STN-GPR: A Singularity Tensor Network Framework for Efficient Option Pricing
arXiv:2603.26318v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We develop a tensor-network surrogate for option pricing, targeting large-scale portfolio revaluation problems arising in market risk management (e.g., VaR and Expected Shortfall computations). The method involves representing high-dimensional price surfaces in tensor-train (TT) form using TT-cross approximation, constructing the surrogate directly from black-box price evaluations without materializing the full training tensor. For inference, we use a Laplacian kernel and derive TT representations of the kernel matrix and its closed-form invers — Dominic Gribben, Carolina Allende, Alba Villarino, Aser Cortines, Mazen Ali, Rom\'an Or\'us, Pascal Oswald, Noureddine Lehdili
View PDF
Abstract:We develop a tensor-network surrogate for option pricing, targeting large-scale portfolio revaluation problems arising in market risk management (e.g., VaR and Expected Shortfall computations). The method involves representing high-dimensional price surfaces in tensor-train (TT) form using TT-cross approximation, constructing the surrogate directly from black-box price evaluations without materializing the full training tensor. For inference, we use a Laplacian kernel and derive TT representations of the kernel matrix and its closed-form inverse in the noise-free setting, enabling TT-based Gaussian process regression without dense matrix factorization or iterative linear solves. We found that hyperparameter optimization consistently favors a large kernel length-scale and show that in this regime the GPR predictor reduces to multilinear interpolation for off-grid inputs; we also derive a low-rank TT representation for this limit. We evaluate the approach on five-asset basket options over an eight dimensional parameter space (asset spot levels, strike, interest rate, and time to maturity). For European geometric basket puts, the tensor surrogate achieves lower test error at shorter training times than standard GPR by scaling to substantially larger effective training sets. For American arithmetic basket puts trained on LSMC data, the surrogate exhibits more favorable scaling with training-set size while providing millisecond-level evaluation per query, with overall runtime dominated by data generation.
Comments: 15 pages, 2 figures
Subjects:
Pricing of Securities (q-fin.PR); Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.26318 [q-fin.PR]
(or arXiv:2603.26318v1 [q-fin.PR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.26318
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Dominic Gribben [view email] [v1] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 11:35:03 UTC (758 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
New Rowhammer attack can grant kernel-level control on Nvidia workstation GPUs
A study from researchers at UNC Chapel Hill and Georgia Tech shows that GDDR6-based Rowhammer attacks can grant kernel-level access to Linux systems equipped with GPUs based on Nvidia's Ampere and Ada Lovelace architectures. The vulnerability appears significantly more severe than what was outlined in a paper last year. Read Entire Article
![[D] ICML Reviewer Acknowledgement](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-matrix-rain-CvjLrWJiXfamUnvj5xT9J9.webp)
[D] ICML Reviewer Acknowledgement
Hi, I'm a little confused about ICML discussion period Does the period for reviewer acknowledging responses have already ended? One of the four reviewers did not present any answer to a paper of mine. Do you know if the reviewer can still change their score before April 7th? There is a reviewer comment that I will answer on Monday. Will the reviewer be able to update the score after seeing my answer? Thanks! submitted by /u/Massive_Horror9038 [link] [comments]
Considerations for growing the pie
Recently some friends and I were comparing growing the pie interventions to an increasing our friends' share of the pie intervention, and at first we mostly missed some general considerations against the latter type. 1. Decision-theoretic considerations The world is full of people with different values working towards their own ends; each of them can choose to use their resources to increase the total size of the pie or to increase their share of the pie. All of them would significantly prefer a world in which resources were used to increase the size of the pie, and this leads to a number [of] compelling justifications for each individual to cooperate. . . . by increasing the size of the pie we create a world which is better for people on average, and from behind the veil of ignorance we s
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
New Rowhammer attack can grant kernel-level control on Nvidia workstation GPUs
A study from researchers at UNC Chapel Hill and Georgia Tech shows that GDDR6-based Rowhammer attacks can grant kernel-level access to Linux systems equipped with GPUs based on Nvidia's Ampere and Ada Lovelace architectures. The vulnerability appears significantly more severe than what was outlined in a paper last year. Read Entire Article
[D] ICML Reviewer Acknowledgement
Hi, I'm a little confused about ICML discussion period Does the period for reviewer acknowledging responses have already ended? One of the four reviewers did not present any answer to a paper of mine. Do you know if the reviewer can still change their score before April 7th? There is a reviewer comment that I will answer on Monday. Will the reviewer be able to update the score after seeing my answer? Thanks! submitted by /u/Massive_Horror9038 [link] [comments]
Considerations for growing the pie
Recently some friends and I were comparing growing the pie interventions to an increasing our friends' share of the pie intervention, and at first we mostly missed some general considerations against the latter type. 1. Decision-theoretic considerations The world is full of people with different values working towards their own ends; each of them can choose to use their resources to increase the total size of the pie or to increase their share of the pie. All of them would significantly prefer a world in which resources were used to increase the size of the pie, and this leads to a number [of] compelling justifications for each individual to cooperate. . . . by increasing the size of the pie we create a world which is better for people on average, and from behind the veil of ignorance we s
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!