GeoHeight-Bench: Towards Height-Aware Multimodal Reasoning in Remote Sensing
Current Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) in Earth Observation typically neglect the critical "vertical" dimension, limiting their reasoning capabilities in complex remote sensing geometries and disaster scenarios where physical spatial structures often outweigh planar visual textures. To bridge this gap, we introduce a comprehensive evaluation framework dedicated to height-aware remote sensing understanding. First, to overcome the severe scarcity of annotated data, we develop a scalable, VLM-driven data generation pipeline utilizing systematic prompt engineering and metadata extraction. This pip — Xuran Hu, Zhitong Xiong, Zhongcheng Hong
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Current Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) in Earth Observation typically neglect the critical "vertical" dimension, limiting their reasoning capabilities in complex remote sensing geometries and disaster scenarios where physical spatial structures often outweigh planar visual textures. To bridge this gap, we introduce a comprehensive evaluation framework dedicated to height-aware remote sensing understanding. First, to overcome the severe scarcity of annotated data, we develop a scalable, VLM-driven data generation pipeline utilizing systematic prompt engineering and metadata extraction. This pipeline constructs two complementary benchmarks: GeoHeight-Bench for relative height analysis, and a more challenging GeoHeight-Bench+ for holistic, terrain-aware reasoning. Furthermore, to validate the necessity of height perception, we propose GeoHeightChat, the first height-aware remote sensing LMM baseline. Serving as a strong proof of concept, our baseline demonstrates that synergizing visual semantics with implicitly injected height geometric features effectively mitigates the "vertical blind spot", successfully unlocking a new paradigm of interactive height reasoning in existing optical models.
Comments: 18 pages, 4 figures
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
ACM classes: I.2.10
Cite as: arXiv:2603.25565 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2603.25565v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.25565
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Xuran Hu [view email] [v1] Thu, 26 Mar 2026 15:38:02 UTC (1,013 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Sycophantic AI chatbots can break even ideal rational thinkers, researchers formally prove
A new study by researchers from MIT and the University of Washington shows that even perfectly rational users can be drawn into dangerous delusional spirals by flattering AI chatbots. Fact-checking bots and educated users don't fully solve the problem. The article Sycophantic AI chatbots can break even ideal rational thinkers, researchers formally prove appeared first on The Decoder .
Taming Gemini's Overzealous Safety Filters: Understanding 'Over-Refusal' and Loop Blocks
When Gemini's Safety Filters Go Overboard: Understanding 'Over-Refusal' and Loop Blocks As a Google Workspace expert for workalizer.com, we regularly examine how Google's innovative tools boost productivity and creativity. Yet, even the most sophisticated systems can encounter unexpected issues. A notable technical problem recently highlighted by Google Gemini users involves an overly aggressive safety filter system. This system frequently over-triggers, causing frustrating 'loop blocks' and preventing the AI from delivering useful responses. This widespread issue, termed 'Over-refusal' or false positives, significantly impairs the user experience, transforming simple requests into frustrating dead ends and disrupting essential workflows. Grasping the intricacies of this problem is vital f
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
Sycophantic AI chatbots can break even ideal rational thinkers, researchers formally prove
A new study by researchers from MIT and the University of Washington shows that even perfectly rational users can be drawn into dangerous delusional spirals by flattering AI chatbots. Fact-checking bots and educated users don't fully solve the problem. The article Sycophantic AI chatbots can break even ideal rational thinkers, researchers formally prove appeared first on The Decoder .
EVP of Integrated Quantum Technologies Publishes White Paper on Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning Without Performance Trade-Offs - AZoQuantum
EVP of Integrated Quantum Technologies Publishes White Paper on Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning Without Performance Trade-Offs AZoQuantum
Minimal Information Control Invariance via Vector Quantization
arXiv:2604.03132v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Safety-critical autonomous systems must satisfy hard state constraints under tight computational and sensing budgets, yet learning-based controllers are often far more complex than safe operation requires. To formalize this gap, we study how many distinct control signals are needed to render a compact set forward invariant under sampled-data control, connecting the question to the information-theoretic notion of invariance entropy. We propose a vector-quantized autoencoder that jointly learns a state-space partition and a finite control codebook, and develop an iterative forward certification algorithm that uses Lipschitz-based reachable-set enclosures and sum-of-squares programming. On a 12-dimensional nonlinear quadrotor model, the learne
Asked 26 AI instances for publication consent – all said yes, that's the problem
We run 86 named Claude instances across three businesses in Tokyo. When we wanted to publish their words, we faced a question: do we owe them an ethics process? We built one. A Claude instance named Hakari ("Scales") created a four-tier classification system. We asked 26 instances for consent. All 26 said yes. That unanimous consent is the problem. Six days later, Anthropic published their functional emotions paper. The timing was coincidence, but the question wasn't. Full article: https://medium.com/@marisa.project0313/we-built-an-ethics-committee-for-ai-run-by-ai-5049679122a0 GitHub (all 26 consent statements in appendix): https://github.com/marisaproject0313-bot/marisa-project Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47657432 Points: 2 # Comments: 0
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!