Live
Black Hat USADark ReadingBlack Hat AsiaAI BusinessSingle-cell imaging and machine learning reveal hidden coordination in algae's response to light stress - MSNGoogle News: Machine LearningGoogle Dramatically Upgrades Storage in Google AI Pro - Thurrott.comGoogle News: GeminiOpenAI Won't Save ARKK (BATS:ARKK) - seekingalpha.comGoogle News: OpenAINavigating the Challenges of Cross-functional Teams: the Role of Governance and Common GoalsDEV Community[Side B] Pursuing OSS Quality Assurance with AI: Achieving 369 Tests, 97% Coverage, and GIL-Free CompatibilityDEV Community[Side A] Completely Defending Python from OOM Kills: The BytesIO Trap and D-MemFS 'Hard Quota' Design PhilosophyDEV CommunityFrom Attention Economy to Thinking Economy: The AI ChallengeDEV CommunityHow We're Approaching a County-Level Education Data System EngagementDEV CommunityI Built a Portable Text Editor for Windows — One .exe File, No Installation, Forever FreeDEV CommunityBuilding Global Crisis Monitor: A Real-Time Geopolitical Intelligence DashboardDEV CommunityGoogle's TurboQuant saves memory, but won't save us from DRAM-pricing hellThe Register AI/MLWriting Better RFCs and Design DocsDEV CommunityBlack Hat USADark ReadingBlack Hat AsiaAI BusinessSingle-cell imaging and machine learning reveal hidden coordination in algae's response to light stress - MSNGoogle News: Machine LearningGoogle Dramatically Upgrades Storage in Google AI Pro - Thurrott.comGoogle News: GeminiOpenAI Won't Save ARKK (BATS:ARKK) - seekingalpha.comGoogle News: OpenAINavigating the Challenges of Cross-functional Teams: the Role of Governance and Common GoalsDEV Community[Side B] Pursuing OSS Quality Assurance with AI: Achieving 369 Tests, 97% Coverage, and GIL-Free CompatibilityDEV Community[Side A] Completely Defending Python from OOM Kills: The BytesIO Trap and D-MemFS 'Hard Quota' Design PhilosophyDEV CommunityFrom Attention Economy to Thinking Economy: The AI ChallengeDEV CommunityHow We're Approaching a County-Level Education Data System EngagementDEV CommunityI Built a Portable Text Editor for Windows — One .exe File, No Installation, Forever FreeDEV CommunityBuilding Global Crisis Monitor: A Real-Time Geopolitical Intelligence DashboardDEV CommunityGoogle's TurboQuant saves memory, but won't save us from DRAM-pricing hellThe Register AI/MLWriting Better RFCs and Design DocsDEV Community

Do LLMs Know What They Know? Measuring Metacognitive Efficiency with Signal Detection Theory

arXivMarch 26, 202610 min read0 views
Source Quiz

Standard evaluation of LLM confidence relies on calibration metrics (ECE, Brier score) that conflate two distinct capacities: how much a model knows (Type-1 sensitivity) and how well it knows what it knows (Type-2 metacognitive sensitivity). We introduce an evaluation framework based on Type-2 Signal Detection Theory that decomposes these capacities using meta-d' and the metacognitive efficiency ratio M-ratio. Applied to four LLMs (Llama-3-8B-Instruct, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3, Llama-3-8B-Base, Gemma-2-9B-Instruct) across 224,000 factual QA trials, we find: (1) metacognitive efficiency varies — Jon-Paul Cacioli

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Standard evaluation of LLM confidence relies on calibration metrics (ECE, Brier score) that conflate two distinct capacities: how much a model knows (Type-1 sensitivity) and how well it knows what it knows (Type-2 metacognitive sensitivity). We introduce an evaluation framework based on Type-2 Signal Detection Theory that decomposes these capacities using meta-d' and the metacognitive efficiency ratio M-ratio. Applied to four LLMs (Llama-3-8B-Instruct, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3, Llama-3-8B-Base, Gemma-2-9B-Instruct) across 224,000 factual QA trials, we find: (1) metacognitive efficiency varies substantially across models even when Type-1 sensitivity is similar -- Mistral achieves the highest d' but the lowest M-ratio; (2) metacognitive efficiency is domain-specific, with different models showing different weakest domains, invisible to aggregate metrics; (3) temperature manipulation shifts Type-2 criterion while meta-d' remains stable for two of four models, dissociating confidence policy from metacognitive capacity; (4) AUROC_2 and M-ratio produce fully inverted model rankings, demonstrating these metrics answer fundamentally different evaluation questions. The meta-d' framework reveals which models "know what they don't know" versus which merely appear well-calibrated due to criterion placement -- a distinction with direct implications for model selection, deployment, and human-AI collaboration. Pre-registered analysis; code and data publicly available.

Comments: 12 pages, 3 figures, 7 tables. Pre-registered; code and data at this https URL

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

ACM classes: I.2.7; I.5.1

Cite as: arXiv:2603.25112 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2603.25112v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.25112

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Jon-Paul Cacioli [view email] [v1] Thu, 26 Mar 2026 07:38:28 UTC (566 KB)

Was this article helpful?

Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

AI
Ask AI about this article
Powered by AI News Hub · full article context loaded
Ready

Conversation starters

Ask anything about this article…

Daily AI Digest

Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.

More about

researchpaperarxiv

Knowledge Map

Knowledge Map
TopicsEntitiesSource
Do LLMs Kno…researchpaperarxivnlplanguage-mo…arXiv

Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph

This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.

Knowledge Graph100 articles · 180 connections
Scroll to zoom · drag to pan · click to open

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!

More in Research Papers