sense of complex research data</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Penn State University</font>
Locating Risk: Task Designers and the Challenge of Risk Disclosure in RAI Content Work
arXiv:2505.24246v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As AI systems are increasingly tested and deployed in open-ended and high-stakes domains, crowdworkers are often tasked with responsible AI (RAI) content work. These tasks include labeling violent content, moderating disturbing text, or simulating harmful behavior for red teaming exercises to shape AI system behaviors. While prior research efforts have highlighted the risks to worker well-being associated with RAI content work, far less attention has been paid to how these risks are communicated to workers by task designers or individuals who design and post RAI tasks. Existing transparency frameworks and guidelines, such as model cards, datasheets, and crowdworksheets, focus on documenting model information and dataset collection process
Togedule: Scheduling Meetings with Large Language Models and Adaptive Representations of Group Availability
arXiv:2505.01000v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Scheduling is a perennial-and often challenging-problem for many groups. Existing tools are mostly static, showing an identical set of choices to everyone, regardless of the current status of attendees' inputs and preferences. In this paper, we propose Togedule, an adaptive scheduling tool that uses large language models to dynamically adjust the pool of choices and their presentation format. With the initial prototype, we conducted a formative study (N=10) and identified the potential benefits and risks of such an adaptive scheduling tool. Then, after enhancing the system, we conducted two controlled experiments, one each for attendees and organizers (total N=66). For each experiment, we compared scheduling with verbal messages, shared c
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!