Missing-Aware Multimodal Fusion for Unified Microservice Incident Management
Automated incident management is critical for microservice reliability. While recent unified frameworks leverage multimodal data for joint optimization, they unrealistically assume perfect data completeness. In practice, network fluctuations and agent failures frequently cause missing modalities. Existing approaches relying on static placeholders introduce imputation noise that masks anomalies and degrades performance. To address this, we propose ARMOR, a robust self-supervised framework designed for missing modality scenarios. ARMOR features: (i) a modality-specific asymmetric encoder that is — Wenzhuo Qian, Hailiang Zhao, Ziqi Wang
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Automated incident management is critical for microservice reliability. While recent unified frameworks leverage multimodal data for joint optimization, they unrealistically assume perfect data completeness. In practice, network fluctuations and agent failures frequently cause missing modalities. Existing approaches relying on static placeholders introduce imputation noise that masks anomalies and degrades performance. To address this, we propose ARMOR, a robust self-supervised framework designed for missing modality scenarios. ARMOR features: (i) a modality-specific asymmetric encoder that isolates distribution disparities among metrics, logs, and traces; and (ii) a missing-aware gated fusion mechanism utilizing learnable placeholders and dynamic bias compensation to prevent cross-modal interference from incomplete inputs. By employing self-supervised auto-regression with mask-guided reconstruction, ARMOR jointly optimizes anomaly detection (AD), failure triage (FT), and root cause localization (RCL). AD and RCL require no fault labels, while FT relies solely on failure-type annotations for the downstream classifier. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ARMOR achieves state-of-the-art performance under complete data conditions and maintains robust diagnostic accuracy even with severe modality loss.
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Software Engineering (cs.SE)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.25538 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2603.25538v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.25538
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Wenzhuo Qian [view email] [v1] Thu, 26 Mar 2026 15:14:57 UTC (469 KB) [v2] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 12:10:16 UTC (469 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Building a Production RAG Pipeline: Lessons from Real-World AI Apps
Building a Production RAG Pipeline: Lessons from Real-World AI Apps RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) sounds simple on paper — embed your documents, store them in a vector DB, retrieve the relevant chunks, and pass them to an LLM. In practice, getting a RAG pipeline to production quality is significantly harder. Here's what I learned building RAG pipelines for real SaaS products. The Naive Implementation Most tutorials show you this flow: Chunk your documents Embed them with OpenAI Store in Pinecone Retrieve top-k chunks Pass to GPT-4 This works fine in demos. It fails in production for a few key reasons. Problem 1: Chunking Strategy Kills Retrieval Quality Naive fixed-size chunking (every 512 tokens) destroys semantic context. A paragraph about "authentication" gets split mid-sentence,
I Made Parseltongue
Yes, that one from HPMoR by @Eliezer Yudkowsky . And I mean it absolutely literally - this is a language designed to make lies inexpressible. It catches LLMs' ungrounded statements, incoherent logic and hallucinations. Comes with notebooks (Jupyter-style), server for use with agents, and inspection tooling. Github , Documentation . Works everywhere - even in the web Claude with the code execution sandbox. How Unsophisticated lies and manipulations are typically ungrounded or include logical inconsistencies. Coherent, factually grounded deception is a problem whose complexity grows exponentially - and our AI is far from solving such tasks. There will still be a theoretical possibility to do it - especially under incomplete information - and we have a guarantee that there is no full computat
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!