PICon: A Multi-Turn Interrogation Framework for Evaluating Persona Agent Consistency

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Large language model (LLM)-based persona agents are rapidly being adopted as scalable proxies for human participants across diverse domains. Yet there is no systematic method for verifying whether a persona agent's responses remain free of contradictions and factual inaccuracies throughout an interaction. A principle from interrogation methodology offers a lens: no matter how elaborate a fabricated identity, systematic interrogation will expose its contradictions. We apply this principle to propose PICon, an evaluation framework that probes persona agents through logically chained multi-turn questioning. PICon evaluates consistency along three core dimensions: internal consistency (freedom from self-contradiction), external consistency (alignment with real-world facts), and retest consistency (stability under repetition). Evaluating seven groups of persona agents alongside 63 real human participants, we find that even systems previously reported as highly consistent fail to meet the human baseline across all three dimensions, revealing contradictions and evasive responses under chained questioning. This work provides both a conceptual foundation and a practical methodology for evaluating persona agents before trusting them as substitutes for human participants. We provide the source code and an interactive demo at: this https URL

Comments: 20 pages, 6 figures

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2603.25620 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2603.25620v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.25620

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Sujeong Im [view email] [v1] Thu, 26 Mar 2026 16:34:34 UTC (732 KB)