Computer Science > Computers and Society

arXiv:2602.09678 (cs)

[Submitted on 10 Feb 2026 (v1), last revised 26 Mar 2026 (this version, v2)]

Title:Administrative Law's Fourth Settlement: AI and the Capability-Accountability Trap

Authors:Nicholas Caputo View a PDF of the paper titled Administrative Law's Fourth Settlement: AI and the Capability-Accountability Trap, by Nicholas Caputo View PDF

Abstract:Since 1887, administrative law has navigated a "capability-accountability trap": technological change forces government to become more sophisticated, but sophistication renders agencies opaque to generalist overseers like the courts and Congress. The law's response--substituting procedural review for substantive oversight--has produced a sedimentary accretion of requirements that ossify capacity without ensuring democratic control. This Article argues that the Supreme Court's post-Loper Bright retrenchment is best understood as an effort to shrink administration back to comprehensible size in response to this complexification. But reducing complexity in this way sacrifices capability precisely when climate change, pandemics, and AI risks demand more sophisticated governance. AI offers a different path. Unlike many prior administrative technologies that increased opacity alongside capacity, AI can help build "scrutability" in government, translating technical complexity into accessible terms, surfacing the assumptions that matter for oversight, and enabling substantive verification of agency reasoning. This Article proposes three doctrinal innovations within administrative law to realize this potential: a Model and System Dossier (documenting model purpose, evaluation, monitoring, and versioning) extending the administrative record to AI decision-making; a material-model-change trigger specifying when AI updates require new process; and a "deference to audit" standard that rewards agencies for auditable evaluation of their AI tools. The result is a framework for what this Article calls the "Fourth Settlement," administrative law that escapes the capability-accountability trap by preserving capability while restoring comprehensible oversight of administration.

Comments: 67 pages

Subjects:

Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2602.09678 [cs.CY]

(or arXiv:2602.09678v2 [cs.CY] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.09678

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Nicholas Caputo [view email] [v1] Tue, 10 Feb 2026 11:36:01 UTC (847 KB) [v2] Thu, 26 Mar 2026 19:24:38 UTC (873 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Administrative Law's Fourth Settlement: AI and the Capability-Accountability Trap, by Nicholas Caputo

• View PDF

view license

Current browse context: cs.CY

< prev

|   next >

new | recent | 2026-02

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

• NASA ADS

• Google Scholar

• Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation Loading...

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

Links to Code Toggle

Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

• Author

• Venue

• Institution

• Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)