LEMMA: Laplacian pyramids for Efficient Marine SeMAntic Segmentation
Semantic segmentation in marine environments is crucial for the autonomous navigation of unmanned surface vessels (USVs) and coastal Earth Observation events such as oil spills. However, existing methods, often relying on deep CNNs and transformer-based architectures, face challenges in deployment due to their high computational costs and resource-intensive nature. These limitations hinder the practicality of real-time, low-cost applications in real-world marine settings. To address this, we propose LEMMA, a lightweight semantic segmentation model designed specifically for accurate remote sens — Ishaan Gakhar, Laven Srivastava, Sankarshanaa Sagaram
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Semantic segmentation in marine environments is crucial for the autonomous navigation of unmanned surface vessels (USVs) and coastal Earth Observation events such as oil spills. However, existing methods, often relying on deep CNNs and transformer-based architectures, face challenges in deployment due to their high computational costs and resource-intensive nature. These limitations hinder the practicality of real-time, low-cost applications in real-world marine settings. To address this, we propose LEMMA, a lightweight semantic segmentation model designed specifically for accurate remote sensing segmentation under resource constraints. The proposed architecture leverages Laplacian Pyramids to enhance edge recognition, a critical component for effective feature extraction in complex marine environments for disaster response, environmental surveillance, and coastal monitoring. By integrating edge information early in the feature extraction process, LEMMA eliminates the need for computationally expensive feature map computations in deeper network layers, drastically reducing model size, complexity and inference time. LEMMA demonstrates state-of-the-art performance across datasets captured from diverse platforms while reducing trainable parameters and computational requirements by up to 71x, GFLOPs by up to 88.5%, and inference time by up to 84.65%, as compared to existing models. Experimental results highlight its effectiveness and real-world applicability, including 93.42% IoU on the Oil Spill dataset and 98.97% mIoU on Mastr1325.
Comments: Accepted at the MaCVi Workshop, CVPR 2026
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.25689 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2603.25689v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.25689
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Ishaan Gakhar [view email] [v1] Thu, 26 Mar 2026 17:38:16 UTC (2,783 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
![[D] Does seeing the identify of authors influence your scoring?](https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1504711434969-e33886168f5c?w=600&q=80)
[D] Does seeing the identify of authors influence your scoring?
Let's be honest, at some stage of the review process. A lot of us have gotten bored and tried to Google the papers we are reviewing. And sometimes those papers might have already been uploaded onto arXiv with the identity of the authors. Which we then tried to look them up. As a first-time reviewer, I noticed the top 2 papers in my batch happened to be the only papers in my batch that is on arXiv. I am trying to work out if revealing the author's identity had influenced my decision. Or it's just a coincidence. submitted by /u/d_edge_sword [link] [comments]
Leveraging Commit Size Context and Hyper Co-Change Graph Centralities for Defect Prediction
arXiv:2604.01132v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: File-level defect prediction models traditionally rely on product and process metrics. While process metrics effectively complement product metrics, they often overlook commit size the number of files changed per commit despite its strong association with software quality. Network centrality measures on dependency graphs have also proven to be valuable product level indicators. Motivated by this, we first redefine process metrics as commit size aware process metric vectors, transforming conventional scalar measures into 100 dimensional profiles that capture the distribution of changes across commit size strata. We then model change history as a hyper co change graph, where hyperedges naturally encode commit-size semantics. Vector centralities
Detecting Call Graph Unsoundness without Ground Truth
arXiv:2604.00885v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Java static analysis frameworks are commonly compared under the assumption that analysis algorithms and configurations compose monotonically and yield semantically comparable results across tools. In this work, we show that this assumption is fundamentally flawed. We present a large-scale empirical study of semantic consistency within and across four widely used Java static analysis frameworks: Soot, SootUp, WALA, and Doop. Using precision partial orders over analysis algorithms and configurations, we systematically identify violations where increased precision introduces new call-graph edges or amplifies inconsistencies. Our results reveal three key findings. First, algorithmic precision orders frequently break within frameworks due to moder
Containing the Reproducibility Gap: Automated Repository-Level Containerization for Scholarly Jupyter Notebooks
arXiv:2604.01072v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Computational reproducibility is fundamental to trustworthy science, yet remains difficult to achieve in practice across various research workflows, including Jupyter notebooks published alongside scholarly articles. Environment drift, undocumented dependencies and implicit execution assumptions frequently prevent independent re-execution of published research. Despite existing reproducibility guidelines, scalable and systematic infrastructure for automated assessment remains limited. We present an automated, web-oriented reproducibility engineering pipeline that reconstructs and evaluates repository-level execution environments for scholarly notebooks. The system performs dependency inference, automated container generation, and isolated exe
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!