Before We Trust Them: Decision-Making Failures in Navigation of Foundation Models
arXiv:2601.05529v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: High success rates on navigation-related tasks do not necessarily translate into reliable decision making by foundation models. To examine this gap, we evaluate current models on six diagnostic tasks spanning three settings: reasoning under complete spatial information, reasoning under incomplete spatial information, and reasoning under safety-relevant information. Our results show that important decision-making failures can persist even when overall performance is strong, underscoring the need for failure-focused analysis to understand model — Jua Han, Jaeyoon Seo, Jungbin Min, Sieun Choi, Huichan Seo, Jihie Kim, Jean Oh
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:High success rates on navigation-related tasks do not necessarily translate into reliable decision making by foundation models. To examine this gap, we evaluate current models on six diagnostic tasks spanning three settings: reasoning under complete spatial information, reasoning under incomplete spatial information, and reasoning under safety-relevant information. Our results show that important decision-making failures can persist even when overall performance is strong, underscoring the need for failure-focused analysis to understand model limitations and guide future progress. In a path-planning setting with unknown cells, GPT-5 achieved a high success rate of 93%, yet the remaining cases still included invalid paths. We also find that newer models are not always more reliable than their predecessors. In reasoning under safety-relevant information, Gemini-2.5 Flash achieved only 67% on the challenging emergency-evacuation task, underperforming Gemini-2.0 Flash, which reached 100% under the same condition. Across all evaluations, models exhibited structural collapse, hallucinated reasoning, constraint violations, and unsafe decisions. These findings show that foundation models still exhibit substantial failures in navigation-related decision making and require fine-grained evaluation before they can be trusted. Project page: this https URL
Comments: Corrected author order in metadata; manuscript changed
Subjects:
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Robotics (cs.RO)
Cite as: arXiv:2601.05529 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2601.05529v4 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.05529
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Jua Han [view email] [v1] Fri, 9 Jan 2026 05:04:15 UTC (4,548 KB) [v2] Thu, 15 Jan 2026 05:09:03 UTC (4,548 KB) [v3] Sun, 18 Jan 2026 11:03:44 UTC (4,548 KB) [v4] Fri, 27 Mar 2026 04:51:48 UTC (2,440 KB)
Sign in to highlight and annotate this article
Conversation starters
Daily AI Digest
Get the top 5 AI stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
More about
researchpaperarxiv
Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models - WSJ
<a href="https://news.google.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?oc=5" target="_blank">Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">WSJ</font>
Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models - WSJ
<a href="https://news.google.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?oc=5" target="_blank">Exclusive | Caltech Researchers Claim Radical Compression of High-Fidelity AI Models</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">WSJ</font>
Combining the robot operating system with LLMs for natural-language control
Over the past few decades, robotics researchers have developed a wide range of increasingly advanced robots that can autonomously complete various real-world tasks. To be successfully deployed in real-world settings, such as in public spaces, homes and office environments, these robots should be able to make sense of instructions provided by human users and adapt their actions accordingly.
Knowledge Map
Connected Articles — Knowledge Graph
This article is connected to other articles through shared AI topics and tags.
More in Research Papers
AI Inspires New Research Topics In Materials Science - miragenews.com
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMihwFBVV95cUxQRlVFdkRBaHRvYkJJdFRlMTZmajEzeFRPU0hGWWdfbi02V1FnTUdVQ2pmY2VZLUV2NlB4V3BFdEVlSVZkUlhRSTZaNWFKMmcyWXJYbnNqbUhMTmp0NnFtMEppOXlPZkJSNHJfck5VSEVYcmUtX1k2QkJlR1BvUEdTTkp3UmlYRkk?oc=5" target="_blank">AI Inspires New Research Topics In Materials Science</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">miragenews.com</font>
From brain scans to alloys: Teaching AI to make sense of complex research data - Penn State University
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiwAFBVV95cUxPZDFHdkptQ2VUM2hmWjhqQkxoRnBiTWoxMXRRR21MUG5TamdUMlFRWmhvYVNHaFVNREVKU3VmSnVOdDVZYnNLb2ppYXRVRTZmVFVMV1pLTlVhUm9ybTNZbGtvZTdIMnIyMHNpOEk5aU9TSmxxS2Y4V2MwazYwY3JlX1Axbk1nd3pfcWhFdUJaaDJWRXJaMFIyTTROcmFHeXI3ZzFudXJ2M1h6UHI1LW1Ca1dta2RkM3BiYndocGk3Yjg?oc=5" target="_blank">From brain scans to alloys: Teaching AI to make sense of complex research data</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Penn State University</font>
Locating Risk: Task Designers and the Challenge of Risk Disclosure in RAI Content Work
arXiv:2505.24246v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As AI systems are increasingly tested and deployed in open-ended and high-stakes domains, crowdworkers are often tasked with responsible AI (RAI) content work. These tasks include labeling violent content, moderating disturbing text, or simulating harmful behavior for red teaming exercises to shape AI system behaviors. While prior research efforts have highlighted the risks to worker well-being associated with RAI content work, far less attention has been paid to how these risks are communicated to workers by task designers or individuals who design and post RAI tasks. Existing transparency frameworks and guidelines, such as model cards, datasheets, and crowdworksheets, focus on documenting model information and dataset collection process
Togedule: Scheduling Meetings with Large Language Models and Adaptive Representations of Group Availability
arXiv:2505.01000v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Scheduling is a perennial-and often challenging-problem for many groups. Existing tools are mostly static, showing an identical set of choices to everyone, regardless of the current status of attendees' inputs and preferences. In this paper, we propose Togedule, an adaptive scheduling tool that uses large language models to dynamically adjust the pool of choices and their presentation format. With the initial prototype, we conducted a formative study (N=10) and identified the potential benefits and risks of such an adaptive scheduling tool. Then, after enhancing the system, we conducted two controlled experiments, one each for attendees and organizers (total N=66). For each experiment, we compared scheduling with verbal messages, shared c
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts!