Unveiling Implicit Advantage Symmetry: Why GRPO Struggles with Exploration and Difficulty Adaptation
arXiv:2602.05548v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), particularly GRPO, has become the standard for eliciting LLM reasoning. However, its efficiency in exploration and difficulty adaptation remains an open challenge. In this work, we argue that these bottlenecks stem from an implicit advantage symmetry inherent in Group Relative Advantage Estimation (GRAE). This symmetry induces two critical limitations: (i) at the group level, strict symmetry in weights between correct and incorrect trajectories leaves unsampled action logits unchang — Zhiqi Yu, Zhangquan Chen, Mengting Liu, Heye Zhang, Liangqiong Qu
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), particularly GRPO, has become the standard for eliciting LLM reasoning. However, its efficiency in exploration and difficulty adaptation remains an open challenge. In this work, we argue that these bottlenecks stem from an implicit advantage symmetry inherent in Group Relative Advantage Estimation (GRAE). This symmetry induces two critical limitations: (i) at the group level, strict symmetry in weights between correct and incorrect trajectories leaves unsampled action logits unchanged, thereby hindering exploration of novel correct solution. (ii) at the sample level, the algorithm implicitly prioritizes medium-difficulty samples, remaining agnostic to the non-stationary demands of difficulty focus. Through controlled experiments, we reveal that this symmetric property is sub-optimal, yielding two pivotal insights: (i) asymmetrically suppressing the advantages of correct trajectories encourages essential exploration. (ii) learning efficiency is maximized by a curriculum-like transition-prioritizing simpler samples initially before gradually shifting to complex ones. Motivated by these findings, we propose Asymmetric GRAE (A-GRAE), which dynamically modulates exploration incentives and sample-difficulty focus. Experiments across seven benchmarks demonstrate that A-GRAE consistently improves GRPO and its variants across both LLMs and MLLMs.
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2602.05548 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2602.05548v3 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.05548
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Zhiqi Yu [view email] [v1] Thu, 5 Feb 2026 11:07:14 UTC (11,876 KB) [v2] Thu, 12 Feb 2026 06:56:38 UTC (11,876 KB) [v3] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 04:41:24 UTC (11,880 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
New research could empower people without AI expertise to help create trustworthy AI applications
Involving people without AI expertise in the development and evaluation of artificial intelligence applications could help create better, fairer, and more trustworthy automated decision-making systems, new research suggests. After enlisting members of the public to evaluate the potential impacts of two real-world applications, researchers from UK universities will present a paper at a major international computing conference which suggests how "participatory AI auditing" could improve AI decision-making in the future.
Consistency Amplifies: How Behavioral Variance Shapes Agent Accuracy
Analysis of behavioral consistency in large language model agents reveals that while consistent performance correlates with higher accuracy, consistency can amplify both correct and incorrect interpretations, emphasizing that accurate interpretation is more crucial than execution consistency for production deployment. (2 upvotes on HuggingFace)
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!