Decidable By Construction: Design-Time Verification for Trustworthy AI
A prevailing assumption in machine learning is that model correctness must be enforced after the fact. We observe that the properties determining whether an AI model is numerically stable, computationally correct, or consistent with a physical domain do not necessarily demand post hoc enforcement. They can be verified at design time, before training begins, at marginal computational cost, with particular relevance to models deployed in high-leverage decision support and scientifically constrained settings. These properties share a specific algebraic structure: they are expressible as constrain — Houston Haynes
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:A prevailing assumption in machine learning is that model correctness must be enforced after the fact. We observe that the properties determining whether an AI model is numerically stable, computationally correct, or consistent with a physical domain do not necessarily demand post hoc enforcement. They can be verified at design time, before training begins, at marginal computational cost, with particular relevance to models deployed in high-leverage decision support and scientifically constrained settings. These properties share a specific algebraic structure: they are expressible as constraints over finitely generated abelian groups $\mathbb{Z}^n$, where inference is decidable in polynomial time and the principal type is unique. A framework built on this observation composes three prior results (arXiv:2603.16437, arXiv:2603.17627, arXiv:2603.18104): a dimensional type system carrying arbitrary annotations as persistent codata through model elaboration; a program hypergraph that infers Clifford algebra grade and derives geometric product sparsity from type signatures alone; and an adaptive domain model architecture preserving both invariants through training via forward-mode coeffect analysis and exact posit accumulation. We believe this composition yields a novel information-theoretic result: Hindley-Milner unification over abelian groups computes the maximum a posteriori hypothesis under a computable restriction of Solomonoff's universal prior, placing the framework's type inference on the same formal ground as universal induction. We compare four contemporary approaches to AI reliability and show that each imposes overhead that can compound across deployments, layers, and inference requests. This framework eliminates that overhead by construction.
Comments: 18 pages, 1 figure
Subjects:
Programming Languages (cs.PL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.25414 [cs.PL]
(or arXiv:2603.25414v1 [cs.PL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.25414
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Houston Haynes [view email] [v1] Thu, 26 Mar 2026 13:09:36 UTC (21 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers

New research could empower people without AI expertise to help create trustworthy AI applications
Involving people without AI expertise in the development and evaluation of artificial intelligence applications could help create better, fairer, and more trustworthy automated decision-making systems, new research suggests. After enlisting members of the public to evaluate the potential impacts of two real-world applications, researchers from UK universities will present a paper at a major international computing conference which suggests how "participatory AI auditing" could improve AI decision-making in the future.
Consistency Amplifies: How Behavioral Variance Shapes Agent Accuracy
Analysis of behavioral consistency in large language model agents reveals that while consistent performance correlates with higher accuracy, consistency can amplify both correct and incorrect interpretations, emphasizing that accurate interpretation is more crucial than execution consistency for production deployment. (2 upvotes on HuggingFace)





Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!