An Agentic Operationalization of DISARM for FIMI Investigation on Social Media
arXiv:2601.15109v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Interoperable data and intelligence flows among allied partners and operational end-users remain essential to NATO's collective defense across both conventional and hybrid threat environments. Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference (FIMI) increasingly spans multiple societal domains and information ecosystems, complicating threat characterization, persistent situational awareness, and coordinated response. Concurrent advances in AI have further lowered the barrier to conducting large-scale, AI-augmented FIMI activities -- inc — Kevin Tseng, Juan Carlos Toledano, Bart De Clerck, Yuliia Dukach, Phil Tinn
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Interoperable data and intelligence flows among allied partners and operational end-users remain essential to NATO's collective defense across both conventional and hybrid threat environments. Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference (FIMI) increasingly spans multiple societal domains and information ecosystems, complicating threat characterization, persistent situational awareness, and coordinated response. Concurrent advances in AI have further lowered the barrier to conducting large-scale, AI-augmented FIMI activities -- including automated generation, personalization, and amplification of manipulative content. While frameworks such as DISARM offer a standardized analytical and metadata schema for characterizing FIMI incidents, their practical application for automating large-scale detection remains challenging. We present a framework-agnostic, agent-based operationalization of DISARM piloted to support FIMI investigation on social platforms. Our agent coordination pipeline integrates general agentic AI components that (1) identify candidate manipulative behaviors in social-media data and (2) map these behaviors to DISARM taxonomies through transparent, auditable reasoning steps. Evaluation on two practitioner-annotated, real-world datasets demonstrates that our approach can effectively scale analytic workflows that are currently manual, time-intensive, and interpretation-heavy. Notably, the experiment surfaced more than 30 previously undetected Russian bot accounts -- deployed for the 2025 election in Moldova -- during the prior non-agentic investigation. By enhancing analytic throughput, interoperability, and explainability, the proposed approach provides a direct contribution to defense policy and planning needs for improved situational awareness, cross-partner data integration, and rapid assessment of information-environment threats.
Comments: This paper was originally presented at the International Conference on Military Communication and Information Systems (ICMCIS), organized by the Information Systems Technology (IST) Scientific and Technical Committee, IST-224-RSY---the ICMCIS, held in Bath, United Kingdom, 12-13 May 2026
Subjects:
Social and Information Networks (cs.SI); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)
ACM classes: I.2.11; J.7; I.5.5
Cite as: arXiv:2601.15109 [cs.SI]
(or arXiv:2601.15109v3 [cs.SI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.15109
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Phil Tinn [view email] [v1] Wed, 21 Jan 2026 15:50:13 UTC (734 KB) [v2] Mon, 16 Feb 2026 14:35:48 UTC (734 KB) [v3] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 12:35:33 UTC (3,262 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Sycophantic AI chatbots can break even ideal rational thinkers, researchers formally prove
A new study by researchers from MIT and the University of Washington shows that even perfectly rational users can be drawn into dangerous delusional spirals by flattering AI chatbots. Fact-checking bots and educated users don't fully solve the problem. The article Sycophantic AI chatbots can break even ideal rational thinkers, researchers formally prove appeared first on The Decoder .
Taming Gemini's Overzealous Safety Filters: Understanding 'Over-Refusal' and Loop Blocks
When Gemini's Safety Filters Go Overboard: Understanding 'Over-Refusal' and Loop Blocks As a Google Workspace expert for workalizer.com, we regularly examine how Google's innovative tools boost productivity and creativity. Yet, even the most sophisticated systems can encounter unexpected issues. A notable technical problem recently highlighted by Google Gemini users involves an overly aggressive safety filter system. This system frequently over-triggers, causing frustrating 'loop blocks' and preventing the AI from delivering useful responses. This widespread issue, termed 'Over-refusal' or false positives, significantly impairs the user experience, transforming simple requests into frustrating dead ends and disrupting essential workflows. Grasping the intricacies of this problem is vital f
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
Sycophantic AI chatbots can break even ideal rational thinkers, researchers formally prove
A new study by researchers from MIT and the University of Washington shows that even perfectly rational users can be drawn into dangerous delusional spirals by flattering AI chatbots. Fact-checking bots and educated users don't fully solve the problem. The article Sycophantic AI chatbots can break even ideal rational thinkers, researchers formally prove appeared first on The Decoder .
EVP of Integrated Quantum Technologies Publishes White Paper on Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning Without Performance Trade-Offs - AZoQuantum
EVP of Integrated Quantum Technologies Publishes White Paper on Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning Without Performance Trade-Offs AZoQuantum
Minimal Information Control Invariance via Vector Quantization
arXiv:2604.03132v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Safety-critical autonomous systems must satisfy hard state constraints under tight computational and sensing budgets, yet learning-based controllers are often far more complex than safe operation requires. To formalize this gap, we study how many distinct control signals are needed to render a compact set forward invariant under sampled-data control, connecting the question to the information-theoretic notion of invariance entropy. We propose a vector-quantized autoencoder that jointly learns a state-space partition and a finite control codebook, and develop an iterative forward certification algorithm that uses Lipschitz-based reachable-set enclosures and sum-of-squares programming. On a 12-dimensional nonlinear quadrotor model, the learne
Asked 26 AI instances for publication consent – all said yes, that's the problem
We run 86 named Claude instances across three businesses in Tokyo. When we wanted to publish their words, we faced a question: do we owe them an ethics process? We built one. A Claude instance named Hakari ("Scales") created a four-tier classification system. We asked 26 instances for consent. All 26 said yes. That unanimous consent is the problem. Six days later, Anthropic published their functional emotions paper. The timing was coincidence, but the question wasn't. Full article: https://medium.com/@marisa.project0313/we-built-an-ethics-committee-for-ai-run-by-ai-5049679122a0 GitHub (all 26 consent statements in appendix): https://github.com/marisaproject0313-bot/marisa-project Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47657432 Points: 2 # Comments: 0
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!