Dual-branch Graph Domain Adaptation for Cross-scenario Multi-modal Emotion Recognition
arXiv:2603.26840v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal Emotion Recognition in Conversations (MERC) aims to predict speakers' emotional states in multi-turn dialogues through text, audio, and visual cues. In real-world settings, conversation scenarios differ significantly in speakers, topics, styles, and noise levels. Existing MERC methods generally neglect these cross-scenario variations, limiting their ability to transfer models trained on a source domain to unseen target domains. To address this issue, we propose a Dual-branch Graph Domain Adaptation framework (DGDA) for multimodal emo — Yuntao Shou, Jun Zhou, Tao Meng, Wei Ai, Keqin Li
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Multimodal Emotion Recognition in Conversations (MERC) aims to predict speakers' emotional states in multi-turn dialogues through text, audio, and visual cues. In real-world settings, conversation scenarios differ significantly in speakers, topics, styles, and noise levels. Existing MERC methods generally neglect these cross-scenario variations, limiting their ability to transfer models trained on a source domain to unseen target domains. To address this issue, we propose a Dual-branch Graph Domain Adaptation framework (DGDA) for multimodal emotion recognition under cross-scenario conditions. We first construct an emotion interaction graph to characterize complex emotional dependencies among utterances. A dual-branch encoder, consisting of a hypergraph neural network (HGNN) and a path neural network (PathNN), is then designed to explicitly model multivariate relationships and implicitly capture global dependencies. To enable out-of-domain generalization, a domain adversarial discriminator is introduced to learn invariant representations across domains. Furthermore, a regularization loss is incorporated to suppress the negative influence of noisy labels. To the best of our knowledge, DGDA is the first MERC framework that jointly addresses domain shift and label noise. Theoretical analysis provides tighter generalization bounds, and extensive experiments on IEMOCAP and MELD demonstrate that DGDA consistently outperforms strong baselines and better adapts to cross-scenario conversations. Our code is available at this https URL.
Comments: 29 pages
Subjects:
Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.26840 [eess.AS]
(or arXiv:2603.26840v1 [eess.AS] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.26840
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Yuntao Shou [view email] [v1] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 08:21:09 UTC (9,223 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
How to Build an AI Content Playbook That Actually Protects Your Voice
Ahnii! You've read the articles warning you not to let AI take over your content. Ruth Doherty's latest piece is one of the best: a clear-eyed breakdown of where AI helps and where it silently destroys your brand. This post shows you how to take that framework and turn it into an actual operating document for your content pipeline. Why a Framework Without a Playbook Doesn't Stick Ruth's core argument is sharp: AI is an efficiency engine, not a strategy engine. Use it for research, structuring, repurposing, and editing. Keep it away from messaging, customer research, and anything that requires your actual point of view. That distinction is easy to agree with. It's harder to enforce on a Tuesday afternoon when you're behind on three social posts and the AI can draft all of them in 90 seconds
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!