Distributional Regression with Tabular Foundation Models: Evaluating Probabilistic Predictions via Proper Scoring Rules
arXiv:2603.08206v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Tabular foundation models such as TabPFN and TabICL already produce full predictive distributions, yet the benchmarks used to evaluate them (TabArena, TALENT, and others) still rely almost exclusively on point-estimate metrics (RMSE, $R^2$). This mismatch implicitly rewards models that elicit a good conditional mean while ignoring the quality of the predicted distribution. We make two contributions. First, we propose supplementing standard point metrics with proper scoring rules (CRPS, CRLS, and the Interval Score) and provide a head-to — Jonas Landsgesell, Pascal Knoll
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Tabular foundation models such as TabPFN and TabICL already produce full predictive distributions, yet the benchmarks used to evaluate them (TabArena, TALENT, and others) still rely almost exclusively on point-estimate metrics (RMSE, $R^2$). This mismatch implicitly rewards models that elicit a good conditional mean while ignoring the quality of the predicted distribution. We make two contributions. First, we propose supplementing standard point metrics with proper scoring rules (CRPS, CRLS, and the Interval Score) and provide a head-to-head comparison of realTabPFNv2.5 and TabICLv2 with regards to some proper scoring rules across 20 OpenML regression datasets. Second, we show analytically and empirically that different proper scoring rules induce different model rankings and different inductive biases during training, even though each rule is individually minimized by the true distribution. Fine-tuning realTabPFNv2.5 with scoring rules not seen during pretraining (CRLS, $\beta=1.8$ energy score) yields consistent improvements on the corresponding metrics, confirming that the training loss shapes the model beyond what propriety alone guarantees. Together, these findings argue for (i) reporting distributional metrics in tabular regression benchmarks and (ii) making the training objective of foundation models adaptable (via fine-tuning or task-token conditioning) to the scoring rule relevant to the downstream decision problem.
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.08206 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2603.08206v4 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.08206
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Jonas Landsgesell [view email] [v1] Mon, 9 Mar 2026 10:38:01 UTC (1,673 KB) [v2] Fri, 13 Mar 2026 16:39:12 UTC (1,536 KB) [v3] Mon, 16 Mar 2026 14:03:47 UTC (1,537 KB) [v4] Sat, 28 Mar 2026 08:41:20 UTC (836 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxivChatGPT acts as a "cognitive crutch" that weakens memory, new research suggests - PsyPost
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiowFBVV95cUxQTC13Zm5WZG9iQmRmZFpXM0ctamxRZ3E5N0ZFRDlIOWhHa2l1eTVmaTBzZFR6VGx6QjR2VEd0SFZoY0l4ZXVPSVF1c3FDTnE4Nk5zanNMWXhyLVpxVVlIUEZhZUFxXzYtQkRnM2E5eTN5M3NYUmJsX09YMTR6dWhLQ2hUSk55S2FJQXV4WFEzVFB4ZzhyS21RUzFoMDJzSXpQQ1pR?oc=5" target="_blank">ChatGPT acts as a "cognitive crutch" that weakens memory, new research suggests</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">PsyPost</font>
Gemini Deep Think: Redefining the Future of Scientific Research - Google DeepMind
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMipgFBVV95cUxPRmtMZnRYNW04a3Q4b0dSQm9aall0S3BJWFFOczQ3dmdfX3cyR1plYlotZHg5ekhlZ2s3cUd6Y1pyT3lkVEJrV1V0c0NWVlBQNHlMbXlEbXpTYWlSVUZHVllYZWdSb2RMU2JTelVGMXBEckZSdWt5VUs1d24zdUVLaExpS0NZMmtpSTRoNDd2MHRZdlBRaWxSWmVTNk0wRWtRQ2NaV2ln?oc=5" target="_blank">Gemini Deep Think: Redefining the Future of Scientific Research</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Google DeepMind</font>
Alibaba Poaches Google DeepMind Research Scientist For Qwen AI Push - Yahoo Finance
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMijwFBVV95cUxOYTZwZk0walRzazJQampab1FCM2k4Uy1SYk12UWZraENkUXYzZU9kbnlGTGZJS0pFaTZIUFlKZFkwVnJkRzhKbXhNV3lNdUZpdF8tSU1LMklqcTZlUDZERDZ3VzdWbjNQYUN4T2d2ZkRQT1R1MUc0LXdYNndPQTNzbXBXMXJhb3ZEZE00ZFMtaw?oc=5" target="_blank">Alibaba Poaches Google DeepMind Research Scientist For Qwen AI Push</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Yahoo Finance</font>
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
Alibaba Poaches Google DeepMind Research Scientist For Qwen AI Push - Yahoo Finance
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMijwFBVV95cUxOYTZwZk0walRzazJQampab1FCM2k4Uy1SYk12UWZraENkUXYzZU9kbnlGTGZJS0pFaTZIUFlKZFkwVnJkRzhKbXhNV3lNdUZpdF8tSU1LMklqcTZlUDZERDZ3VzdWbjNQYUN4T2d2ZkRQT1R1MUc0LXdYNndPQTNzbXBXMXJhb3ZEZE00ZFMtaw?oc=5" target="_blank">Alibaba Poaches Google DeepMind Research Scientist For Qwen AI Push</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Yahoo Finance</font>
Is AI's visual understanding mostly a 'mirage'? New research suggests so. - Fortune
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMihgFBVV95cUxORGxTdWF3bnBiU0VaUEVtanJCT1htWVdjTUo3UnJycUxKcl9HU3Q1ODNINW9na1R0aENXXzhGYnc0Qlg3aGFGM2hiTVNFSjBZQ2FPUElZYmVGdzhfU0d5QkR2cDVnSzJBd2Y5WEVMLUJfWHY4YUc5c1I1U1dUQW9TeU56U1JjQQ?oc=5" target="_blank">Is AI's visual understanding mostly a 'mirage'? New research suggests so.</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Fortune</font>
71% of Businesses Are Invisible to AI - And Most Don't Know It Yet
Search didn't evolve - it got replaced. AI systems don't return links, they return answers. New research shows 71% of businesses are invisible to AI recommendation engines. Brand size doesn't matter. Vanguard scores 16/100 while ProtonMail scores 88. The playbook that won Google doesn't work here. Clarity beats clout. Read All

Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!