Pure and Physics-Guided Deep Learning Solutions for Spatio-Temporal Groundwater Level Prediction at Arbitrary Locations
arXiv:2603.25779v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Groundwater represents a key element of the water cycle, yet it exhibits intricate and context-dependent relationships that make its modeling a challenging task. Theory-based models have been the cornerstone of scientific understanding. However, their computational demands, simplifying assumptions, and calibration requirements limit their use. In recent years, data-driven models have emerged as powerful alternatives. In particular, deep learning has proven to be a leading approach for its design flexibility and ability to learn complex relation — Matteo Salis, Gabriele Sartor, Rosa Meo, Stefano Ferraris, Abdourrahmane M. Atto
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Groundwater represents a key element of the water cycle, yet it exhibits intricate and context-dependent relationships that make its modeling a challenging task. Theory-based models have been the cornerstone of scientific understanding. However, their computational demands, simplifying assumptions, and calibration requirements limit their use. In recent years, data-driven models have emerged as powerful alternatives. In particular, deep learning has proven to be a leading approach for its design flexibility and ability to learn complex relationships. We proposed an attention-based pure deep learning model, named STAINet, to predict weekly groundwater levels at an arbitrary and variable number of locations, leveraging both spatially sparse groundwater measurements and spatially dense weather information. Then, to enhance the model's trustworthiness and generalization ability, we considered different physics-guided strategies to inject the groundwater flow equation into the model. Firstly, in the STAINet-IB, by introducing an inductive bias, we also estimated the governing equation components. Then, by adopting a learning bias strategy, we proposed the STAINet-ILB, trained with additional loss terms adding supervision on the estimated equation components. Lastly, we developed the STAINet-ILRB, leveraging the groundwater body recharge zone information estimated by domain experts. The STAINet-ILB performed the best, achieving overwhelming test performances in a rollout setting (median MAPE 0.16%, KGE 0.58). Furthermore, it predicted sensible equation components, providing insights into the model's physical soundness. Physics-guided approaches represent a promising opportunity to enhance both the generalization ability and the trustworthiness, thereby paving the way to a new generation of disruptive hybrid deep learning Earth system models.
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.25779 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2603.25779v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.25779
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Matteo Salis [view email] [v1] Thu, 26 Mar 2026 15:57:08 UTC (71,687 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxivWhat Karpathy's Autoresearch Unlocked for Me
<p>I'm not a data scientist. I've trained a few models before — simple classification problems, with AI writing the Python and me running the iterations. It worked. I got confident.</p> <p>Then a friend asked for help with something harder.</p> <h2> Three Weeks at 0.58 </h2> <p>The problem involved predicting an outcome from a mix of CRM data and call recordings. Not trivial, but not exotic either.</p> <p>Quick primer on AUC — the metric I'll use throughout. Imagine your model looks at two random people: one where the answer is yes, one where it's no. AUC measures how often the model correctly ranks the yes above the no. Score of 0.5 means random guessing. Score of 1.0 means always right.</p> <p>I tried everything I knew: XGBoost, feature engineering, extracting features from transcripts u
Is AI's visual understanding mostly a 'mirage'? New research suggests so - inkl
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMimwFBVV95cUxNUjItTURkaldjcXhpNjA0b2dSVUhWNGRwaEkzclBMM0FFMk8wNTNsMWFDc1hmVU9jYU5jbzBKSG42WGZpbTI5TUs0R0w5Q2QxX0NCdjgtT2JtUUNsWHkxUFE1MzJjN1RxMmdmQjc5YlBsVTdfVU02Z1FZSlFrLU1hdmxibjBGcUV3STlvc0JnaG9PcXRDZVhQamdmYw?oc=5" target="_blank">Is AI's visual understanding mostly a 'mirage'? New research suggests so</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">inkl</font>
Google DeepMind Introduces Aletheia: The AI Agent Moving from Math Competitions to Fully Autonomous Professional Research Discoveries - marktechpost.com
<a href="https://news.google.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?oc=5" target="_blank">Google DeepMind Intro
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
Is AI's visual understanding mostly a 'mirage'? New research suggests so - inkl
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMimwFBVV95cUxNUjItTURkaldjcXhpNjA0b2dSVUhWNGRwaEkzclBMM0FFMk8wNTNsMWFDc1hmVU9jYU5jbzBKSG42WGZpbTI5TUs0R0w5Q2QxX0NCdjgtT2JtUUNsWHkxUFE1MzJjN1RxMmdmQjc5YlBsVTdfVU02Z1FZSlFrLU1hdmxibjBGcUV3STlvc0JnaG9PcXRDZVhQamdmYw?oc=5" target="_blank">Is AI's visual understanding mostly a 'mirage'? New research suggests so</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">inkl</font>
Google backs UH Mānoa AI, robotics research - University of Hawaii System
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMickFVX3lxTE04TGNzcGpVeFNibkdwMzJIOFdrMHYtSS1OUDdFZkR6RFRtUU4yYWN1MlYtRGZQazl5Y1k3SklTYURwYVBycG5NZm5zbzNfRjY0SF9WNVJfM2tTU1BOX0xfb2ZtaWFVVFp3cFg3WXJmNnQwQQ?oc=5" target="_blank">Google backs UH Mānoa AI, robotics research</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">University of Hawaii System</font>
A Retrospective on the ICLR 2026 Review Process
The selection of papers for ICLR 2026 has fully concluded. We extend our congratulations to the authors whose work will appear at the conference. Creating ICLR’s technical program requires immense effort from the authors, reviewers, and area chairs, and we thank you for your contributions and service. For researchers whose work was rejected, we hope […]
Vector Researchers present papers at ACL 2024
Vector researchers will be well represented at the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics in Bangkok, Thailand this year. 14 papers co-authored by Vector-affiliated researchers are being […] The post Vector Researchers present papers at ACL 2024 appeared first on Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence .

Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!