On the Carbon Footprint of Economic Research in the Age of Generative AI

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to write and refactor research code, expanding computational workflows. At the same time, Green AI research has largely measured the footprint of models rather than the downstream workflows in which GenAI is a tool. We shift the unit of analysis from models to workflows and treat prompts as decision policies that allocate discretion between researcher and system, governing what is executed and when iteration stops. We contribute in two ways. First, we map the recent Green AI literature into seven themes: training footprint is the largest cluster, while inference efficiency and system level optimisation are growing rapidly, alongside measurement protocols, green algorithms, governance, and security and efficiency trade-offs. Second, we benchmark a modern economic survey workflow, an LDA-based literature mapping implemented with GenAI assisted coding and executed in a fixed cloud notebook, measuring runtime and estimated CO2e with CodeCarbon. Injecting generic green language into prompts has no reliable effect, whereas operational constraints and decision rule prompts deliver large and stable footprint reductions while preserving decision equivalent topic outputs. The results identify human in the loop governance as a practical lever to align GenAI productivity with environmental efficiency.

Subjects:

Software Engineering (cs.SE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY); General Economics (econ.GN)

Cite as: arXiv:2603.26712 [cs.SE]

(or arXiv:2603.26712v1 [cs.SE] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.26712

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Andres Alonso-Robisco [view email] [v1] Tue, 17 Mar 2026 22:18:32 UTC (2,310 KB)