LaMP: Learning Vision-Language-Action Policies with 3D Scene Flow as Latent Motion Prior
We introduce \textbf{LaMP}, a dual-expert Vision-Language-Action framework that embeds dense 3D scene flow as a latent motion prior for robotic manipulation. Existing VLA models regress actions directly from 2D semantic visual features, forcing them to learn complex 3D physical interactions implicitly. This implicit learning strategy degrades under unfamiliar spatial dynamics. LaMP addresses this limitation by aligning a flow-matching \emph{Motion Expert} with a policy-predicting \emph{Action Expert} through gated cross-attention. Specifically, the Motion Expert generates a one-step partially — Xinkai Wang, Chenyi Wang, Yifu Xu
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:We introduce \textbf{LaMP}, a dual-expert Vision-Language-Action framework that embeds dense 3D scene flow as a latent motion prior for robotic manipulation. Existing VLA models regress actions directly from 2D semantic visual features, forcing them to learn complex 3D physical interactions implicitly. This implicit learning strategy degrades under unfamiliar spatial dynamics. LaMP addresses this limitation by aligning a flow-matching \emph{Motion Expert} with a policy-predicting \emph{Action Expert} through gated cross-attention. Specifically, the Motion Expert generates a one-step partially denoised 3D scene flow, and its hidden states condition the Action Expert without full multi-step reconstruction. We evaluate LaMP on the LIBERO, LIBERO-Plus, and SimplerEnv-WidowX simulation benchmarks as well as real-world experiments. LaMP consistently outperforms evaluated VLA baselines across LIBERO, LIBERO-Plus, and SimplerEnv-WidowX benchmarks, achieving the highest reported average success rates under the same training budgets. On LIBERO-Plus OOD perturbations, LaMP shows improved robustness with an average 9.7% gain over the strongest prior baseline. Our project page is available at this https URL.
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Robotics (cs.RO)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.25399 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2603.25399v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.25399
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Xinkai Wang [view email] [v1] Thu, 26 Mar 2026 12:47:51 UTC (22,938 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Looking for Help on Building a Cheap/Budget Dedicated AI System
I’ve been getting into the whole AI field over the course of the year and I’ve strictly said to NEVER use cloud based AI (Or under VERY strict and specific circumstances). For example, i was using Opencode’s cloud servers, but only because it was through their own community maintained infrastructure/servers and also it was about as secure as it gets when it comes to cloud AI. But anything else is a hard NO. I’ve been using my main machine (Specs on user) and so far it’s been pretty good. Depending on the model, I can run 30-40B models at about 25-35 tok/s, which for me is completely usable, anything under or close to 10 tok/s is pretty unusable for me. But anyways, that has been great for me, but I’m slowly running into VRAM and GPU limitations, so I think it’s time to get some dedicated h
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers

Request for arXiv cs.AI Endorsement – Life-Aligned AI Framework
Hi everyone, I’m preparing to submit a paper to arXiv (cs.AI, with cross-lists to q-bio.PE and physics.soc-ph) and am currently awaiting endorsement from a qualified author. Posting here in case anyone in this community can help or knows someone who can. Title: Life-Aligned AI: A Framework for Grounding Artificial Intelligence in the Empirical Conditions of Flourishing Here’s the main idea: Current alignment approaches work backwards — rules imposed in advance by minds that the systems they constrain may eventually exceed. This paper proposes a different starting point: training AI on living systems — the only adaptive framework continuously pressure-tested across four billion years under conditions of genuine consequence — and letting the operating principles emerge from genuine reasoning




![Thoughts on AI and Research [pdf]](https://d2xsxph8kpxj0f.cloudfront.net/310419663032563854/konzwo8nGf8Z4uZsMefwMr/default-img-robot-hand-JvPW6jsLFTCtkgtb97Kys5.webp)
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!