Fairness in Healthcare Processes: A Quantitative Analysis of Decision Making in Triage
arXiv:2601.11065v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Fairness in automated decision-making has become a critical concern, particularly in high-pressure healthcare scenarios such as emergency triage, where fast and equitable decisions are essential. Process mining is increasingly investigating fairness. There is a growing area focusing on fairness-aware algorithms. So far, we know less how these concepts perform on empirical healthcare data or how they cover aspects of justice theory. This study addresses this research problem and proposes a process mining approach to assess fairness in tr — Rachmadita Andreswari, Stephan A. Fahrenkrog-Petersen, Jan Mendling
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Fairness in automated decision-making has become a critical concern, particularly in high-pressure healthcare scenarios such as emergency triage, where fast and equitable decisions are essential. Process mining is increasingly investigating fairness. There is a growing area focusing on fairness-aware algorithms. So far, we know less how these concepts perform on empirical healthcare data or how they cover aspects of justice theory. This study addresses this research problem and proposes a process mining approach to assess fairness in triage by linking real-life event logs with conceptual dimensions of justice. Using the MIMICEL event log (as derived from MIMIC-IV ED), we analyze time, re-do, deviation and decision as process outcomes, and evaluate the influence of age, gender, race, language and insurance using the Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square and effect size measurements. These outcomes are mapped to justice dimensions to support the development of a conceptual framework. The results demonstrate which aspects of potential unfairness in high-acuity and sub-acute surface. In this way, this study contributes empirical insights that support further research in responsible, fairness-aware process mining in healthcare.
Comments: conference
Subjects:
Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2601.11065 [cs.CY]
(or arXiv:2601.11065v2 [cs.CY] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.11065
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Rachmadita Andreswari [view email] [v1] Fri, 16 Jan 2026 08:02:33 UTC (372 KB) [v2] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 12:49:58 UTC (372 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Roguelike Devlog: Redesigning a Game UI With an AI 2D Game Maker
<p>Sector Scavengers is a spacefaring extraction roguelike where each run feeds a larger civilization-building meta game. This week was all about solving a UI problem that kept getting worse the longer I ignored it: one hub trying to do too much.</p> <p>What I learned quickly is that running both game modes through a single central hub was making both of them worse. Here is how I used Makko to work through it.</p> <h2> When One Screen Tries to Do Everything </h2> <p>My meta progression systems — crew advancement, station building, hardware research, void powers, and card unlocks — were all living in the same HUD as the controls for individual Expedition runs. On paper it sounded efficient. In practice it created a serious information architecture problem.</p> <p>The deeper I got into it, t
New Research Directions in Materials Science with AI - Bioengineer.org
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMigwFBVV95cUxNd0wwNmxWampidEpMUC1lUEhkZU9WanN4OHVSSENtalZ0dm5OWkx3Ull2RktEaXJiVkUzRVNxbzMyNlRTcER3eW9YWXZWclhNTE1CcTFkVWdqOTZjdFhDUGxwbjVKWFpwUi14ZllfU19PN25KNlBQSzRicFdCdzdqQ3h2cw?oc=5" target="_blank">New Research Directions in Materials Science with AI</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Bioengineer.org</font>
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
AI maps science papers to predict research trends two to three years ahead - Tech Xplore
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMie0FVX3lxTE5aTkZYTWdaRDZwTXNRMldpMG1WZ1YzWDZTOHN5M183Z3A1ZTFYbnhEWTdPRmpvZnZFU0xodlRsNWxFaGxTcEpwalhJNmJpQWE5VjhaRS1tOXJIeTc5Z0JNblJ3dFd4WjRYZGJOX0NrWGt6ZmZJVTBpRm5wWQ?oc=5" target="_blank">AI maps science papers to predict research trends two to three years ahead</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Tech Xplore</font>
AI inspires new research topics in materials science - Nanowerk
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiZ0FVX3lxTFBPWlJSM2ExeVQ3LVppTm45NHpEMW9YVkxscThCNDd2OVB0c3J1ZmVCbWNSZWZ0TjZwSzlOdEFXN2UtRk5LU1hxdXd4ZklldGxoM0FZSnhCd19PWkNHQ1ZRVDNwSHNUSk0?oc=5" target="_blank">AI inspires new research topics in materials science</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Nanowerk</font>
AI maps science papers to predict research trends two to three years ahead
The number of scientific papers is growing so rapidly that scientists are no longer able to keep track of all of them, even in their own research area. Researchers from the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), in collaboration with scientific partners, have shown how new research ideas can still be obtained from this wealth of information. Using artificial intelligence (AI), they systematically analyzed materials science publications to identify potential new avenues of research. Their results have been published in Nature Machine Intelligence.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!