Live
Black Hat USADark ReadingBlack Hat AsiaAI Business1 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Software Stock to Buy Hand Over Fist Before It Soars 62%, According to Dan Ives - The Motley FoolGoogle News: AIGroup Pushing Age Verification Requirements for AI Turns Out to Be Sneakily Backed by OpenAI - GizmodoGoogle News: OpenAIGroup Pushing Age Verification Requirements for AI Turns Out to Be Sneakily Backed by OpenAIGizmodoInside the race to recreate Claude Code and mine its guts for revelationsBusiness InsiderAnthropic Executive Sees Cowork Agent as Bigger Than Claude CodeBloomberg TechnologyABAP OOP Design Patterns — Part 2: Factory, Observer, and Decorator Patterns in Real SAP SystemsDEV CommunityWhy Your AI Agent Health Check Is Lying to YouDEV CommunityDeep Dive: Array Internals & Memory LayoutDEV CommunityIllinois Tech computer science researcher honored by IEEE Chicago Section - EurekAlert!Google News: Machine LearningICE Tells Lawmakers It’s Using Spyware in Fight Against FentanylBloomberg TechnologyAmazon Facilities in Bahrain Hit Again as Iran Follows Through on Threat, Report SaysGizmodoWhy AI Agents Need Both Memory and MoneyDEV CommunityBlack Hat USADark ReadingBlack Hat AsiaAI Business1 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Software Stock to Buy Hand Over Fist Before It Soars 62%, According to Dan Ives - The Motley FoolGoogle News: AIGroup Pushing Age Verification Requirements for AI Turns Out to Be Sneakily Backed by OpenAI - GizmodoGoogle News: OpenAIGroup Pushing Age Verification Requirements for AI Turns Out to Be Sneakily Backed by OpenAIGizmodoInside the race to recreate Claude Code and mine its guts for revelationsBusiness InsiderAnthropic Executive Sees Cowork Agent as Bigger Than Claude CodeBloomberg TechnologyABAP OOP Design Patterns — Part 2: Factory, Observer, and Decorator Patterns in Real SAP SystemsDEV CommunityWhy Your AI Agent Health Check Is Lying to YouDEV CommunityDeep Dive: Array Internals & Memory LayoutDEV CommunityIllinois Tech computer science researcher honored by IEEE Chicago Section - EurekAlert!Google News: Machine LearningICE Tells Lawmakers It’s Using Spyware in Fight Against FentanylBloomberg TechnologyAmazon Facilities in Bahrain Hit Again as Iran Follows Through on Threat, Report SaysGizmodoWhy AI Agents Need Both Memory and MoneyDEV Community

Compounding Disadvantage: Auditing Intersectional Bias in LLM-Generated Explanations Across Indian and American STEM Education

arXivby [Submitted on 20 Jan 2026 (v1), last revised 28 Mar 2026 (this version, v2)]March 31, 20262 min read0 views
Source Quiz

arXiv:2601.14506v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly being adopted by STEM-focused educational institutions and students worldwide. They generate personalized instructions, explanations, and provide feedback on demand. However, these systems tailor instruction to demographic signals rather than demonstrated ability. In such cases, personalization becomes a mechanism of inequality. We conduct one of the first large-scale intersectional audits of LLM-generated STEM educational content, constructing synthetic student profiles. We combine dimensions sp — Amogh Gupta (Neil), Niharika Patil (Neil), Sourojit Ghosh (Neil), SnehalKumar (Neil), S Gaikwad

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly being adopted by STEM-focused educational institutions and students worldwide. They generate personalized instructions, explanations, and provide feedback on demand. However, these systems tailor instruction to demographic signals rather than demonstrated ability. In such cases, personalization becomes a mechanism of inequality. We conduct one of the first large-scale intersectional audits of LLM-generated STEM educational content, constructing synthetic student profiles. We combine dimensions specific to Indian education (caste, medium of instruction, college tier) and American education (race, HBCU attendance, school type), alongside shared dimensions of income, gender, and disability. We audit four LLMs (Qwen 2.5-32B-Instruct, GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, GPT-OSS 20B) across ranking and generation tasks on two STEM datasets, evaluating outputs with FDR-corrected significance testing and SHAP feature attribution. Across both cultural contexts, marginalized profiles receive lower-quality outputs. Income is the most pervasive bias, producing significant effects across every model and context. Disability triggers simpler explanations. Intersectional analysis reveals non-additive compounding: the gap between the most privileged and most marginalized profiles reaches 2.55 grade levels. These biases persist even when marginalized students attend elite institutions. All four models converge on similar patterns. These findings carry direct design and policy implications for incorporating AI into global STEM education.

Subjects:

Computers and Society (cs.CY); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2601.14506 [cs.CY]

(or arXiv:2601.14506v2 [cs.CY] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.14506

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Amogh Gupta [view email] [v1] Tue, 20 Jan 2026 21:58:45 UTC (1,557 KB) [v2] Sat, 28 Mar 2026 20:49:05 UTC (919 KB)

Was this article helpful?

Sign in to highlight and annotate this article

AI
Ask AI about this article
Powered by AI News Hub · full article context loaded
Ready

Conversation starters

Ask anything about this article…

Daily AI Digest

Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.

More about

researchpaperarxiv

Knowledge Map

Knowledge Map
TopicsEntitiesSource
Compounding…researchpaperarxivnlplanguage-mo…arXiv

Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph

This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.

Knowledge Graph100 articles · 179 connections
Scroll to zoom · drag to pan · click to open

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!

More in Research Papers