Shapley meets Rawls: an integrated framework for measuring and explaining unfairness

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Explainability and fairness have mainly been considered separately, with recent exceptions trying the explain the sources of unfairness. This paper shows that the Shapley value can be used to both define and explain unfairness, under standard group fairness criteria. This offers an integrated framework to estimate and derive inference on unfairness as-well-as the features that contribute to it. Our framework can also be extended from Shapley values to the family of Efficient-Symmetric-Linear (ESL) values, some of which offer more robust definitions of fairness, and shorter computation times. An illustration is run on the Census Income dataset from the UCI Machine Learning Repository. Our approach shows that Age", Number of hours" and ``Marital status" generate gender unfairness, using shorter computation time than traditional Bootstrap tests.

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2603.26476 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2603.26476v2 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.26476

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Stéphane Mussard [view email] [v1] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 14:41:57 UTC (83 KB) [v2] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 06:40:57 UTC (83 KB)