Demographic Fairness in Multimodal LLMs: A Benchmark of Gender and Ethnicity Bias in Face Verification
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have recently been explored as face verification systems that determine whether two face images are of the same person. Unlike dedicated face recognition systems, MLLMs approach this task through visual prompting and rely on general visual and reasoning abilities. However, the demographic fairness of these models remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we present a benchmarking study that evaluates nine open-source MLLMs from six model families, ranging from 2B to 8B parameters, on the IJB-C and RFW face verification protocols across four ethnicity g — Ünsal Öztürk, Hatef Otroshi Shahreza, Sébastien Marcel
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have recently been explored as face verification systems that determine whether two face images are of the same person. Unlike dedicated face recognition systems, MLLMs approach this task through visual prompting and rely on general visual and reasoning abilities. However, the demographic fairness of these models remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we present a benchmarking study that evaluates nine open-source MLLMs from six model families, ranging from 2B to 8B parameters, on the IJB-C and RFW face verification protocols across four ethnicity groups and two gender groups. We measure verification accuracy with the Equal Error Rate and True Match Rate at multiple operating points per demographic group, and we quantify demographic disparity with four FMR-based fairness metrics. Our results show that FaceLLM-8B, the only face-specialised model in our study, substantially outperforms general-purpose MLLMs on both benchmarks. The bias patterns we observe differ from those commonly reported for traditional face recognition, with different groups being most affected depending on the benchmark and the model. We also note that the most accurate models are not necessarily the fairest and that models with poor overall accuracy can appear fair simply because they produce uniformly high error rates across all demographic groups.
Comments: Accepted in CVPR 2026 workshops
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.25613 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2603.25613v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.25613
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Hatef Otroshi Shahreza [view email] [v1] Thu, 26 Mar 2026 16:30:00 UTC (1,027 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
How AIRA2 breaks AI research bottlenecks
While we've seen remarkable progress in AI for coding and mathematics, creating agents that can navigate the messy, open-ended nature of real research (where things break for no obvious reason) has proven far more challenging.
Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models - WSJ
<a href="https://news.google.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?oc=5" target="_blank">Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">WSJ</font>
Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models - WSJ
<a href="https://news.google.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?oc=5" target="_blank">Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">WSJ</font>
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
AI Inspires New Research Topics In Materials Science - miragenews.com
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMihwFBVV95cUxQRlVFdkRBaHRvYkJJdFRlMTZmajEzeFRPU0hGWWdfbi02V1FnTUdVQ2pmY2VZLUV2NlB4V3BFdEVlSVZkUlhRSTZaNWFKMmcyWXJYbnNqbUhMTmp0NnFtMEppOXlPZkJSNHJfck5VSEVYcmUtX1k2QkJlR1BvUEdTTkp3UmlYRkk?oc=5" target="_blank">AI Inspires New Research Topics In Materials Science</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">miragenews.com</font>
From brain scans to alloys: Teaching AI to make sense of complex research data - Penn State University
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiwAFBVV95cUxPZDFHdkptQ2VUM2hmWjhqQkxoRnBiTWoxMXRRR21MUG5TamdUMlFRWmhvYVNHaFVNREVKU3VmSnVOdDVZYnNLb2ppYXRVRTZmVFVMV1pLTlVhUm9ybTNZbGtvZTdIMnIyMHNpOEk5aU9TSmxxS2Y4V2MwazYwY3JlX1Axbk1nd3pfcWhFdUJaaDJWRXJaMFIyTTROcmFHeXI3ZzFudXJ2M1h6UHI1LW1Ca1dta2RkM3BiYndocGk3Yjg?oc=5" target="_blank">From brain scans to alloys: Teaching AI to make sense of complex research data</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Penn State University</font>

Locating Risk: Task Designers and the Challenge of Risk Disclosure in RAI Content Work
arXiv:2505.24246v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As AI systems are increasingly tested and deployed in open-ended and high-stakes domains, crowdworkers are often tasked with responsible AI (RAI) content work. These tasks include labeling violent content, moderating disturbing text, or simulating harmful behavior for red teaming exercises to shape AI system behaviors. While prior research efforts have highlighted the risks to worker well-being associated with RAI content work, far less attention has been paid to how these risks are communicated to workers by task designers or individuals who design and post RAI tasks. Existing transparency frameworks and guidelines, such as model cards, datasheets, and crowdworksheets, focus on documenting model information and dataset collection process

Togedule: Scheduling Meetings with Large Language Models and Adaptive Representations of Group Availability
arXiv:2505.01000v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Scheduling is a perennial-and often challenging-problem for many groups. Existing tools are mostly static, showing an identical set of choices to everyone, regardless of the current status of attendees' inputs and preferences. In this paper, we propose Togedule, an adaptive scheduling tool that uses large language models to dynamically adjust the pool of choices and their presentation format. With the initial prototype, we conducted a formative study (N=10) and identified the potential benefits and risks of such an adaptive scheduling tool. Then, after enhancing the system, we conducted two controlled experiments, one each for attendees and organizers (total N=66). For each experiment, we compared scheduling with verbal messages, shared c
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!