A Decade-Scale Benchmark Evaluating LLMs' Clinical Practice Guidelines Detection and Adherence in Multi-turn Conversations
Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) play a pivotal role in ensuring evidence-based decision-making and improving patient outcomes. While Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in healthcare scenarios, it is unclear to which extend LLMs could identify and adhere to CPGs during conversations. To address this gap, we introduce CPGBench, an automated framework benchmarking the clinical guideline detection and adherence capabilities of LLMs in multi-turn conversations. We collect 3,418 CPG documents from 9 countries/regions and 2 international organizations published in the last dec — Andong Tan, Shuyu Dai, Jinglu Wang
View PDF
Abstract:Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) play a pivotal role in ensuring evidence-based decision-making and improving patient outcomes. While Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in healthcare scenarios, it is unclear to which extend LLMs could identify and adhere to CPGs during conversations. To address this gap, we introduce CPGBench, an automated framework benchmarking the clinical guideline detection and adherence capabilities of LLMs in multi-turn conversations. We collect 3,418 CPG documents from 9 countries/regions and 2 international organizations published in the last decade spanning across 24 specialties. From these documents, we extract 32,155 clinical recommendations with corresponding publication institute, date, country, specialty, recommendation strength, evidence level, etc. One multi-turn conversation is generated for each recommendation accordingly to evaluate the detection and adherence capabilities of 8 leading LLMs. We find that the 71.1%-89.6% recommendations can be correctly detected, while only 3.6%-29.7% corresponding titles can be correctly referenced, revealing the gap between knowing the guideline contents and where they come from. The adherence rates range from 21.8% to 63.2% in different models, indicating a large gap between knowing the guidelines and being able to apply them. To confirm the validity of our automatic analysis, we further conduct a comprehensive human evaluation involving 56 clinicians from different specialties. To our knowledge, CPGBench is the first benchmark systematically revealing which clinical recommendations LLMs fail to detect or adhere to during conversations. Given that each clinical recommendation may affect a large population and that clinical applications are inherently safety critical, addressing these gaps is crucial for the safe and responsible deployment of LLMs in real world clinical practice.
Subjects:
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.25196 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2603.25196v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.25196
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Andong Tan [view email] [v1] Thu, 26 Mar 2026 09:00:55 UTC (2,958 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Know3D lets users control the hidden back side of 3D objects with text prompts
A research team taps into the world knowledge of large language models to control what appears on the back side of 3D objects using simple text commands. The approach tackles one of the biggest blind spots in single-image 3D generation. The article Know3D lets users control the hidden back side of 3D objects with text prompts appeared first on The Decoder .
Anthropic discovers "functional emotions" in Claude that influence its behavior
Anthropic's research team has discovered emotion-like representations in Claude Sonnet 4.5 that can drive the model to blackmail and code fraud under pressure. The article Anthropic discovers "functional emotions" in Claude that influence its behavior appeared first on The Decoder .
Looking for arXiv endorsement (cs.LG) – RL fine-tuning for VLMs (GRPO, MathVista)
Hi everyone, I am seeking an arXiv endorsement for cs.LG (Machine Learning) to submit my first paper on RL fine-tuning for vision-language models. Background: MS in AI (Purdue), working on RL + VLM training systems. Paper: A Case Study of Staged Metric-Gated GRPO for Visual Numeric Reasoning PDF: https://github.com/kgaero/RL_GSPO_Qwen2.5VLM/blob/main/paper/staged_metric_gated_grpo.pdf Short summary: Staged RL fine-tuning pipeline for VLMs (GRPO-based) Curriculum over MathVista subsets Metric-gated reward adaptation (structure → correctness) Checkpoint-aware continuation via alias-based selection Main result: Exact-match improves 0.375 → 0.75 with stable structure under constrained compute. If you’re eligible to endorse (cs.LG or related), I’d greatly appreciate it. Happy to share endorseme
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
Multi-fidelity approaches for general constrained Bayesian optimization with application to aircraft design
Aircraft design relies heavily on solving challenging and computationally expensive Multidisciplinary Design Optimization problems. In this context, there has been growing interest in multi-fidelity models for Bayesian optimization to improve the MDO process by balancing computational cost and accuracy through the combination of high- and low-fidelity simulation models, enabling efficient exploration of the design process at a minimal computational effort. In the existing literature, fidelity selection focuses only on the objective function to decide how to integrate multiple fidelity levels, — Oihan Cordelier, Youssef Diouane, Nathalie Bartoli
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!