NRR-Phi: Text-to-State Mapping for Ambiguity Preservation in LLM Inference
arXiv:2601.19933v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models exhibit a systematic tendency toward early semantic commitment: given ambiguous input, they collapse multiple valid interpretations into a single response before sufficient context is available. This premature collapse discards information that may prove essential as dialogue evolves. We present a formal framework for text-to-state mapping (phi: T -> S) that transforms natural language into a non-collapsing state space where multiple interpretations coexist. The mapping decomposes into three stages: conflict det — Kei Saito
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large language models exhibit a systematic tendency toward early semantic commitment: given ambiguous input, they collapse multiple valid interpretations into a single response before sufficient context is available. This premature collapse discards information that may prove essential as dialogue evolves. We present a formal framework for text-to-state mapping (phi: T -> S) that transforms natural language into a non-collapsing state space where multiple interpretations coexist. The mapping decomposes into three stages: conflict detection, interpretation extraction, and state construction. We instantiate phi with a hybrid extraction pipeline that combines rule-based segmentation for explicit conflict markers with LLM-based enumeration of implicit ambiguity. On a test set of 68 ambiguous sentences, the resulting states preserve interpretive multiplicity: hybrid extraction yields mean state entropy H = 1.087 bits across ambiguity categories, compared to H = 0 for collapse-based baselines that commit to a single interpretation. We also instantiate the rule-based conflict detector for Japanese markers to illustrate cross-lingual portability. This framework extends Non-Resolution Reasoning (NRR) by providing the algorithmic bridge between text and the NRR state space, enabling architectural collapse deferment in LLM inference. Design principles for state-to-state transformations are detailed in the Appendix, with empirical validation on 580 test cases demonstrating 0% collapse for principle-satisfying operators versus up to 17.8% for violating operators.
Comments: 25 pages, 5 figures, 7 tables. Replacement synced to repository snapshot v39. Series hub link: this https URL
Subjects:
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
ACM classes: I.2.7; I.2.0
Cite as: arXiv:2601.19933 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2601.19933v5 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.19933
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Kei Saito [view email] [v1] Mon, 12 Jan 2026 08:04:47 UTC (644 KB) [v2] Tue, 3 Feb 2026 01:55:46 UTC (747 KB) [v3] Mon, 9 Feb 2026 16:08:30 UTC (398 KB) [v4] Wed, 4 Mar 2026 17:21:49 UTC (399 KB) [v5] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 09:41:49 UTC (400 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
New research could empower people without AI expertise to help create trustworthy AI applications
Involving people without AI expertise in the development and evaluation of artificial intelligence applications could help create better, fairer, and more trustworthy automated decision-making systems, new research suggests. After enlisting members of the public to evaluate the potential impacts of two real-world applications, researchers from UK universities will present a paper at a major international computing conference which suggests how "participatory AI auditing" could improve AI decision-making in the future.
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
New research could empower people without AI expertise to help create trustworthy AI applications
Involving people without AI expertise in the development and evaluation of artificial intelligence applications could help create better, fairer, and more trustworthy automated decision-making systems, new research suggests. After enlisting members of the public to evaluate the potential impacts of two real-world applications, researchers from UK universities will present a paper at a major international computing conference which suggests how "participatory AI auditing" could improve AI decision-making in the future.
Consistency Amplifies: How Behavioral Variance Shapes Agent Accuracy
Analysis of behavioral consistency in large language model agents reveals that while consistent performance correlates with higher accuracy, consistency can amplify both correct and incorrect interpretations, emphasizing that accurate interpretation is more crucial than execution consistency for production deployment. (2 upvotes on HuggingFace)
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!