Beyond Content Safety: Real-Time Monitoring for Reasoning Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on explicit chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning to solve complex tasks, yet the safety of the reasoning process itself remains largely unaddressed. Existing work on LLM safety focuses on content safety--detecting harmful, biased, or factually incorrect outputs -- and treats the reasoning chain as an opaque intermediate artifact. We identify reasoning safety as an orthogonal and equally critical security dimension: the requirement that a model's reasoning trajectory be logically consistent, computationally efficient, and resistant to adversarial manip — Xunguang Wang, Yuguang Zhou, Qingyue Wang
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on explicit chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning to solve complex tasks, yet the safety of the reasoning process itself remains largely unaddressed. Existing work on LLM safety focuses on content safety--detecting harmful, biased, or factually incorrect outputs -- and treats the reasoning chain as an opaque intermediate artifact. We identify reasoning safety as an orthogonal and equally critical security dimension: the requirement that a model's reasoning trajectory be logically consistent, computationally efficient, and resistant to adversarial manipulation. We make three contributions. First, we formally define reasoning safety and introduce a nine-category taxonomy of unsafe reasoning behaviors, covering input parsing errors, reasoning execution errors, and process management errors. Second, we conduct a large-scale prevalence study annotating 4111 reasoning chains from both natural reasoning benchmarks and four adversarial attack methods (reasoning hijacking and denial-of-service), confirming that all nine error types occur in practice and that each attack induces a mechanistically interpretable signature. Third, we propose a Reasoning Safety Monitor: an external LLM-based component that runs in parallel with the target model, inspects each reasoning step in real time via a taxonomy-embedded prompt, and dispatches an interrupt signal upon detecting unsafe behavior. Evaluation on a 450-chain static benchmark shows that our monitor achieves up to 84.88% step-level localization accuracy and 85.37% error-type classification accuracy, outperforming hallucination detectors and process reward model baselines by substantial margins. These results demonstrate that reasoning-level monitoring is both necessary and practically achievable, and establish reasoning safety as a foundational concern for the secure deployment of large reasoning models.
Subjects:
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.25412 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2603.25412v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.25412
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Xunguang Wang [view email] [v1] Thu, 26 Mar 2026 13:08:56 UTC (159 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
How AIRA2 breaks AI research bottlenecks
While we've seen remarkable progress in AI for coding and mathematics, creating agents that can navigate the messy, open-ended nature of real research (where things break for no obvious reason) has proven far more challenging.
Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models - WSJ
<a href="https://news.google.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?oc=5" target="_blank">Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">WSJ</font>
Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models - WSJ
<a href="https://news.google.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?oc=5" target="_blank">Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">WSJ</font>
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
AI Inspires New Research Topics In Materials Science - miragenews.com
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMihwFBVV95cUxQRlVFdkRBaHRvYkJJdFRlMTZmajEzeFRPU0hGWWdfbi02V1FnTUdVQ2pmY2VZLUV2NlB4V3BFdEVlSVZkUlhRSTZaNWFKMmcyWXJYbnNqbUhMTmp0NnFtMEppOXlPZkJSNHJfck5VSEVYcmUtX1k2QkJlR1BvUEdTTkp3UmlYRkk?oc=5" target="_blank">AI Inspires New Research Topics In Materials Science</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">miragenews.com</font>
From brain scans to alloys: Teaching AI to make sense of complex research data - Penn State University
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiwAFBVV95cUxPZDFHdkptQ2VUM2hmWjhqQkxoRnBiTWoxMXRRR21MUG5TamdUMlFRWmhvYVNHaFVNREVKU3VmSnVOdDVZYnNLb2ppYXRVRTZmVFVMV1pLTlVhUm9ybTNZbGtvZTdIMnIyMHNpOEk5aU9TSmxxS2Y4V2MwazYwY3JlX1Axbk1nd3pfcWhFdUJaaDJWRXJaMFIyTTROcmFHeXI3ZzFudXJ2M1h6UHI1LW1Ca1dta2RkM3BiYndocGk3Yjg?oc=5" target="_blank">From brain scans to alloys: Teaching AI to make sense of complex research data</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Penn State University</font>

Locating Risk: Task Designers and the Challenge of Risk Disclosure in RAI Content Work
arXiv:2505.24246v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As AI systems are increasingly tested and deployed in open-ended and high-stakes domains, crowdworkers are often tasked with responsible AI (RAI) content work. These tasks include labeling violent content, moderating disturbing text, or simulating harmful behavior for red teaming exercises to shape AI system behaviors. While prior research efforts have highlighted the risks to worker well-being associated with RAI content work, far less attention has been paid to how these risks are communicated to workers by task designers or individuals who design and post RAI tasks. Existing transparency frameworks and guidelines, such as model cards, datasheets, and crowdworksheets, focus on documenting model information and dataset collection process

Togedule: Scheduling Meetings with Large Language Models and Adaptive Representations of Group Availability
arXiv:2505.01000v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Scheduling is a perennial-and often challenging-problem for many groups. Existing tools are mostly static, showing an identical set of choices to everyone, regardless of the current status of attendees' inputs and preferences. In this paper, we propose Togedule, an adaptive scheduling tool that uses large language models to dynamically adjust the pool of choices and their presentation format. With the initial prototype, we conducted a formative study (N=10) and identified the potential benefits and risks of such an adaptive scheduling tool. Then, after enhancing the system, we conducted two controlled experiments, one each for attendees and organizers (total N=66). For each experiment, we compared scheduling with verbal messages, shared c
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!