DUGAE: Unified Geometry and Attribute Enhancement via Spatiotemporal Correlations for G-PCC Compressed Dynamic Point Clouds
arXiv:2603.26183v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing post-decoding quality enhancement methods for point clouds are designed for static data and typically process each frame independently. As a result, they cannot effectively exploit the spatiotemporal correlations present in point cloud sequences.We propose a unified geometry and attribute enhancement framework (DUGAE) for G-PCC compressed dynamic point clouds that explicitly exploits inter-frame spatiotemporal correlations in both geometry and attributes. First, a dynamic geometry enhancement network (DGE-Net) based on sparse convolution — Pan Zhao, Hui Yuan, Chang Sun, Chongzhen Tian, Raouf Hamzaoui, Sam Kwong
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Existing post-decoding quality enhancement methods for point clouds are designed for static data and typically process each frame independently. As a result, they cannot effectively exploit the spatiotemporal correlations present in point cloud this http URL propose a unified geometry and attribute enhancement framework (DUGAE) for G-PCC compressed dynamic point clouds that explicitly exploits inter-frame spatiotemporal correlations in both geometry and attributes. First, a dynamic geometry enhancement network (DGE-Net) based on sparse convolution (SPConv) and feature-domain geometry motion compensation (GMC) aligns and aggregates spatiotemporal information. Then, a detail-aware k-nearest neighbors (DA-KNN) recoloring module maps the original attributes onto the enhanced geometry at the encoder side, improving mapping completeness and preserving attribute details. Finally, a dynamic attribute enhancement network (DAE-Net) with dedicated temporal feature extraction and feature-domain attribute motion compensation (AMC) refines attributes by modeling complex spatiotemporal correlations. On seven dynamic point clouds from the 8iVFB v2, Owlii, and MVUB datasets, DUGAE significantly enhanced the performance of the latest G-PCC geometry-based solid content test model (GeS-TM v10). For geometry (D1), it achieved an average BD-PSNR gain of 11.03 dB and a 93.95% BD-bitrate reduction. For the luma component, it achieved a 4.23 dB BD-PSNR gain with a 66.61% BD-bitrate reduction. DUGAE also improved perceptual quality (as measured by PCQM) and outperformed V-PCC. Our source code will be released on GitHub at: this https URL
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.26183 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2603.26183v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.26183
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Hui Yuan [view email] [v1] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 08:54:34 UTC (3,724 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Ask HN: Learning resources for building AI agents?
I’ve recently gone through several materials, including Antonio Gulli’s AI Agentic Design Patterns, Sam Bhagwat’s Principles of Building AI Agents and Patterns for Building AI Agents, as well as the courses from LangGraph Academy and some content on DataCamp. This space is evolving very quickly, so I’m curious how others here are approaching learning. What resources, courses, papers, or hands-on approaches have you found most useful while building AI agents? Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47637083 Points: 2 # Comments: 3
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
Multi-fidelity approaches for general constrained Bayesian optimization with application to aircraft design
Aircraft design relies heavily on solving challenging and computationally expensive Multidisciplinary Design Optimization problems. In this context, there has been growing interest in multi-fidelity models for Bayesian optimization to improve the MDO process by balancing computational cost and accuracy through the combination of high- and low-fidelity simulation models, enabling efficient exploration of the design process at a minimal computational effort. In the existing literature, fidelity selection focuses only on the objective function to decide how to integrate multiple fidelity levels, — Oihan Cordelier, Youssef Diouane, Nathalie Bartoli
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!