Lightweight GenAI for Network Traffic Synthesis: Fidelity, Augmentation, and Classification
Accurate Network Traffic Classification (NTC) is increasingly constrained by limited labeled data and strict privacy requirements. While Network Traffic Generation (NTG) provides an effective means to mitigate data scarcity, conventional generative methods struggle to model the complex temporal dynamics of modern traffic or/and often incur significant computational cost. In this article, we address the NTG task using lightweight Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) architectures, including transformer-based, state-space, and diffusion models designed for practical deployment. We conduct — Giampaolo Bovenzi, Domenico Ciuonzo, Jonatan Krolikowski
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Accurate Network Traffic Classification (NTC) is increasingly constrained by limited labeled data and strict privacy requirements. While Network Traffic Generation (NTG) provides an effective means to mitigate data scarcity, conventional generative methods struggle to model the complex temporal dynamics of modern traffic or/and often incur significant computational cost. In this article, we address the NTG task using lightweight Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) architectures, including transformer-based, state-space, and diffusion models designed for practical deployment. We conduct a systematic evaluation along four axes: (i) (synthetic) traffic fidelity, (ii) synthetic-only training, (iii) data augmentation under low-data regimes, and (iv) computational efficiency. Experiments on two heterogeneous datasets show that lightweight GenAI models preserve both static and temporal traffic characteristics, with transformer and state-space models closely matching real distributions across a complete set of fidelity metrics. Classifiers trained solely on synthetic traffic achieve up to 87% F1-score on real data. In low-data settings, GenAI-driven augmentation improves NTC performance by up to +40%, substantially reducing the gap with full-data training. Overall, transformer-based models provide the best trade-off between fidelity and efficiency, enabling high-quality, privacy-aware traffic synthesis with modest computational overhead.
Comments: 7 pages, 3 figures, 3 tables, 4 research questions, preprint submitted to IEEE Communications Magazine
Subjects:
Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
ACM classes: C.2.3; C.2.4; C.2.5; I.2.1; I.2.m
Cite as: arXiv:2603.25507 [cs.NI]
(or arXiv:2603.25507v1 [cs.NI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.25507
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Antonio Montieri [view email] [v1] Thu, 26 Mar 2026 14:45:04 UTC (1,262 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
![[D] Does seeing the identify of authors influence your scoring?](https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1504711434969-e33886168f5c?w=600&q=80)
[D] Does seeing the identify of authors influence your scoring?
Let's be honest, at some stage of the review process. A lot of us have gotten bored and tried to Google the papers we are reviewing. And sometimes those papers might have already been uploaded onto arXiv with the identity of the authors. Which we then tried to look them up. As a first-time reviewer, I noticed the top 2 papers in my batch happened to be the only papers in my batch that is on arXiv. I am trying to work out if revealing the author's identity had influenced my decision. Or it's just a coincidence. submitted by /u/d_edge_sword [link] [comments]
Leveraging Commit Size Context and Hyper Co-Change Graph Centralities for Defect Prediction
arXiv:2604.01132v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: File-level defect prediction models traditionally rely on product and process metrics. While process metrics effectively complement product metrics, they often overlook commit size the number of files changed per commit despite its strong association with software quality. Network centrality measures on dependency graphs have also proven to be valuable product level indicators. Motivated by this, we first redefine process metrics as commit size aware process metric vectors, transforming conventional scalar measures into 100 dimensional profiles that capture the distribution of changes across commit size strata. We then model change history as a hyper co change graph, where hyperedges naturally encode commit-size semantics. Vector centralities
Detecting Call Graph Unsoundness without Ground Truth
arXiv:2604.00885v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Java static analysis frameworks are commonly compared under the assumption that analysis algorithms and configurations compose monotonically and yield semantically comparable results across tools. In this work, we show that this assumption is fundamentally flawed. We present a large-scale empirical study of semantic consistency within and across four widely used Java static analysis frameworks: Soot, SootUp, WALA, and Doop. Using precision partial orders over analysis algorithms and configurations, we systematically identify violations where increased precision introduces new call-graph edges or amplifies inconsistencies. Our results reveal three key findings. First, algorithmic precision orders frequently break within frameworks due to moder
Containing the Reproducibility Gap: Automated Repository-Level Containerization for Scholarly Jupyter Notebooks
arXiv:2604.01072v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Computational reproducibility is fundamental to trustworthy science, yet remains difficult to achieve in practice across various research workflows, including Jupyter notebooks published alongside scholarly articles. Environment drift, undocumented dependencies and implicit execution assumptions frequently prevent independent re-execution of published research. Despite existing reproducibility guidelines, scalable and systematic infrastructure for automated assessment remains limited. We present an automated, web-oriented reproducibility engineering pipeline that reconstructs and evaluates repository-level execution environments for scholarly notebooks. The system performs dependency inference, automated container generation, and isolated exe
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!