Analysing Calls to Order in German Parliamentary Debates
arXiv:2603.26430v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Parliamentary debate constitutes a central arena of political power, shaping legislative outcomes and public discourse. Incivility within this arena signals political polarization and institutional conflict. This study presents a systematic investigation of incivility in the German Bundestag by examining calls to order (CtO; plural: CtOs) as formal indicators of norm violations. Despite their relevance, CtOs have received little systematic attention in parliamentary research. We introduce a rule-based method for detecting and annotating CtOs in p — Nina Smirnova, Daniel Dan, Philipp Mayr
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Parliamentary debate constitutes a central arena of political power, shaping legislative outcomes and public discourse. Incivility within this arena signals political polarization and institutional conflict. This study presents a systematic investigation of incivility in the German Bundestag by examining calls to order (CtO; plural: CtOs) as formal indicators of norm violations. Despite their relevance, CtOs have received little systematic attention in parliamentary research. We introduce a rule-based method for detecting and annotating CtOs in parliamentary speeches and present a novel dataset of German parliamentary debates spanning 72 years that includes annotated CtO instances. Additionally, we develop the first classification system for CtO triggers and analyze the factors associated with their occurrence. Our findings show that, despite formal regulations, the issuance of CtOs is partly subjective and influenced by session presidents and parliamentary dynamics, with certain individuals disproportionately affected. An insult towards individuals is the most frequent cause of CtO. In general, male members and those belonging to opposition parties receive more calls to order than their female and coalition-party counterparts. Most CtO triggers were detected in speeches dedicated to governmental affairs and actions of the presidency. The CtO triggers dataset is available at: this https URL.
Comments: The paper is accepted to the 3rd Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Political Sciences (PoliticalNLP 2026) co-located with LREC 2026
Subjects:
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.26430 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2603.26430v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.26430
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Nina Smirnova [view email] [v1] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 14:00:47 UTC (363 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
I made Parseltongue - language to solve AI hallucinations
Yes, that one from HPMoR by @Eliezer Yudkowsky . And I mean it absolutely literally - this is a language designed to make lies inexpressible. It catches LLMs' ungrounded statements, incoherent logic and hallucinations. Comes with notebooks (Jupyter-style), server for use with agents, and inspection tooling. Github , Documentation . Works everywhere - even in the web Claude with the code execution sandbox. How Unsophisticated lies and manipulations are typically ungrounded or include logical inconsistencies. Coherent, factually grounded deception is a problem whose complexity grows exponentially - and our AI is far from solving such tasks. There will still be a theoretical possibility to do it - especially under incomplete information - and we have a guarantee that there is no full computat
![[D] The memory chip market lost tens of billions over a paper this community would have understood in 10 minutes](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-quantum-N2hdoEfCm2gAozJVRfL5wL.webp)
[D] The memory chip market lost tens of billions over a paper this community would have understood in 10 minutes
TurboQuant was teased recently and tens of billions gone from memory chip market in 48 hours but anyone in this community who read the paper would have seen the problem with the panic immediately. TurboQuant compresses the KV cache down to 3 bits per value from the standard 16 using polar coordinate quantization. But the KV cache is inference memory. Training memory, activations, gradients, optimizer states, is a completely different thing and completely untouched. And majority of HBM demand comes from training. An inference compression paper doesn't move that number. And the commercial inference baseline already runs at 4 to 8 bit precision. The 6x headline is benchmarked against 16 bit full precision. The real marginal gain over what's actually deployed is considerably smaller than that
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
![[D] Is research in semantic segmentation saturated?](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-microchip-RD7Ub6Tkp8JwbZxSThJdV5.webp)
[D] Is research in semantic segmentation saturated?
Nowadays I dont see a lot of papers addressing 2D semantic segmentation problem statements be it supervised, semi-supervised, domain adaptation. Is the problem statement saturated? Are there any promising research directions in segmentation except open-set segmentation? submitted by /u/Hot_Version_6403 [link] [comments]
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!