Neural Network Conversion of Machine Learning Pipelines
Transfer learning and knowledge distillation has recently gained a lot of attention in the deep learning community. One transfer approach, the student-teacher learning, has been shown to successfully create ``small'' student neural networks that mimic the performance of a much bigger and more complex ``teacher'' networks. In this paper, we investigate an extension to this approach and transfer from a non-neural-based machine learning pipeline as teacher to a neural network (NN) student, which would allow for joint optimization of the various pipeline components and a single unified inference e — Man-Ling Sung, Jan Silovsky, Man-Hung Siu
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Transfer learning and knowledge distillation has recently gained a lot of attention in the deep learning community. One transfer approach, the student-teacher learning, has been shown to successfully create
small'' student neural networks that mimic the performance of a much bigger and more complexteacher'' networks. In this paper, we investigate an extension to this approach and transfer from a non-neural-based machine learning pipeline as teacher to a neural network (NN) student, which would allow for joint optimization of the various pipeline components and a single unified inference engine for multiple ML tasks. In particular, we explore replacing the random forest classifier by transfer learning to a student NN. We experimented with various NN topologies on 100 OpenML tasks in which random forest has been one of the best solutions. Our results show that for the majority of the tasks, the student NN can indeed mimic the teacher if one can select the right NN hyper-parameters. We also investigated the use of random forest for selecting the right NN hyper-parameters.
Comments: Submitted and accepted to AutoML 2018 @ ICML/IJCAI-ECAI
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.25699 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2603.25699v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.25699
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Man-Ling Sung [view email] [v1] Thu, 26 Mar 2026 17:46:38 UTC (96 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Assessing Pause Thresholds for empirical Translation Process Research
arXiv:2604.01410v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Text production (and translations) proceeds in the form of stretches of typing, interrupted by keystroke pauses. It is often assumed that fast typing reflects unchallenged/automated translation production while long(er) typing pauses are indicative of translation problems, hurdles or difficulties. Building on a long discussion concerning the determination of pause thresholds that separate automated from presumably reflective translation processes (O'Brien, 2006; Alves and Vale, 2009; Timarova et al., 2011; Dragsted and Carl, 2013; Lacruz et al., 2014; Kumpulainen, 2015; Heilmann and Neumann 2016), this paper compares three recent approaches for computing these pause thresholds, and suggest and evaluate a novel method for computing Production
Friends and Grandmothers in Silico: Localizing Entity Cells in Language Models
arXiv:2604.01404v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models can answer many entity-centric factual questions, but it remains unclear which internal mechanisms are involved in this process. We study this question across multiple language models. We localize entity-selective MLP neurons using templated prompts about each entity, and then validate them with causal interventions on PopQA-based QA examples. On a curated set of 200 entities drawn from PopQA, localized neurons concentrate in early layers. Negative ablation produces entity-specific amnesia, while controlled injection at a placeholder token improves answer retrieval relative to mean-entity and wrong-cell controls. For many entities, activating a single localized neuron is sufficient to recover entity-consistent predictions once
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
Assessing Pause Thresholds for empirical Translation Process Research
arXiv:2604.01410v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Text production (and translations) proceeds in the form of stretches of typing, interrupted by keystroke pauses. It is often assumed that fast typing reflects unchallenged/automated translation production while long(er) typing pauses are indicative of translation problems, hurdles or difficulties. Building on a long discussion concerning the determination of pause thresholds that separate automated from presumably reflective translation processes (O'Brien, 2006; Alves and Vale, 2009; Timarova et al., 2011; Dragsted and Carl, 2013; Lacruz et al., 2014; Kumpulainen, 2015; Heilmann and Neumann 2016), this paper compares three recent approaches for computing these pause thresholds, and suggest and evaluate a novel method for computing Production
![[R], 31 MILLIONS High frequency data, Light GBM worked perfectly](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-neural-network-P6fqXULWLNUwjuxqUZnB3T.webp)
[R], 31 MILLIONS High frequency data, Light GBM worked perfectly
We just published a paper on predicting adverse selection in high-frequency crypto markets using LightGBM , and I wanted to share it here because the findings are directly relevant to anyone dealing high frequency data and machine learning The core problem we solved: Every market maker's nightmare — getting picked off by informed traders right before a big move. We built a model that flags those toxic seconds before they wreck you. The data: - 31,081,463 second-level observations of BTC/USDT perpetual futures on Bybit - February 2025 → February 2026 (381 raw daily files) - Strict walk-forward regime, zero lookahead bias The key results (this is the part that shocked us): Our TailScore metric — which combines predicted toxicity probability with predicted price move severity — flags the top
![[D] ACL 2026 Decision](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-satellite-bUaXYHZsoMZjyA4XgfFqkD.webp)
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!