Conformal Selective Prediction with General Risk Control
In deploying artificial intelligence (AI) models, selective prediction offers the option to abstain from making a prediction when uncertain about model quality. To fulfill its promise, it is crucial to enforce strict and precise error control over cases where the model is trusted. We propose Selective Conformal Risk control with E-values (SCoRE), a new framework for deriving such decisions for any trained model and any user-defined, bounded and continuously-valued risk. SCoRE offers two types of guarantees on the risk among ``positive'' cases in which the system opts to trust the model. Built — Tian Bai, Ying Jin
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:In deploying artificial intelligence (AI) models, selective prediction offers the option to abstain from making a prediction when uncertain about model quality. To fulfill its promise, it is crucial to enforce strict and precise error control over cases where the model is trusted. We propose Selective Conformal Risk control with E-values (SCoRE), a new framework for deriving such decisions for any trained model and any user-defined, bounded and continuously-valued risk. SCoRE offers two types of guarantees on the risk among ``positive'' cases in which the system opts to trust the model. Built upon conformal inference and hypothesis testing ideas, SCoRE first constructs a class of (generalized) e-values, which are non-negative random variables whose product with the unknown risk has expectation no greater than one. Such a property is ensured by data exchangeability without requiring any modeling assumptions. Passing these e-values on to hypothesis testing procedures, we yield the binary trust decisions with finite-sample error control. SCoRE avoids the need of uniform concentration, and can be readily extended to settings with distribution shifts. We evaluate the proposed methods with simulations and demonstrate their efficacy through applications to error management in drug discovery, health risk prediction, and large language models.
Subjects:
Methodology (stat.ME); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Applications (stat.AP); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.24704 [stat.ME]
(or arXiv:2603.24704v1 [stat.ME] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.24704
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Ying Jin [view email] [v1] Wed, 25 Mar 2026 18:29:23 UTC (1,655 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxivExclusive: Longtime Google DeepMind researcher David Silver leaves to found his own AI startup - fortune.com
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiwgFBVV95cUxNb3Z5ZnVqZDd2NzFYNG1CTmJnc2V2RlZpa01yQ2Rld29IeUV2d3BBZUJqMFBpdWxEY05SQ24wX25uS1hEcmpMUjFsUTU5YjhuYjFCRmJPeTJzM3JtMTRoR0hlaGI3dWt1b1B3b05COXloOC1IRU1Wc0hwY3hTVXA4OEgzajdZNXREUTBrWXdQUm9fUG1WMUpaZTI1azNpN1pPa2dfeVRncmNRRjNEajktN3JVcVZNdkUzS3BjYUMzUDVuZw?oc=5" target="_blank">Exclusive: Longtime Google DeepMind researcher David Silver leaves to found his own AI startup</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">fortune.com</font>

Roguelike Devlog: Redesigning a Game UI With an AI 2D Game Maker
<p>Sector Scavengers is a spacefaring extraction roguelike where each run feeds a larger civilization-building meta game. This week was all about solving a UI problem that kept getting worse the longer I ignored it: one hub trying to do too much.</p> <p>What I learned quickly is that running both game modes through a single central hub was making both of them worse. Here is how I used Makko to work through it.</p> <h2> When One Screen Tries to Do Everything </h2> <p>My meta progression systems — crew advancement, station building, hardware research, void powers, and card unlocks — were all living in the same HUD as the controls for individual Expedition runs. On paper it sounded efficient. In practice it created a serious information architecture problem.</p> <p>The deeper I got into it, t
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
AI maps science papers to predict research trends two to three years ahead - Tech Xplore
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMie0FVX3lxTE5aTkZYTWdaRDZwTXNRMldpMG1WZ1YzWDZTOHN5M183Z3A1ZTFYbnhEWTdPRmpvZnZFU0xodlRsNWxFaGxTcEpwalhJNmJpQWE5VjhaRS1tOXJIeTc5Z0JNblJ3dFd4WjRYZGJOX0NrWGt6ZmZJVTBpRm5wWQ?oc=5" target="_blank">AI maps science papers to predict research trends two to three years ahead</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Tech Xplore</font>
AI inspires new research topics in materials science - Nanowerk
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiZ0FVX3lxTFBPWlJSM2ExeVQ3LVppTm45NHpEMW9YVkxscThCNDd2OVB0c3J1ZmVCbWNSZWZ0TjZwSzlOdEFXN2UtRk5LU1hxdXd4ZklldGxoM0FZSnhCd19PWkNHQ1ZRVDNwSHNUSk0?oc=5" target="_blank">AI inspires new research topics in materials science</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Nanowerk</font>

AI maps science papers to predict research trends two to three years ahead
The number of scientific papers is growing so rapidly that scientists are no longer able to keep track of all of them, even in their own research area. Researchers from the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), in collaboration with scientific partners, have shown how new research ideas can still be obtained from this wealth of information. Using artificial intelligence (AI), they systematically analyzed materials science publications to identify potential new avenues of research. Their results have been published in Nature Machine Intelligence.


Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!