Olbedo: An Albedo and Shading Aerial Dataset for Large-Scale Outdoor Environments
arXiv:2602.22025v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Intrinsic image decomposition (IID) of outdoor scenes is crucial for relighting, editing, and understanding large-scale environments, but progress has been limited by the lack of real-world datasets with reliable albedo and shading supervision. We introduce Olbedo, a large-scale aerial dataset for outdoor albedo--shading decomposition in the wild. Olbedo contains 5,664 UAV images captured across four landscape types, multiple years, and diverse illumination conditions. Each view is accompanied by multi-view consistent albedo and shading maps, — Shuang Song, Debao Huang, Deyan Deng, Haolin Xiong, Yang Tang, Yajie Zhao, Rongjun Qin
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Intrinsic image decomposition (IID) of outdoor scenes is crucial for relighting, editing, and understanding large-scale environments, but progress has been limited by the lack of real-world datasets with reliable albedo and shading supervision. We introduce Olbedo, a large-scale aerial dataset for outdoor albedo--shading decomposition in the wild. Olbedo contains 5,664 UAV images captured across four landscape types, multiple years, and diverse illumination conditions. Each view is accompanied by multi-view consistent albedo and shading maps, metric depth, surface normals, sun and sky shading components, camera poses, and, for recent flights, measured HDR sky domes. These annotations are derived from an inverse-rendering refinement pipeline over multi-view stereo reconstructions and calibrated sky illumination, together with per-pixel confidence masks. We demonstrate that Olbedo enables state-of-the-art diffusion-based IID models, originally trained on synthetic indoor data, to generalize to real outdoor imagery: fine-tuning on Olbedo significantly improves single-view outdoor albedo prediction on the MatrixCity benchmark. We further illustrate applications of Olbedo-trained models to multi-view consistent relighting of 3D assets, material editing, and scene change analysis for urban digital twins. We release the dataset, baseline models, and an evaluation protocol to support future research in outdoor intrinsic decomposition and illumination-aware aerial vision.
Comments: CVPR 2026
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2602.22025 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2602.22025v2 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.22025
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Rongjun Qin [view email] [v1] Tue, 24 Feb 2026 15:37:10 UTC (105,117 KB) [v2] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 14:25:27 UTC (49,383 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Building a Production RAG Pipeline: Lessons from Real-World AI Apps
Building a Production RAG Pipeline: Lessons from Real-World AI Apps RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) sounds simple on paper — embed your documents, store them in a vector DB, retrieve the relevant chunks, and pass them to an LLM. In practice, getting a RAG pipeline to production quality is significantly harder. Here's what I learned building RAG pipelines for real SaaS products. The Naive Implementation Most tutorials show you this flow: Chunk your documents Embed them with OpenAI Store in Pinecone Retrieve top-k chunks Pass to GPT-4 This works fine in demos. It fails in production for a few key reasons. Problem 1: Chunking Strategy Kills Retrieval Quality Naive fixed-size chunking (every 512 tokens) destroys semantic context. A paragraph about "authentication" gets split mid-sentence,

I Made Parseltongue
Yes, that one from HPMoR by @Eliezer Yudkowsky . And I mean it absolutely literally - this is a language designed to make lies inexpressible. It catches LLMs' ungrounded statements, incoherent logic and hallucinations. Comes with notebooks (Jupyter-style), server for use with agents, and inspection tooling. Github , Documentation . Works everywhere - even in the web Claude with the code execution sandbox. How Unsophisticated lies and manipulations are typically ungrounded or include logical inconsistencies. Coherent, factually grounded deception is a problem whose complexity grows exponentially - and our AI is far from solving such tasks. There will still be a theoretical possibility to do it - especially under incomplete information - and we have a guarantee that there is no full computat
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.





Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!