Robot Arm Control via Cognitive Map Learners
arXiv:2603.26773v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Cognitive map learners (CML) have been shown to enable hierarchical, compositional machine learning. That is, interpedently trained CML modules can be arbitrarily composed together to solve more complex problems without task-specific retraining. This work applies this approach to control the movement of a multi-jointed robot arm, whereby each arm segment's angular position is governed by an independently trained CML. Operating in a 2D Cartesian plane, target points are encoded as phasor hypervectors according to fractional power encoding (FPE). — Nathan McDonald, Colyn Seeley, Christian Brazeau
View PDF
Abstract:Cognitive map learners (CML) have been shown to enable hierarchical, compositional machine learning. That is, interpedently trained CML modules can be arbitrarily composed together to solve more complex problems without task-specific retraining. This work applies this approach to control the movement of a multi-jointed robot arm, whereby each arm segment's angular position is governed by an independently trained CML. Operating in a 2D Cartesian plane, target points are encoded as phasor hypervectors according to fractional power encoding (FPE). This phasor hypervector is then factorized into a set of arm segment angles either via a resonator network or a modern Hopfield network. These arm segment angles are subsequently fed to their respective arm segment CMLs, which reposition the robot arm to the target point without the use of inverse kinematic equations. This work presents both a general solution for both a 2D robot arm with an arbitrary number of arm segments and a particular solution for a 3D arm with a single rotating base.
Subjects:
Robotics (cs.RO); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.26773 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2603.26773v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.26773
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Nathan McDonald [view email] [v1] Tue, 24 Mar 2026 16:39:07 UTC (2,931 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
How to Build an AI Content Playbook That Actually Protects Your Voice
Ahnii! You've read the articles warning you not to let AI take over your content. Ruth Doherty's latest piece is one of the best: a clear-eyed breakdown of where AI helps and where it silently destroys your brand. This post shows you how to take that framework and turn it into an actual operating document for your content pipeline. Why a Framework Without a Playbook Doesn't Stick Ruth's core argument is sharp: AI is an efficiency engine, not a strategy engine. Use it for research, structuring, repurposing, and editing. Keep it away from messaging, customer research, and anything that requires your actual point of view. That distinction is easy to agree with. It's harder to enforce on a Tuesday afternoon when you're behind on three social posts and the AI can draft all of them in 90 seconds
Top 10 Best Universities to Study AI in USA 2026 Led by CMU and MIT With Strong Research and Industry Ties - International Business Times Australia
Top 10 Best Universities to Study AI in USA 2026 Led by CMU and MIT With Strong Research and Industry Ties International Business Times Australia
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!